Iohn Badby a lay man, of the sayd Dioces of Worcester, appearing personally, before the reuerend father in Christ and Lord, Lord Thomas, by the grace of God Byshop of Worcester, sitting in ye said Chappell for chiefe Iudge, was detected of and vpon the crime of heresie, being heretically taught, & openly maintayned by the foresayd Iohn Bad∣by. That is, that the Sacrament of the body of Christ, con∣secrated by the Priest vpon the aulter, is not the true body of Christ, by the vertue of the wordes of the Sacrament. But that after the Sacramentall words spoken by the Priest to make the body of Christ: the materiall bread doth remaine vpon the aulter as in the beginning, neither is it turned into the very body of Christ after the Sacramental words spoken of the Priest. Which Iohn Badby, being examined and diligently demanded by the foresaid reuerēd father cōcerning the premisses, in the end did answere: that it was impossible that any Priest should make the body of Christ, & that he beleued firmely that no Priest could make the body of Chrst by such words Sacramentally spoken in such sort. And also he said expressely, that he would neuer while he liued beleue, that any Priest could make the body of Christ sacramentally, vnlesse that first he saw manifest∣lie the like body of Christ to be handled in the hands of the priest vpon the aulter, in his corporall forme. And further∣more he sayd, that Iohn Rakier of Bristoll had so much power & authoritie to make the like body of Christ, as any priest had. Moreouer he said, that whē Christ sat at supper with his disciples: he had not his body in his hand, to the intent to distribute it to his disciples: and he said expresly, that he did not this thing. And also he spake many other words teaching & fortifieng the heresie in the same place, both greeuous, and also out of order, and horrible to the eares of the hearers, sounding against the Catholike faith.
Upon which occasion, the same reuerend father admo∣nished and requested the said Iohn Badby oftentimes, and very instantlie to charity: for so much as he would willinglie that he should haue forsaken such heresie and o∣pinion, holden, taught, and mainteined by him, in such sort against the Sacrament, to renounce and vtterly abiure them, and to beleeue other things which the holy mother the Church doth beleeue. And he informed the said Iohn on that behalfe both gentlie, and also laudably. Yet the said Iohn Badby, although he were admonished and re∣quested both often and instantlie by the said reuerend fa∣ther: said and answered expresselie, that he would neuer beleeue otherwise then before he had said, taught, and an∣swered. Wherevpon, the foresaid reuerend father Bishop of Worcester, seeing, vnderstanding, and perceiuing the foresaid Iohn Badby to maintaine and fortifie the said be∣resie, being stubborne, and proceeding in the same stubbor∣nes: pronounced the said Iohn to be before this time con∣uicted of such an heresie, and that he hath bin, and is an he∣reticke, and in the end declared it in these words.
In the name of God, Amen. We Thomas Bishop of Wor∣cester, do accuse thee Iohn Badby being a lay man of our Dioces, of and vpon the crime of heresie before vs, sitting for cheese iudge, being oftentimes confessed and conuicted of and vpon that, that thou hast taught and openly affirmed, as hetherto thou doest teach, boldly affirme, and defend: that the Sacrament of the body of Christ, consecrated vpon the aulter by the Priest, is not the true body of Christ: But after the Sacramental words to make the body of Christ by vertue of the said Sacramentall words pro∣nounced, to haue bin in the crime of heresie: and we do pro∣nounce thee, both to haue bene, and to be an heretike, and do de∣clare it finallie by these writings.
These things were done accordingly as is aboue writ∣ten and are recited in the yeare, indiction, popedome, mo∣neth, day and place aforesaid, being present the same time, Iohn Malune Prior of the Cathedrall Church of Worce∣ster, Iohn Dudle Mōke, and Iohn Haule the supprior of the said Church, Thomas Penings of the order of the Carmelites, Thomas Fekenham of the order of the prea∣ching Friers, William Pomfret of the order of the Mino∣rites, being professors and maisters in diuinitie, William Hailes, Gualter of London, Iohn Swippedew beeing publique Notaries, and William Beuchampe and Tho∣mas Gerbris being Knights, Richard wish of Treding∣ton, Thomas Wilbe of Dentbury, Iohn Weston of Yew∣ley, being parsons of Churches, and Thomas Baleinges, the maister of Saint Wolstone in Worcester, and also Henry Haggely, Iohn Penerell, Thomas Trogmorton and William Wasseborne Esquiers of the Dioces of Wor∣cester and Norwich, and many other worshipfull and ho∣nest men being witnesses and called speciallye to the things aforesaid.
And I Iohn Chew Clerke, of the Dioces of Bath and Welles, and by the authoritie apostolicall, publique Nota∣rie of the said Bishop: haue in testimonie of the premisses, put my hand & seale to the examination, interrogatiō, mo∣nition, and aunswere of the same Iohn Badby, and to his obstinacie: & also to the procedings of al and singular other doings as is aforesaid, which against him before the sayd bishop were handled & done, in the yeare, indiction, pope∣dome, moneth, day, and place aforesaid, which with the forenamed witnesses was personally present: and y• same, euen as I heard them and saw them to be done (being oc∣cupied with other matters) caused them to be written and published, and into this publique forme haue compiled the same. I the foresayd Notary am also priuie, vnto the words and examinations interlined betweene seauen or eight lines of y• beginning of this instrument, which lines I also the foresaide Notary doe approoue and make good.
And I Walter London Clerke, of the Dioces of Wor∣cester, and by the authoritie Apostolicall, publique Nota∣rie: to all and singular the foresaid things as afore by the foresaid Notary is recited, & in the yeare, indiction, pope∣dome, moneth, day, and place aforesaid were handled and done, being with other the fore recited witnesses personal∣ly present: and to all & euery of the same (as I saw & heard them to be done, being thereunto faithfully desired and re∣quired.) In testimony of the premisses, haue signed & sub∣scribed according to ye accustomed maner. Haec ex Reg. Cant.
And when the articles, in the foresaid instrument con∣tained, were by the Archbishop of Canterbury publiquely and vulgarly read and approued: he publiquely cōfessed & affirmed, that he had both said and mainteined the same. And then the Archbishop to conuince the cōstant purpose of the said Iohn Badby, commanded the same articles a∣gaine to be read, often instructing him both by words and examples, informing and exhorting him that thereby he might be brought the sooner to the Religion that he was of. And furthermore, the said Archbyshop sayd and affir∣med there openly to the same Iohn: that he would (if he would liue according to the doctrine of Christ) gage his soule for him at the iudgement day. And after that againe he caused those articles in the said instrument expressed, to be read by the foresaid Phillip Morgan, & the said Arch∣byshop himselfe expounded the same in English as before: wherunto Iohn Badby aunswered. As touching the first article concerning the body of Christ, he expresly sayd, that after ye consecration at the aulter, there remaineth materi∣all bread, & the same bread which was before: notwithstā∣ding (said he) it is a signe or sacrament of the liuing God.
Also; wen the second article was expounded vnto him, that it is impossible for anie Priest &c. To this article he answered and said, that it could not sinke into his minde that the words are to be taken as they litterallie lie, vnles he should denie the incarnation of Christ.
Also, being examined of the third Article concerning Iacke Raker, he said: That if Iacke Raker were a man of good liuing, and did loue and feare God, that he hath as much power so to do, as hath the Priest: and said further, that he hath heard it spoken of some doctors of diuinitie, that if he should receiue any such consecrated bread, he were worthy to be damned, & were damned in so doing.
Furthermore he sayd that he would beleue the omnipo∣tent God in trusitie, and said moreouer that if euery hoste being consecrated at the aulter were the Lords body, that then there be 20000. gods in England. But he beleeued (he said) in one God omnipotent, which thing the fore∣said Archb. of Cant. denied not.
And when the other conclusion was expounded. That Christ sitting with his Disciples at supper, &c. To this he answered and said that he would greatly maruell: that if anie man had a loafe of bread, and should breake the same and giue to euery man a mouthfull, that the same loafe should afterwards be whole.
When all these things were thus finished, and that all the said conclusions were often red in the vulgar tong: the foresaid Archb. demaunded of him, whether he would re∣nounce and forsake his opiniōs and such like conclusions or not, and adhere to the doctrine of Christ and Catholike faith? He answered, that according to that he had sayd be∣fore, he would adhere and stand to those words, which be∣fore he had made answere vnto. Then the Archb. often∣times required the said Iohn in the bowels of Iesu Christ that he would forsake those opinions and conclusions, and that hencefoorth he would cleane to the christian faith: which thing to do in the audience of all the lords and o∣thers that were present, he expresly denied and refused.
After all this, when the foresayd Archbishop of Cant. & the Bishop of London had consulted together, to what safe keping the said Iohn Badby (vntill the wednesdaie next) might be committed: It was cōcluded, that he shold