Page 67
CHAP. IX.
In King Stephen's Reign all was to pieces. Abundance of Castles built. Of the priviledge of Coining. Appeals to the Court of Rome now set on foot. The Roman Laws brought in, but disowned. An instance in the Wonder-working Parliament.
AS of old, unless the Shields were laid up, there was no Dancing at Weddings; so except Arms be put aside, there is no pleading of Laws. That Antipathy betwixt Arms and Laws, England was all over sensible of, if ever at any time, in the Reign of K. STEPHEN, Count of Blois, King Henry's Nephew by his Sister Adela. For he did not only break the Law and his Oath too to get a Kingdom, but also being sa∣luted King, by those who perfidiously opposed Mawd the right and true heir of King Henry, he reigned with an improved wickedness.
For he did so strangely and odly chop and change every thing (it is Malms∣bury speaks it) as if he had sworn only for this intent, that he might shew himself to the whole Kingdom, a Dodger and Shammer of his Oath.But, as he saith,
—perjuros merito perjuria fallunt?that is,
Such men as Perjuries do make their Trade, By their own Perjuries most justly are betray'd.They are things of custom to which he swore, and such as whereby for∣mer priviledges are ratifed, rather than new ones granted. However, some things there are, that may be worth the transcribing.
41.
Castles were frequently raised ('tis Nubrigensis relates it) in the several Counties by the bandying of parties; and there were in En∣gland in a manner as many Kings, or rather as many Tyrants, as Lords of Castles, having severally the stamping of their own Coin, and a power of giving Law to the Subjects after a Royal manner.Then was the Kingdom plainly torn to pieces, and the right of Majesty shattered, which gains to it self not the least lustre from stamping of Money. Though I know very well, that before the Normans, in the City of Ro∣chester, Canterbury, and in other Corporations and Towns, Abbots and Bishops had by right of priviledge their Stampers and Coiners of Money.
42. Next to the King, Theobald Arch Bishop of Canterbury presided over the Council of London (where there were also present the Peers of the Realm) which buzzed with new appeals.
For in England (tis Henry of Huntington sayes it) appeals were not in use, till Henry Bishop of Winchester, when he was Legate, cruelly intruded them to his own mischief.Wherefore what Cardinal Bellarmin has writ, be∣ginning