Sect. 3.
The Aspects ought to be calculated (as the Schools speak) as they are, not quoad nos, but quoad naturam (A distinction that suits marvellously well with our present p••••pose, better a great deal then with their priority and notiority.) For
Indago astrologica: or, a brief and modest enquiry into some principal points of astrology, as it was delivered by the fathers of it, and is now generally received by the sons of it. / By Joshua Childrey of Feversham in Kent.
About this Item
- Title
- Indago astrologica: or, a brief and modest enquiry into some principal points of astrology, as it was delivered by the fathers of it, and is now generally received by the sons of it. / By Joshua Childrey of Feversham in Kent.
- Author
- Childrey, J. (Joshua), 1623-1670.
- Publication
- London :: Printed for Edward Husband, and are to be sold at his shop at the sign of the Golden Dragon in Fleet-street, near the Inner-Temple Gate,
- 1652.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Astrology -- Early works to 1800.
- Cite this Item
-
"Indago astrologica: or, a brief and modest enquiry into some principal points of astrology, as it was delivered by the fathers of it, and is now generally received by the sons of it. / By Joshua Childrey of Feversham in Kent." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A79508.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 17, 2024.
Pages
Page 6
If a Line drawn from the Center of the Earth through the Center of a Planet (this being supposed and grant∣ed that the Earth moves in an Orb above ♀) and so continued do intersect the Zodiack (for examples sake) in the 22 degree of ♋; again, if a Line drawn from the Center of the ☉ through the Center of the same Planet, and continued do intersect the Zodiack in the 29 degree of ♋; certainly the place of that Planet is rather to be accounted the 29 degree of ♋ then the 22, since this determines but his apparent place and quoad nos, that his true place and quoad naturam: And if so, then his point of ☍ will be not the 22 but 29 of ♍, his △ of ♓ and ♏ his □ of ♈ and ♎, and his ✶ not the 22 but 29 of ♉ and ♍. And if so too,