FIRME and strong reasons are drawen, from the article which is concerning the truth of Christs humane nature.
1 Christ tooke a true humane nature, like vnto vs in all things, except sinne. This nature therefore cannot bee in moe pla∣ces at one and the same time, and therefore neither can it be toge∣ther in heauē & in the bread: because it is proper vnto the nature of God onely, to be at once in diuerse places. Christes body is finite, as being a true body: but it is now in heauen, as is proued out of the article of his ascension into heauen. Therefore Christs bodie is not in the bread. Many abuse this argument, omitting the first ground which is altogether true and necessarie. For glori∣fication doth not destroie or abolish the nature of his hu∣mane nature. Handle me and see: for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as yee see me haue. While they beheld him, he was taken vp. 3. Jf the true and verie bodie of Christ be infinite, it is also inui∣sible and insensible. Therefore that which was seene, suffered and wrought on earth, was no true bodie, but apparent & phantastical: because it can not agree, no not to the Godhead it selfe, to bee at one time finite and infinite, sensible, and insensible: and so all those thinges, which are spoken of christ in the articles of our Beleefe should not haue beene done indeede, but onely should haue seemed