A defence of A treatise against superstitious Iesu-worship, falsely called scandalous, against the truely scandalous answer of the parson of Westminston in Sussex. Wherein also the whole structure of his Antiteichisma, so farre as it concernes the po[i]nt in controversie is overthrowne, the truth more fully cleared, and the iniquitie of that superstition more throughly detected. By M.G. the author of the former treatise, published Anno Dom. 1642
Giles, Mascall, 1595 or 6-1652.

SECT. VI.

HEre I shew that the said exposition of this Text is not con∣firmed by any correspondent Scripture speaking of the same thing, and there be some words and phrases so expoun∣ded here, as the like words, and phrases will not beare that sense in any Scripture, as I have fully proved in the premises (this I say, and this is my meaning though you bee willing to wrest me) therefore this is a false exposition. The consequence I prove from Rom. 12. 6. and 2 Pet. 1. 20. you say the meaning of these Scriptures is that all interpretations must be made according to the Axiomes of the Christian faith. But granting this it makes against you; for the Axiomes of our faith must be proved by the Scriptures. Your answer to my testimonies of Augustine and Zanchy is nothing at all, but this; is Augustine; is Zanchy for you? which is frivolous. To your curse in the conclusion, I op∣pose that of the Psalmist,* Psal. 109. He loved cursing, therefore it shall happen to him.