The accomplish'd courtier consisting of institutions and examples, by which courtiers and officers of state may square their transactions prudently, and in good order and method / by H.W. Gent.
About this Item
Title
The accomplish'd courtier consisting of institutions and examples, by which courtiers and officers of state may square their transactions prudently, and in good order and method / by H.W. Gent.
Author
Refuge, Eustache de, d. 1617.
Publication
London :: Printed for Thomas Dring ...,
1660.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Courts and courtiers -- Early works to 1800.
Favorites, Royal -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The accomplish'd courtier consisting of institutions and examples, by which courtiers and officers of state may square their transactions prudently, and in good order and method / by H.W. Gent." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A66933.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 21, 2024.
Pages
descriptionPage 18
CHAP. VII.
The Argument.
How, when, and with whom, a man may use Flattery.
The condition of true, and free Adulation. The
necessity of Assentation and flattering.
1. IT cannot otherwise be but Flattery must be
used with such dispositioned Princes as have
been spoken of, that so a man may oblige them. But
this is not to be done after any manner of way; for,
a too sordid and servile Adulation and flattery
displeased even Tiberius; who was heard when he
went out of the Court to speake in Greek to this
effect (O men fitted for servitude). They are the
words of Tacitus in the 3 of his Annals.
2. Flattery usurped and too often used becomes
as hurtfull as when omitted and neglected. For it
many times happens that he whom we manifestly
flatter, suspects us of deceit and craftiness towards
himselfe. It is the judgment of Aesohines and
Plutarch, that flattery ought to have something of
truth, and of the species and shaddow of liberty and
freedome; that so we may perswade not onely the
Prince, but others, that we speake cordially, and
thereby conserve our Credit and Esteeme with
them.
3. Croesus in the time of his reigne had through∣ly
learned the Ingenies, and inclinations of kings,
and what would please, or displease them: for
when on a time Cambyses king of the Persians had
enquired of those that stood about him, what
descriptionPage 19
they judged of him in Comparison of his father
Cyrus, and all had consented that he was greater
then Cyrus, because he had added Egyp••, with the
Command of the Sea to his paternall kingdome:
but when Croesus his turne came to speake, he
adjudged him inferiour farre to Cyrus, because as
then he had begotten none like to himselfe. This
answer seemed to savour somewhat of freedome,
and was therefore the more satisfactory to Cam∣byses
his vanity then the rest.
4. Notable was the flattery of Valerius Messala
reported by Tacitus in the first of his Annals,
Messala Vale ius, saith he, added this that the Sacra∣mentall
Oath was yeerly to be renewed in Tiberius
his name. And being asked of Tiberius whether
or no he had uttered this Sentence of his own head
answered that he spoke ir spontaneously and that
in those things which concerned the publique, he
could use no other Counsell then his owne with∣out
hazzard of offence, and so there remained
nought but the species or shew of flattery.
5. Like to this is that which the same Tacitus
reports of Ateius Capito in the third of his Annals.
That Lucius Ennius a Roman Knight being accu∣sed
of Treason in that he had coyned into money
a Promiscuous Effigies of the Prince, Caesar
quashes and countermands the accusation, Ateius
Capito openly slights the business out of a kind of
freedome (for neither ought the power of judging
and determining be taken away from States-men
and Counsellors neither ought such an evill Acti∣on
to passe unpunished) was not much troubled
thereat, lest he should thereby permit an injury
to be done to the Common-wealth.
descriptionPage 20
6. It were easie to bring other examples of this
kind; but those that have been produced, may suf∣fice
to instruct such, on whom a necessity of
Adulation and Flattery is imposed. And lest such
mens flattery should be conjoyned with pub∣lique
or private discommodity, it's sufficient
that it be sometimes satisfie the vanity of the
Prince.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.