Theodulia, or, A just defence of hearing the sermons and other teaching of the present ministers of England against a book unjustly entituled (in Greek) A Christian testimony against them that serve the image of the beast, (in English) A Christian and sober testimony against sinful complyance, wherein the unlawfulness of hearing the present ministers of England is pretended to be clearly demonstrated by an author termed by himself Christophilus Antichristomachus / by John Tombes.

About this Item

Title
Theodulia, or, A just defence of hearing the sermons and other teaching of the present ministers of England against a book unjustly entituled (in Greek) A Christian testimony against them that serve the image of the beast, (in English) A Christian and sober testimony against sinful complyance, wherein the unlawfulness of hearing the present ministers of England is pretended to be clearly demonstrated by an author termed by himself Christophilus Antichristomachus / by John Tombes.
Author
Tombes, John, 1603?-1676.
Publication
London :: Printed by E. Cotes for Henry Eversden ...,
1667.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Douglas, Thomas, fl. 1661. -- Martyrion Christianon, or, A Christian and sober testimony against sinfull complyance.
Church of England -- Apologetic works.
Dissenters, Religious -- Controversial literature.
Cite this Item
"Theodulia, or, A just defence of hearing the sermons and other teaching of the present ministers of England against a book unjustly entituled (in Greek) A Christian testimony against them that serve the image of the beast, (in English) A Christian and sober testimony against sinful complyance, wherein the unlawfulness of hearing the present ministers of England is pretended to be clearly demonstrated by an author termed by himself Christophilus Antichristomachus / by John Tombes." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62876.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.

Pages

Page 357

Sect. 11. The example of the learned godly Nonconformists is some inducement to hear the present Ministers.

Object. 7. But many learned and good men (and such as in Con∣science could not conform to the Ceremonies of the Church of Eng∣land) have in dayes past (and do now) hear the present Mini∣sters thereof. To which we answer, 1. That the greatest Scholars, and most accomplished for humane wisdom, parts, yea visible holi∣ness, have not been alwayes on the Lords side, following him in paths of his own appointment; but many times have been found the greatest persecutors and opposers of Christ; the most stupendiously ignorant of the will of God, in respect of the truth, and work of their generation, of any persons in the world: witness the Scribes and Pharisees, the learned Rabbies, and profound Doctors of that day, with what virulency did they oppose Christ and the doctrine of the Gospel preached by him? 2. That persons of as great holiness, and renown for learning, and all manner of accomplishments, as learned Ainsworth, Cotton, &c. have been and are of the same ap∣prehension with us in this matter: not to mention the reformed Churches, who generally renounce the Ministry of the Church of Eng∣land, not admitting any by vertue of it to the charge of Souls (as they speak.) But 3. To the Law and to the Testimony, Isa. 8.20. if they speak not according to this rule, though Angels for know∣ledge and holiness, they are not to be received or heeded: one word from the Lord is of more weight to hearts made truly tender, than the example of an hundred professors can be: 'tis possible these may err, be yea and nay; but so cannot the truth of God, which is alwayes the same, and will abide so for ever. 4. The Apostle hath long since determined this case, 1 Cor. 11.1. Be ye followers of me, as I am of Christ: so far as Saints follow Christ, I may and ought to follow them, but no further: so that the learning parts or holiness of any that attend upon the present Ministers of England, is no warrant for me so to do; nor will ever be a satisfactory an∣swer to that enquiry, who hath required these things at your hands?

I reply, It is not denied, that the most learned and zealous of the law, such as St. Paul among the Jews, the most excellent Moralists among the Gentiles, have been great enemies to the Gospel afore their calling to the faith of Christ, but the objection is of learned and good men among Christians, who are never found the greatest persecutors and opposers of Christ. Possibly it may fall out, yea

Page 358

and it hath fallen out, that among Christians the greatest Scholars, and most acomp••••shed for humane parts, wisdoms, yea for visible holiness, have not been alwayes on the Lords side, following him in paths of his own appointment, but have been stupendiously ignorant of the will of God in respect of the truth and work of their genera∣tion; I think ardinal Caietan was one of the greatest Scholars of his time, yet saw not what Luther saw, about justification by faith, and Luther, though he did much in that point, yet saw not so much as Calvin in the point of the rel presence in the Eucharist; and therefore (like well the 3d. and 4h. answer here, that we should adhere only to the Law and to the Testimony and be followers of the learned as they are of Christ. Yet I conceive, that it is a wicked course, which is taken by some, so to disparage learning, as if it were of no necessity, Universities, as of no use, but rather Seminaries of ungodliness, to say that men that have humane learning are the un∣learned and unstable, which do wrest the Scriptures, 2 Pet. 3.16. as How the Cobler a much followed Preacher a great while ago in Lon∣don vented in print, that learned Scholars do make the Scriptures as a nose of wax, are but Juglers, and deceivers, which are too too often insinuated into the minds of well meaning, but weak minds, whereby they are more addicted to such as How, Tillinghast, and other po∣pular Orators, and their injudicious discourses, if stuffed with fained words and earnest affections, then to the most solid proofs of the most learned, whose interpretations of Scripture, and handling of Controversies, have cleared the truth, and restored purity of Do∣ctrine to the great benefit of the Church of God, which these peo∣ple understand not. But it hapneth according to the saying, Scien∣tia nminem hab•••• inimicum nisi ignorantem. And sure though I would have no Christian enslave his judgement to any man, it were that Anthropolatria or sin of glorying in men forbidden, 1 Cor. 3.21. against which I printed a little treatise in the the year 1645▪ fore∣seeing it would be the means of dividing Christians into parties; nor would I have that which is propounded by men of none or lesser learning rejected, because it is from them, one Paphutius may see that truth, which a whole Council, though such as the first Ncene, without him did not discern, it was an evil spirit in Matthaeus Lan∣gius, that made him disdain to be taught by Luther, as is related in the History of th Council of rent, God doth out of the mouth of Babes and Sucklings perfect praise, as our Saviour Matth. 21.16. allegeth Psal. 8.2. against the Priests and Scribes indignation at the Childrens saying Hosanna: yet I would have such things exa∣mined by the learned, and godly, especially either their own Pastors,

Page 359

or such as are found or reputed learned and judicious, and that as well what may be said against, as what is said for the thing vented be weighed, lest persons deceive themselves, as too often they do, by their propensity to take all for Oracles, which is said by such as they do affect or magnifie. And surely in doubtful cases, and in points which are above the Sphere of common capacities to deter∣mine, I mean such as require more insight in Languages, History, Arts, and other reading, than they can reach to by reason of defect in their natural abilities, educations, time to study, means of attain∣ing the use of books, health or strength, it is a safe way to rest on the received practice and determination of their learned Guides, whom they have reason to judge faithfull and able, and to be satis∣fied with their resolutions and reasons after a serious and modest ar∣guing of the thing, though every scruple be not removed. As for that which is here said of Ainsworth, Cotton, &c. I think they that knew, and read what Vssher, Ball, Gataker, and such like men were, will not believe it. Mr. Ainsworths differences between him and Johnson, Robinson▪ and Paget, and their writings, especially of this last, shew him to have been much short of what this Author conceived of him. What Mr. Cotton was I do not rely upon Mr. Baylies Dissuasive, but I think Dr. Twisse his answer to him about reprobation, Mr. Cawdrey about the keyes, that I mention no other, shewed him not such, as whose judgement might be safely rested in. And I scarce think either by the reading of his way of the Churches in new England, or his commendation of Mr. Nortons answer to Apollonius he could be of the same apprehension with this Author in this matter. That the Reformed Churches generally re∣nounce the Ministry of the Church of England, I think is a manifest untruth. The passages at the Synod of Dort, Peter Moulin his Letter to Bishop Andrews, with many more of the like evidences of former and later times assure me this Author is deceived. He adds.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.