D. Heskins, D. Sanders, and M. Rastel, accounted (among their faction) three pillers and archpatriarches of the popish synagogue (vtter enemies to the truth of Christes Gospell, and all that syncerely professe the same) ouerthrowne, and detected of their seuerall blasphemous heresies. By D. Fulke, Maister of Pembrooke Hall in Cambridge. Done and directed to the Church of England, and all those which loue the trueth.
About this Item
Title
D. Heskins, D. Sanders, and M. Rastel, accounted (among their faction) three pillers and archpatriarches of the popish synagogue (vtter enemies to the truth of Christes Gospell, and all that syncerely professe the same) ouerthrowne, and detected of their seuerall blasphemous heresies. By D. Fulke, Maister of Pembrooke Hall in Cambridge. Done and directed to the Church of England, and all those which loue the trueth.
Author
Fulke, William, 1538-1589.
Publication
At London :: Printed by Henrie Middleton for George Bishop,
Anno. 1579.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Heskyns, Thomas. -- Parliament of Chryste.
Sander, Nicholas, 1530?-1581. -- Treatise of the images of Christ.
Rastell, John, 1532-1577. -- Confutation of a sermon, pronounced by M. Juell.
Rishton, Edward, 1550-1586.
Allen, William, 1532-1594.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"D. Heskins, D. Sanders, and M. Rastel, accounted (among their faction) three pillers and archpatriarches of the popish synagogue (vtter enemies to the truth of Christes Gospell, and all that syncerely professe the same) ouerthrowne, and detected of their seuerall blasphemous heresies. By D. Fulke, Maister of Pembrooke Hall in Cambridge. Done and directed to the Church of England, and all those which loue the trueth." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A68078.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 18, 2024.
Pages
SECTIO. 13. From the first face of the 56. leafe to the 2. face of 59. leafe.
The bishoppe citeth a lawe of Iustinian, that the priest shoulde speake with an audible voice, that the people might say Amen, therefore the people shoulde vnder∣stande what the minister saith: M. Rastel aunswereth to this nothinge, but yt the people do, and may saye Amen, though they vnderstand him not, so long as there is no mistrust in the persons faith & honesty. So that belike, if the priest be a knaue, no man shoulde saye Amen to his
descriptionPage 734
masse. Good stuffe I warrant you. But in that the people said Amen to the priests wordes of consecration, he will prooue like a luftie logician, whiche findeth no reason, but much rethorike in yt bishops sermon, yt they did ex∣clude al figuration, and significatiō of his body. We wil reason no longer, M.R. hath gottē the day, and that with maine logike. And as for the second abuse, of not recei∣uing in both kindes, if it were any abuse, it is the fault (he saith) of the bishops & priests, and not of the masse, which consecrateth in both kinds. But seeing receiuing is made one of the parts of the masse, receiuing in one kind one∣ly, is an abuse of the masse it self. I know he wil answer, the priest receiueth in both kindes. In deede if the sacra∣ment had bene instituted for priests onely, the aunswere had bene somewhat, but if the blood of Christ pertaine to more then priestes, surely the sacrament of his blood shoulde not be denyed to anye, for whome he shedde his blood.