Positions lately held by the L. Du Perron, Bishop of Eureux, against the sufficiency and perfection of the scriptures maintaning the necessitie and authoritie of vnwritten traditions. Verie learnedly answered and confuted by D. Daniell Tillenus, Professor of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Sedan. VVith a defence of the sufficiency and perfection of the holy scriptures by the same author. Faithfully translated.

About this Item

Title
Positions lately held by the L. Du Perron, Bishop of Eureux, against the sufficiency and perfection of the scriptures maintaning the necessitie and authoritie of vnwritten traditions. Verie learnedly answered and confuted by D. Daniell Tillenus, Professor of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Sedan. VVith a defence of the sufficiency and perfection of the holy scriptures by the same author. Faithfully translated.
Author
Tilenus, Daniel, 1563-1633.
Publication
Printed at London :: By L. S[nowden] for Nathaniel Butter,
1606.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Du Perron, Jacques Davy 1556-1618 -- Early Works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early Works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"Positions lately held by the L. Du Perron, Bishop of Eureux, against the sufficiency and perfection of the scriptures maintaning the necessitie and authoritie of vnwritten traditions. Verie learnedly answered and confuted by D. Daniell Tillenus, Professor of Diuinitie in the Vniuersitie of Sedan. VVith a defence of the sufficiency and perfection of the holy scriptures by the same author. Faithfully translated." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A13773.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 6, 2024.

Pages

D. Tillenus his answer.

Thus are easily confuted all the other reasons of the Ana∣baptists, that he bringeth foorth after ours. For they be but repetitions of the solutions he giueth to ours; That Baptism is a seale of fath; That it is called the washing of Regeneration;

Page 32

That Regeneration is made by faith and by the incorrupti∣ble seed of Gods word: That saint Phillip sayd to the Eu∣nuch, If thou beleeue, thou maist be saued, &c. For it hath bin shewed, that the children which enter into the kingdome of heauen, are regenerate, That this Regeneration is don other∣wise in them, that in such as be of years of knowledge; That the sentences of Saint Peter and S. Phillip, and other like, are necessarily vnderstood of them that were capable of the hea∣ring of the word, as were all those with whom the Apostles had to do, when they began to gather the Christian Church. To apply to children, that which is spoken only to such as be of years, the consequence is as foolish, as if a man should de∣priue children of corporall nourishment, because the Scrip∣ture saith, he that doth not worke, should not eate, which is necessarily meant of such as are of years to work.

How will his Syllogisme now stand, which he frameth thus: Whatsoeuer conteineth sufficiently the principles of a science should prooue all the propositions belonging to the sayd science, and to confute all that repugne the same: But e∣uery heresie repugneth the science of Diuinity, and the scrip∣ture alone can not confute all heresies: Therefore it con∣teyneth not sufficiently, all the principles necessary, &c.

The assumption of this syllogisme, is already aboue con∣futed, by the testimonies euen of those very same, from whom he pretendeth, that the most part, yea all the principles not conteyned in the Scripture, must be taken. I could heer adde a greate number of other proofes, and testimonies, but that J shunne prolixity. I will therfore only oppose two other syllo∣gisms.

I. In the diuine wisedom, there is perfect knowledge of diui∣nity: The holy holy scripture giueth this wisedom: therfore it giueth the perfect knowledge of diuinity.

II. The principles of a science, are not contrary one vnto a∣nother: But the most part of the vnwritten principles of the Romish diuinity, repugn and destroy those that are written in the ould and new Testament▪ therefore they can not be true

Page 33

principles of true Diuinity.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.