Animadversions on a treatise intituled Fiat lux, or, A guide in differences of religion, between papist and Protestant, Presbyterian and independent by a Protestant.

About this Item

Title
Animadversions on a treatise intituled Fiat lux, or, A guide in differences of religion, between papist and Protestant, Presbyterian and independent by a Protestant.
Author
Owen, John, 1616-1683.
Publication
London :: Printed by E. Cotes, for Henry Cripps ... and George West ...,
1662.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
J. V. C. -- (John Vincent Canes), d. 1672. -- Fiat lux.
Religious tolerance -- Great Britain.
Cite this Item
"Animadversions on a treatise intituled Fiat lux, or, A guide in differences of religion, between papist and Protestant, Presbyterian and independent by a Protestant." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A53665.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 29, 2024.

Pages

Page [unnumbered]

Page [unnumbered]

To the Reader.

READER,

THe Treatise, intituled Fia Lux, which thou wilt find examined in the ensuing Discourse, was lent unto me, not long since, by an Honorable Per∣son, with a request to return an Answer unto it. It had not been many hours in my hand, before the same desire was seconded by others. Having made no ingagement unto the person of whom I received it, the Book, after some few days, was remnded; yet, as it fell out, not before I had finished my Animadversions upon it. But before I could send my papers to the Press, I heard of a second Edition of that Treatise; which also occasionally coming to my hands, I perceived it had been Printed some good while before I saw or heard of the first. Finding the bulk of the Discourse increased, I thought it needful to go through it once more, to see if any thing of moment were added to that Edition which I had considered, or any alte∣rations

Page [unnumbered]

made by the Authors second thoughts. This somewhat discouraged me, tha, my first Book being gone, I could not compare the Editions, but must trust to my memory, none of the best, as to what 〈◊〉〈◊〉, or was not, in that I had perused. But not designing any use in a mere comparing of the Editions, but only to consider, whether in either of them any thing material was remaining, either not heeded by me, in my hasty passage through the first, or added in the second, un∣discussed; I thought it of no great concern∣ment to enquire again after the first Book. What of that nature offered its self unto me, I cast my thoughts upon, into the Margin of what was before written, inserting it into the same continued Discourse. I therefore desire the Reader, that he may not suspect himself deceived, to take notice▪ that what∣ever quotations out of that Treatise he meets withal, the number of pages throughout, an∣swers the first Edition of it.

Of the Author of that Discourse, and his design therein, I have but little to premise. He seems at first view to be a Napthali, an Hind let loose, and to give goodly words. But though the voice we hear from him some∣times, be the voice of Jacob; yet the hands

Page [unnumbered]

that put forth themselves, in his progress, are the hands of Esau. Moderation is pre∣tended, but his counsels for peace, center in an advice for the extermination of the Ishmael (as he esteems it) of Protestancy. We know full well, that the words he begins to flourish withal, are not Vox ultima Papae. A disco∣very of the inconsistency of his real and pre∣tended design, is one part of our business. In∣deed, an attentive Reader, cannot but quickly discern, that perswasions unto Moderation in different professions of Christian Religion, with a relinguishment of all others to an em∣bracement of Popery, be they never so finely smoothed, must needs interfere. But yet with words, at such real variance among themselves, doth our Author hope to impose his sentiments in Religion, on the minds of noble and ingenious persons, not yet accustomed to those severer thoughts and studies, which are needful to form an exact Judgement in things of this nature. That he should upon any obtain both his ends, Moderation, and Popery, is impossible. No two things are 〈◊〉〈◊〉 inconsistent. Let him cease the pursuit of the latter, and we will follow after the for∣mer with him, or without him. And if any man be so unhappily simple, as to think to

Page [unnumbered]

come to Moderation in Religion-fewds, by turning Romanist, I shall leave him for his conviction to the mistress of such wise men. My present business is, as I find, to separate between his pleas for the Moderation preten∣ded; and those for Popery really, aimed at. What force there may be in his Reasons, for that which he would not have, I shall not ex∣amine, but shall manifest that there is none, in them he uses for what he would. And, Reader, if this hasty attempt for the pre∣vention of the Application of them find ac∣ceptance with thee, I shall, it may be, ere long, give thee a full account of the new Wayes and Principles, which our Author, and the men of the same perswasion, have of late years resolved on, for the promotion of their Cause and Interest.

Farewel.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.