The Quakers quibbles in three parts : first set forth in an expostulatory epistle to Will. Pfnn [i.e. Penn] concerning the late meeting held to Barbycan between the Baptists and the Quakers, also the pretended prophet Lod. Muggleton and the Quakers compared : the second part, in reply to a quibbling answer to G. Whiteheads, entituled The Quakers plainness ... : the third part, being a continuation of their quibbles ... / by the same indifferent pen.

About this Item

Title
The Quakers quibbles in three parts : first set forth in an expostulatory epistle to Will. Pfnn [i.e. Penn] concerning the late meeting held to Barbycan between the Baptists and the Quakers, also the pretended prophet Lod. Muggleton and the Quakers compared : the second part, in reply to a quibbling answer to G. Whiteheads, entituled The Quakers plainness ... : the third part, being a continuation of their quibbles ... / by the same indifferent pen.
Author
Thompson, Thomas.
Publication
London :: Printed for F. Smith ...,
1675.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Muggleton, Lodowick, 1609-1698.
Whitehead, George, 1636?-1723. -- Quakers plainness defecting fallacy.
Society of Friends -- Controversial literature.
Cite this Item
"The Quakers quibbles in three parts : first set forth in an expostulatory epistle to Will. Pfnn [i.e. Penn] concerning the late meeting held to Barbycan between the Baptists and the Quakers, also the pretended prophet Lod. Muggleton and the Quakers compared : the second part, in reply to a quibbling answer to G. Whiteheads, entituled The Quakers plainness ... : the third part, being a continuation of their quibbles ... / by the same indifferent pen." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A62427.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 1, 2024.

Pages

Page 8

SECT. II. The Quakers Quibbles about Set-days and Set-places.

Sect. 1. PRinciples of Truth, p. 42. per E. Burroughs, We believe his True Wor∣ship required and accepted of him, is not by the Tra∣dition of Men, in outward Observances, or Set-days, or Places, but he is Worshipped onely in Spi∣rit and Truth without respect of Times, Places, or Things. And this was (one while) the Quakrs ge∣neral Doctrine, that they should not run, nor be enjoyned by others to come to Meetings, but as they re moved of the Lord thereto, and that without that, it was but Will-Worship: See Principles of Truth, p. 24. & 51. Every Man ought to be left FREE as the Lord shall perswade his own mind in doing, or leaving undone this or th' other practice in Religion.

Sect. 2. But to whirle about, and run round again, at other times, P. Livingstone can tell you, Idem, p. 5.

It is a dark Spirit, clearness and FREEDOM is not in it, but it hath, and doth lead into Bondage. — And here Satan by Trans∣forming himself hath obtained his End and pur∣pose in such, for which cause he first Transformed himself in the matter of the Hat and the Hand, and not coming to Meetings, until they should be moved of the Lord, untill at last he obtained his end to get them not to come at all, and not to

Page 9

let them rest therewith, but also made, and makes them believe lyes; as namely, that they be mo∣ved of the Lord to cry against Meetings, &c. And we are certain enough what that Spirit leads to in the end (for all its fair appearance) if it be followed to the end, &c.

And who now Observes more their set-days and hours too, their first, and fourth days meeting, and set places Built on purpose (a the Bull and Mouth, and Grace-Church-street, &c.) than the Quakers? And thus are they run into Forms as those whom they once condemned, and now deny that FREE∣DOM they once allowed and cry'd for; which is all but a Quibble.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.