MOUNTAGU.
SO I say still, I know none. I doe be∣leeve there are, and ever were, Evangeli∣call Counsailes; such as S. PAUL mentio∣neth
Appello Cæsarem A iust appeale from two vniust informers· / By Richard Mountagu.
About this Item
- Title
- Appello Cæsarem A iust appeale from two vniust informers· / By Richard Mountagu.
- Author
- Montagu, Richard, 1577-1641.
- Publication
- London :: Printed by H[umphrey] L[ownes] for Mathew Lownes,
- M.DC.XXV. [1625].
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Yates, John, d. ca. 1660 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Ward, Samuel, 1577-1640 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Church of England. -- Controversial literature -- Anglican authors -- Early works to 1800.
- Cite this Item
-
"Appello Cæsarem A iust appeale from two vniust informers· / By Richard Mountagu." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A68474.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 6, 2024.
Pages
Page 215
in his Consilium autem do; such as our SAVIOUR pointed at and directed unto in his Qui potest capere capiat; such as a man may do or not do, without guilt of sinne, or breach of Law: but nothing lesse than such as the Papists fabricke up unto themselves in their works of Supererogation. It is an error in Di∣vinitie, not to put a difference betwixt such works, and workes done upon counsell and ad∣vice. If any man, not knowing or not con∣sidering the state of the question, hath other∣wise written, or preached, or taught, what is that to me, or the Doctrine of the Church of England? His ignorance, or fancie, or misun∣derstanding, or misapplying, is not the Doc∣trine of Antiquity, which with universall con∣sent held Evangelicall Counsailes; nor of our Church, in which our GAMALIEL hath told us; Quis nescit fieri à nobis multa liberè, & quae à DEO non sunt imperata voveri & reddi? These Promoters knew it not. B. MORTON in his Appeale saith (if he doe not say true, in∣forme against him for it) that we allow the distinction of PRECEPTS and COUNCELS, lib. V. cap. IV. sect. 3. For his sake excuse mee from Popery, who write no more than he did before me: what in GOD'S indulgence is a matter of Counsell; in regard of strict justice, may come under Precept. Cap. IV. Sect. V.
Notes
-
Ad Apol. TORT. pa. 196.