A defence of A treatise against superstitious Iesu-worship, falsely called scandalous, against the truely scandalous answer of the parson of Westminston in Sussex. Wherein also the whole structure of his Antiteichisma, so farre as it concernes the po[i]nt in controversie is overthrowne, the truth more fully cleared, and the iniquitie of that superstition more throughly detected. By M.G. the author of the former treatise, published Anno Dom. 1642
About this Item
Title
A defence of A treatise against superstitious Iesu-worship, falsely called scandalous, against the truely scandalous answer of the parson of Westminston in Sussex. Wherein also the whole structure of his Antiteichisma, so farre as it concernes the po[i]nt in controversie is overthrowne, the truth more fully cleared, and the iniquitie of that superstition more throughly detected. By M.G. the author of the former treatise, published Anno Dom. 1642
Author
Giles, Mascall, 1595 or 6-1652.
Publication
Printed at London :: for Daniel Frere, and are to be sold at his Shop at the signe of the red Ball in Little-Britaine,
1643.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Giles, Mascall, 1595 or 6-1652. -- Treatise against superstitious Jesu-worship.
Barton, Thomas, 1599 or 1600-1682 or 3. -- Antiteichisma.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A85889.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of A treatise against superstitious Iesu-worship, falsely called scandalous, against the truely scandalous answer of the parson of Westminston in Sussex. Wherein also the whole structure of his Antiteichisma, so farre as it concernes the po[i]nt in controversie is overthrowne, the truth more fully cleared, and the iniquitie of that superstition more throughly detected. By M.G. the author of the former treatise, published Anno Dom. 1642." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A85889.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 4, 2024.
Pages
SECT. VI.
HEre I shew that the said exposition of this Text is not con∣firmed
by any correspondent Scripture speaking of the
same thing, and there be some words and phrases so expoun∣ded
here, as the like words, and phrases will not beare that sense
in any Scripture, as I have fully proved in the premises (this
I say, and this is my meaning though you bee willing to wrest
me) therefore this is a false exposition. The consequence I prove
from Rom. 12. 6. and 2 Pet. 1. 20. you say the meaning of these
Scriptures is that all interpretations must be made according to
the Axiomes of the Christian faith. But granting this it makes
against you; for the Axiomes of our faith must be proved by
the Scriptures. Your answer to my testimonies of Augustine and
Zanchy is nothing at all, but this; is Augustine; is Zanchy for
you? which is frivolous. To your curse in the conclusion, I op∣pose
that of the Psalmist,* 1.1Psal. 109. He loved cursing, therefore it shall
happen to him.