[ 1553] Naturall perswasions, the invalidity of them in the point of true believing.
A Roman writ to Tully,* 1.1 to inform him in something concerning the Immorta∣lity of the Soul; Tully writ back again unto him, Evolve librum Platonis, et nihil amplius est quod desideres, Read, saith he, but Plato upon the same subject, and you will desire no more; The Roman returned him answer, Evolvi, iterum at{que} evolvi, &c. I have read it over, saith he, again and again, but I know not whence it is, when I read it, I assent unto it; but I have no sooner laid the book out of my hand, but I begin to doubt again, Whether the Soul be Immortal yea or no. So it is with all perswasion from Natural principles, as to that extent of Doctrine it would perswade us of, the perswasion that ariseth from them is faint and very weak; It is true, that Nature hath principles to