CONFERENCE CXCIV. What Paracelsus meant by the Book M.
I Shall not stand to consider whether it be true, as some say, that more persons besides Theophrastus ab Ohenheim bore the name of Paracelsus; my present purpose is only to consider a passage lately recited here out of his Archidoxa; At{que} haec omnia (saith he there) parùm vulgaria de Medicina supernaturali & Magica, ex libro secreto ex Arabico idiomate in Latinum ver∣so qui pro titulo habet Literam M. In which words we may observe how remote this Author's manner of Writing is from that of the Doctors of these times; yea, and of former too, (if you except the Chymists) who mainly aim to speak clearly, and to render themselves intelligible, many of them professing to wish that things themselves could speak. From which practise this Author is so far, that he conceals even the Book's name wherein he studied, by a kind of Plagium, hiding his Theft, lest others should trap him; and the same Jealousie runs through all his Works. However, for Curiositie's sake, let us consider what Titles will sute to this Letter. Me-thinks the fittest is Mundus, that great Book, open to all that are minded to read in it; that to which Job, David, and many other Authors sacred and pro∣fane so frequently refer us; each Element whereof is a Tome, every Compound a Book, and every part thereof a Letter. All other Books are only Copies of this Original, to which if they happen to have conformity, they pass for good; if not, they are meer Chimera's, having no foundation in the thing. Hence ari∣seth that so remarkable difference between the Theory and the Practise of Arts; for almost all Books being false Copies of this of the World, no wonder if Book-doctors are most commonly ignorant of Things, whose solid Contemplation produces other satisfaction in the informed Intellect, than do the empty Phansies