Page 2
My Old Friend!
I Received yours, and have considered of your Motion for my Vote. I confess I have one to give, and am resolv'd to bestow it on an honest Gentleman, if I can. Your Friend may be so, for any thing I know; but the Character you give of him in your Letter is not so taking with me, as peradventure you think it is, as to fetch me ten Miles to Vote for him. You tell me he is a Moderate man: what you mean by that piece of your Character I do not know; whether you mean it as to the King, or the establisht Government in Church, it matters not; he cannot be a fit man for this Election, when the most zealous men for King and Church are the fittest now to secure us from those Plots that are on all sides against Monarchy and Episcopacy, and to defend us from a Commonwealth-Government in the State, and Presbytery or worse in the Church; both which are so plainly drove at and in∣tended: and I fear your Moderate men will rather pull down, than keep up and preserve the present Establishments amongst us. I my self have felt and seen too much mischief by a Change in Government, ever to give my Aid and Assistance a Second time to its Alteration or Downfal. I formerly have been inclin'd to believe Moderation would be the best way to preserve the Government in Church and State, and beget the King and Church many Friends, and confirm and secure them for ever. But sad experience hath found the contrary; and nothing hath ruin'd All, and made the Enemies of our Government so high, so sawcy and insolent, as Lenity. Had they bin kept at first to their Duty and Allegiance, and felt the Effects of Dis∣obedience, they would not have grown to such a Formidable Height of Presumption as now they are, and been so ungovernable.
As for your Burgesses Principles in Religion, which you warrant are so sound, they do not appear so to me. I have some reason to suspect them, you word them so cunningly, in an unusual Phrase, According to the purest Reformed way. He may be what he please, even an Anabaptist or a Quaker, for any thing I see in that Character. Purity of Reformation is the language of them all, and each Faction pretends to be the purest; and where to rank him, I cannot tell.
And for his Principles in Politicks, I have too much ground to question them too, from what you say of him, That he is a stout Opposer of the Court; the King, I doubt, you mean, if not Monarchy. And in that you tell me he is a good Countryman, I must for ever be jealous of him, and of that sort of men, and believe for two Reasons them to be Men of Dangerous and Mischievous Principles, to both Church and State. I consess I have formerly lookt upon them as their Title bespoke them, as a very Loyal true-hearted sort of Gentlemen, that rather meant a great deal of good, than hurt to Church and State; and designed to carry it even betwixt Court and Country, and not to destroy the Prerogative, and to grasp at all Power, nor to Inclose Soveraignty in the Commons House, and make the King himself a Duke of Ve∣nice, and his Antient Court and Counsel insignificant Cyphers. But as things have been lately managed by that sort of Men you call Country-men, I must except against them,
1. Because the worst Principled Men in the whole Nation, are the Men that usurp the Title of Countrymen, and have it bestowed upon them; and the Best and most Faithful Subjects His Majesty hath, and those that have approved themselves always so, are the persons that onely are blackned with that disgraceful Name of Courtiers, which makes me think there is a Snake in the Grass; so that I have no reason to think so well of your Countryman, nor so ill of the Courtiers as you and others do, and would have me. I am inclined to believe there were some Covetous and Ambitious men at Whitehal, in and about Sixty, that sought their own Interest more than the