D. Heskins, D. Sanders, and M. Rastel, accounted (among their faction) three pillers and archpatriarches of the popish synagogue (vtter enemies to the truth of Christes Gospell, and all that syncerely professe the same) ouerthrowne, and detected of their seuerall blasphemous heresies. By D. Fulke, Maister of Pembrooke Hall in Cambridge. Done and directed to the Church of England, and all those which loue the trueth.
About this Item
Title
D. Heskins, D. Sanders, and M. Rastel, accounted (among their faction) three pillers and archpatriarches of the popish synagogue (vtter enemies to the truth of Christes Gospell, and all that syncerely professe the same) ouerthrowne, and detected of their seuerall blasphemous heresies. By D. Fulke, Maister of Pembrooke Hall in Cambridge. Done and directed to the Church of England, and all those which loue the trueth.
Author
Fulke, William, 1538-1589.
Publication
At London :: Printed by Henrie Middleton for George Bishop,
Anno. 1579.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Heskyns, Thomas. -- Parliament of Chryste.
Sander, Nicholas, 1530?-1581. -- Treatise of the images of Christ.
Rastell, John, 1532-1577. -- Confutation of a sermon, pronounced by M. Juell.
Rishton, Edward, 1550-1586.
Allen, William, 1532-1594.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A68078.0001.001
Cite this Item
"D. Heskins, D. Sanders, and M. Rastel, accounted (among their faction) three pillers and archpatriarches of the popish synagogue (vtter enemies to the truth of Christes Gospell, and all that syncerely professe the same) ouerthrowne, and detected of their seuerall blasphemous heresies. By D. Fulke, Maister of Pembrooke Hall in Cambridge. Done and directed to the Church of England, and all those which loue the trueth." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A68078.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.
Pages
* 1.1SECTIO. 14. From the second face of the 59. leafe, to the second face of 61. leafe.
* 1.2The bishop saide, the Canon of the masse for manie causes is a verie vaine thinge, and so vncertaine, that no man can redily tell on whom to father it. Notwithstan∣ding the bishoppe saith for many causes, yet Master Ra∣stell taketh exceptions to his argument, as though for the vncertaintie of the author onely, it shoulde be refu∣sed: comparing it most leudely with certaine bookes of holy scripture, the indighters of which, although they be not knowne, yet the onely author is both knowen, and acknowledged to be the holy Ghost. But Pope Innocent the third, saith, it came from the Apostles, other say from Gregory the first, & other from Gregory the thirde. But that it came neither from the Apostles, nor frō Gregory the first, euen that place which M.Ra. citeth out of Greg. lib. 7. ep. 63. doth proue sufficiently. For there Greg. repro∣ueth the order of the liturgie or canon vsed in his time,
descriptionPage 735
because the Lords praier by that order, was not said ouer the sacramēt, as wel as ye praier of Scholasticus. But M.R. will haue Scholasticus to signifie a scholer or disciple of Christ, and not to be a proper name, which is altogether vntrue & vnlikely, for if Greg. had thought any Apostle or disciple of Christ to haue bin ye auctor of it, he would neuer haue takē vpō him to reproue it, & seing he thoght it expediēt yt the lords praier should be said ouer ye sacra∣ment, which is not vsed in the popish canon, it followeth also that Gregorie the first, was not the author of the po∣pish canon. And so it is not prooued to haue bene made within the compasse of sixe hundreth yeres after Christ.