Gainesaid by themselues.
Polydor. Ʋirgil. lib. 6. cap. 13. de inuent. rerum, writeth, that by the testimonie of Ierome it appeareth, how in a manner all the ancient holy Fathers condemned the worship of Images, for feare of idolatry.
Rhemes against Rome: or, The remoouing of the gagg of the new Gospell, and rightly placing it in the mouthes of the Romists, by the Rhemists in their English translation of the Scriptures. Which counter-gagg is heere fitted by the industrious hand of Richard Bernard ...
About this Item
- Title
- Rhemes against Rome: or, The remoouing of the gagg of the new Gospell, and rightly placing it in the mouthes of the Romists, by the Rhemists in their English translation of the Scriptures. Which counter-gagg is heere fitted by the industrious hand of Richard Bernard ...
- Author
- Bernard, Richard, 1568-1641.
- Publication
- At London :: Imprinted by Felix Kingston, for Ed. Blackmore, and are to be sold at his shop at the great south doore of Pauls,
- 1626.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Heigham, John. -- Gagge of the new Gospel -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Heigham, Roger.
- Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Bible. -- English -- Versions. -- Douai -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Cite this Item
-
"Rhemes against Rome: or, The remoouing of the gagg of the new Gospell, and rightly placing it in the mouthes of the Romists, by the Rhemists in their English translation of the Scriptures. Which counter-gagg is heere fitted by the industrious hand of Richard Bernard ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A09287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 21, 2024.
Pages
Page 164
Erasmus in Catechis. saith, that by the testimonie of sound and approued Stories it is cleere, that till Ieromes time, such as were of sound Religion, would endure no image, either painted, or grauen, to be set vp in the Churches, no not the image of Christ himselfe.
Holcot. in lib. Sap. lect. 7. saith, that no adoration is due to any Image, and that it is not lawfull to adore any Image.
Agobardus B. of Lyons, who liued in Anno 815. saith, (in Bibl. Paetrum) Whosoeuer worshippeth a Picture, molten or grauen Statue, worships an Idol, not God, nor Saint, nor Angel. See Roger Houeden, part. 1. Annal. fol. 272. where he sheweth how the Church of God detested the Decree of the 2. Nicene about worship of Images.
Aquinas, Hales, Albertus, Bonauenture, Marsilius, and nine more, cited by D. White, in his last Booke, pag. 209. doe hold, that Adoration of Images was prohibited the Iewes. Then such places as bee alledged for Images in the Old Testament by our moderne Papists, are but abused.
Bannes in Tho. 229. par. 10. pag. 170. saith, that the worship of the Images of Saints, is neither expressely, nor vnfoldedly taught in holy Scriptures. All Scriptures therefore alledged, are but abusiuely alledged to beguile the simple.