thereupon inacting, that there should no bishop of Rome henceforth be chosen, but by the consent and confirmation of the Emperour. Which constitution though it was both agreable & also necessary for publike trāquilitie of that ci∣tie, yet the Cardinals would not suffer it long to stand, but did impugne it afterward by subtile practise and open vio∣lence, as in processe (the Lord permitting) shal appeare, in the time of Henricus the 4. and 5. In the time of this Cle∣ment, the Romanes made an othe to the Emperour, con∣cerning the election of the Byshops, themselues to enter∣meddle no farther therein, but as the assent of the Empe∣rour should goe with all. Howbeit the Emperour depar∣ting thence into Germanie againe, by and by they forgote their othe, and within 9. monethes after poysoned the Bi∣shop. Which fact some impute to Stephen his successour, called Damasus 2. Some impute it to Brazutus, who (as histories record) within 13. yeares poysoned 6. popes, that is, Clemens 2. Damasus. 2. Leo. 9. Uictor. 2. Stephanus 9. Nicolaus the 2.
Thus Clement being poysoned, after him succeeded Damasus 2. neither by consent of the people, nor of the em∣perour elected: but by force and inuasion, who a••so within 23. daies being poisoned. An. 1049. much contention and striuing began in Rome about the Papal seat. Wherupon the Romans, through the counsel of the Cardinals, sent to the foresaid Emperor, desiring to geue them a bishop, and so he did, whose name was Bruno an Almain, and bishop of Colle••, afterwarde called Leo 9. This Bruno being a simple man and easie to be led with euil counsel, comming from the Emperour towards Rome in his pontificall ap∣parell like a Pope: meeteth him by the way the Abbot of Cluniake, and Hildebrand a monke. Who seing him so in his pontificalibus, begā to rate him, laying to his charge, that he would so take his authoritie of the Emperour, and not rather of the Clergy of Rome & the people thereof, as other his predecessors were wont to doe: and so counselled him, to lay downe that apparel, and to enter in wt his own habite, till he had hys election by them. Bruno following their counsel, and confessing his fault before the Clergie of Rome, obtained their fauor, and so was nominate Leo 9. wherby Hildebrand was made a Cardinall, & put in high rowme. Under this Pope Leo were two Councels, one kept at Uercellis, where the doctrine of Berengarius a∣gainst the reall substance in the Sacrament was first con∣demned, although Berengarius yet recanted not, whych neuerthelesse was done after in the Councel of Lateran••, vnder Nicolas 2. An. M.lx. The other was kept at Mo∣guntia, where amongst many other decrees was enacted, priests to be excluded and debarred vtterly from mariage▪ Item, that no lay men might geue benefice, or bishoprick, or any spirituall promotion. &c.
This Leo, being at Wormes wt the Emperour vpon Christmas day, did excommunicate the subdeacon because in reading the Epistle, he did it not in the Romane tune, he being there present. The Archbishop moued therewith, departed from the altare (being then at Masse) saying, he woulde not proceede no farther in his seruice, vnlesse hys subdeacon were restored. Wherupon the Pope commāded him to be released, & so they went forward in their seruice.
After the death of Leo, whom Brazutus poysoned the first yere of his popedome. Theophilactus did striue to be Pope: but Hildebrand to defeat him, went to the emperor, (partly also being sent by ye Romanes for feare of the Em∣perours displeasure) who assigned an other bishop, a Ger∣maine, called Uictor 2. This Uictor hauing a Councell at Florence, deposed diuers Bishops and Priestes, for simo∣ny and fornicatiō. For simony, in that they tooke of secular men their dignities for money: for fornication, in that con∣trary to their Canon, they were maried. &c. The 2. yeare of his papacie and little more, this Pope also followed his predecessours being poysoned by the foresaide Brazutus, through the procurement of Hildebrand and his maister.
Here now began the Church and Clergie of Rome, to wring out of the emperours hand the election of the pope: electing Stephen the 9. for pope, contrary to their oth and to the Emperours assignement. Here was the Churche of Millan first brought to obedience of the Romish Church, by this Stephanus the 9. bishop of Rome. Who also sha∣med not to accuse the Emperor Henry (of whom mention is made before) of heresy: for minishing the authority of the Romane sea. So this was their heresie at that time, not to maintaine the ambitious proceedings of the Romish pre∣late. And simonie they called this, to take & enioy any spi∣rituall liuing at a secular mans hand. Wherefore Stephen hearing this simonie to raigne in diuers places, namely in the Churches of Burgundy and Italy, sent foorth the Cardinal Hildebrand to reforme the matter: who was no lesse earnest in that kinde of commission to help the matter forwarde.
In the meane time Stephanus ye pope, tasting of Bra∣zutus cup fel sick. Hildebrand hearing that, applieth home wt all post speede. So being returned to Rome, assembleth all the companies and orders of the Clergy together, ma∣king thē to sweare: that they should admit none to be By∣shop, but which should be appointed by the publike cōsent of them altogether. This being done, Hildebrande taketh his iorney to Florēce (belike to fetch the bishop of Florēce) to stal him bishop: the clergy swearing to him, that no bi∣shop shuld be ordained before his returne againe. But the people of Rome not suffering the election to stand so long, after the death of Stephan: elected one of their owne citie, called Benedictus the 10. Hildebrand hearing of this, was not a little offended: wherefore returning to Rome wyth one Gerhardus bishop of Florēce, caused ye clergy to pro∣cede to a newe election, saying: that Benedictus was not lawfully called but came in by force & bribing. But ye cler∣gie not daring to attempt any new election at Rome, wēt to Sene, and there elected this Garhardus bishop of Flo∣rence, whome Hildebrande brought with him. So were 2. popes in Rome together: But Garhardus named Ni∣colaus 2. holding a councel at Sutrium, through the helpe of Duke Godfride and Guibert, and other bishops about Italie, caused the other Pope to be deposed. Benedictus vnderstanding them to be set against him through ye means of Hildebrand, vnpoped himself, and went to Uelitras, li∣uing there more quietly thē he shuld haue done at Rome.
Here is to be touched by the way, the error of the glose vpon the 23. dist. which falsly alledgeth out of the Chroni∣cles, yt Benedictus 10. which succeeded Stephen, was de∣posed: after whō came Ioannes bishop of Sabine for mo∣ney, & he againe deposed. Benedictus was then restored, and after displaced againe, and then Ioannes Archdeacon ad portam latinam, was made Pope, and he againe deposed by the Emperor, and all this wtin one yere. Which history neither is founde in any Chronicle, nor agreeth vpon any Benedictus, saue only that Benedictus 9. was deposed, & then reigned 3. popes together, Benedictus 9. Siluester 3. & Gregorius 6. which before was called Ioannes ad portam latinam, whome the Emperor deposed (all three together.) But that Benedict neither was the 10. neither did hee suc∣ceede pope Stephen, as the glose recordeth. Nicolas thus being set vp without the minde both of the emperour, & of the people of Rome, after his fellow Pope was driuen a∣way: brake vp the Synode of Sutrium, & came to Rome, where he assembled an other councel, called concilium Late∣ranum. In which councel first was promulgate the terrible sentence of excommunication mentioned in the decrees, & beginneth: In nomine Domini nostri. &c. The effect whereof is this. First, that he after a subtile practise (as farre and as plainly as he durst speake) vndermindeth the Emperours iurisdiction, and transferreth to a few Cardinals, and cer∣taine Catholike persons, the full authoritie of chusing the Pope. Secondly, against all such as do creepe into the seat of Peter, by money or fauoure wtout the full consent of the Cardinals: he thūdreth with terrible blasts of excommu∣nication, accursing them and their children with deuils, as wicked persons to the anger of almighty god, geuing also authoritie and power to Cardinals, with the Clergie and laitie, to depose all such persons, and cal a councel general, wheresoeuer they wil against them.
Item, in the sayde Councell of Laterane, vnder Pope Nicholas the seconde, Berengarius Andegauensis, an Arch∣deacon was driuen to the recantation of his doctrine, de∣nying the reall substance of Christes holy body and bloud to be in the Sacrament, otherwise then sacramentally and in mysterie.
In the same councell also was hatched & inuented, the new found deuise and terme of Transubstantiation.
It were to long heere to declare the confederation be∣twixt this Nicholas, and Robertus Guiscardus: whome this pope (cōtrary to all right and good law, displacing the right heire) made Duke of Apulia, Calabria, Sicilia, and captain general of S. Peters lands: that through his force of armes and violence, he might the better subdue all such as should rebell to his obedience, and so did. Nowe let all men iudge & vnderstand (which be godly wise) howe this standeth wt the doctrine of Christ, the example of Peter, or the spirit of a christen bishop, by ourward armes & violēce to conquer christen men & countreis, vnder the obedience of a bishops sea. Thus Pope Nicolas the 2. well aunswe∣ring to his Greeke name: by might and force continued 3. yeres and a halfe. But at length he mette with Brazutus cup, and so turned vp his heeles.
At the beginning of this Nicolas, or somewhat before,