The fifteenth Chapter.
Of the punishment of cowardise
I Have heretofore heard a Prince, who was a very great Captaine, hold opinion, that a souldier might not for cowardise of heart be condemned to death: who sitting at his table heard report of the Lord of Veruins sentence, who for yeelding vp of Bollein, was doomed to loose his head. Verily there is reason a man should make a difference betweene faultes proceeding from our weakenesse, and those that grow from our malice. For in the latter we are directly bandied against the rules of reason, which nature hath imprinted in vs; and in the former it seemeth, we may call the same nature, as a warrant, because it hath left-vs in such imperfection and defect. So as divers nations have judged, that no man should blame vs for any thing we doe against our conscience. And the opinion of those which condemne heretikes and miscreants vnto capitall punishments, is partly grounded vpon this rule: and the same which establisheth, that a Iudge or an advocate may not be called to account for any matter committed in their charge through oversight or ignorance. But touching cowardise, it is certain, the common fashion is, to punish the same with ignominie and shame. And some hold that this rule was first put in practise by the Law-giver Charondas, and that before him the lawes of Greece were woont to punish those with death, who for feare did runne away from a Battell: where he onely ordained, that for three daies together, clad in womens attire, they should be made to sit in the market-place: hoping yet to have some service at their hands, and by meanes of this reproch, they might recover their courage a∣gaine.