craue the waters of life of him, but therfore she begged thē not, because she knew him not, and could not tell, neither what, nor of whō to ask. The very philosopher could tech his scholers, and common experience doth testifie the same, that no man loueth or lon∣geth for the thing he neuer loked vpon. And howe litle insight, or rather how perfectlie blind by nature we are, is alreadie shewed.
Farther, no man naturally wisheth for a∣ny thing, but he hath not only an insight, but also a delight therin, and it is gratefull to his nature, & pleasant in his eyes, or at the least so supposed either in comparison of some∣what else, or in som sort or other so reputed.
Herupon I will suppose an impossibilitie, that man hath a cleare eye in that great mi∣sterie of godlines, which the Apostle descri∣beth and which is the ground of all know∣ledge. But I aske, how is he pleased, how is he delighted therwith?
Be wee Greekes reckoned the wisest of the Gentils or Iewes once the people & pe∣culiar chosen of God? The mistery of Christ crucified to either of these, is either marue∣lous folly, or wonderfull offensiue, & to both of them alike, if God in iustice leaue them to them selues, the preaching of the Gospell,