Scepsis scientifica, or, Confest ignorance, the way to science in an essay of The vanity of dogmatizing, and confident opinion : with a reply to the exceptions of the learned Thomas Albius / by Joseph Glanvill ...

About this Item

Title
Scepsis scientifica, or, Confest ignorance, the way to science in an essay of The vanity of dogmatizing, and confident opinion : with a reply to the exceptions of the learned Thomas Albius / by Joseph Glanvill ...
Author
Glanvill, Joseph, 1636-1680.
Publication
London :: Printed by E. Cotes, for Henry Eversden ...,
1665.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
White, Thomas, 1593-1676.
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800.
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"Scepsis scientifica, or, Confest ignorance, the way to science in an essay of The vanity of dogmatizing, and confident opinion : with a reply to the exceptions of the learned Thomas Albius / by Joseph Glanvill ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A70185.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 1, 2024.

Pages

[A.] 2. Capite decimo octavo arguit doctrinam Peripate∣ticam, quasi ad Phaenomena salvanda—pag. 124.

[G.] I Am not yet convinced, but that the Aristotelian Phi∣losophy is insufficient for the Solution of the Phaenome∣na; And yet question not Aristotle's endeavours in that kind, but his success, upon what Accounts my Discourse declareth.

Page 67

I acknowledge the ingenuity of Sir Kenelm Digbye's Hypo∣theseis: But cannot yet understand that to have been Ari∣stotle's method. And I think our Author is one of the first that asserts Aristotle to have taught the Corpuscularian and Atomical Philosophy; for all the World hath hitherto taken his, to be the way of Qualities and Forms: Yea Aristotle mentions the Atomical Hypothesis of Democritus in a way of dissent and profest opposition; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which last pas∣sage is the main substance of the Corpuscularian Philosophy. And elsewhere he recites the same Hypothesis from Leu∣cippus and Democritus, to the same purpose; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.