A congregational church is a catholike visible church, or, An examination of M. Hudson his vindication concerning the integrality of the catholike visible church wherein also satisfaction is given to what M. Cawdrey writes touching that subject, in his review of M. Hooker's Survey of church discipline / by Samuel Stone ...
About this Item
Title
A congregational church is a catholike visible church, or, An examination of M. Hudson his vindication concerning the integrality of the catholike visible church wherein also satisfaction is given to what M. Cawdrey writes touching that subject, in his review of M. Hooker's Survey of church discipline / by Samuel Stone ...
Author
Stone, Samuel, 1602-1663.
Publication
London :: Printed by Peter Cole ...,
1652.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Cawdrey, Daniel, 1588-1664. -- Inconsistencie of the independent way.
Hudson, Samuel, 17th cent. -- Vindication of the essence and unity of the church catholike visible.
Church polity.
Cite this Item
"A congregational church is a catholike visible church, or, An examination of M. Hudson his vindication concerning the integrality of the catholike visible church wherein also satisfaction is given to what M. Cawdrey writes touching that subject, in his review of M. Hooker's Survey of church discipline / by Samuel Stone ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61677.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 8, 2024.
Pages
THESIS. VIII.
Logicians will grant, that individuum est species. Not onely Ramus, Ber∣husius
Snellius, Gutberleth, &c. but Aristotle will grant it: He testifyeth that
the last and lowest generall kindes are next above the individualls, as man is
Arist. lib. 3. above individuall men. Extrema, seu ultima g••nera supra indivi-Metaph.
c. 4. dua sunt, ut Homo. I might easily name severall Authors who
descriptionPage [unnumbered]
conceive, that Homo is the Genus of Individuall men, and that individuall men
are species. But those are onely inducements, not convincements, being onely
inartificiall Arguments. We shall therefore (having propounded these prepa∣ratives
and expl••ations, somwhat helping to understand the Cause in hand)
present some Artificiall Arguments and reasons for the demonstration of this
truth, that
Individuum est Species.
Singular Lyons are species of lyon in generall. Socrates, Cicero, Aristotle,
Solomon, Plato &c. are Species of Homo.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.