The English historical library, or, A short view and character of most of the writers now extant, either in print or manuscript which may be serviceable to the undertakers of a general history of this kingdom / by William Nicholson ...
About this Item
Title
The English historical library, or, A short view and character of most of the writers now extant, either in print or manuscript which may be serviceable to the undertakers of a general history of this kingdom / by William Nicholson ...
Author
Nicolson, William, 1655-1727.
Publication
London :: Printed for Abel Swall ...,
1696.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Great Britain -- Church history -- Bibliography.
Great Britain -- History -- Bibliography.
Cite this Item
"The English historical library, or, A short view and character of most of the writers now extant, either in print or manuscript which may be serviceable to the undertakers of a general history of this kingdom / by William Nicholson ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A52335.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 6, 2024.
Pages
descriptionPage 106
CHAP. V.
Histories of our Bishops in gene∣ral,
and those of their several
Sees.
THAT Joceline de Fourness (an
Historian quoted by Stow and
Fitzherbert) wrote several Books con∣cerning
the ancient British Bishops,
JohnaPits is very certain: But,
whether he was an English-man, or (as
he rather fancies) a Welch-man, he
dares not be positive. One Book, in∣deed,
of that kind, was written by
Joceline a Monk of Fourness in Lanca∣shire;
and is stillb extant: But (as
the Author himself could not be of any
great Age, so) his Collections seem
to have been made out of Histories
that were penn'd since the Conquest.
Of somewhat less Account (I fear) is
that of the Saxon Prelates, whereof
Ethelwold, Bishop of Winchester, is said
to be the Author; whereof a MS.
descriptionPage 107
Copy is likewisea reported to be in
the publick Library at Cambridge.
After the Conquest, the Memoirs
of our Bishops were taken by a great
many Hands. Geoffrey (Prior of Win∣chester
about the Year 1100.) wrote a
Panegyrical Account of them in ele∣gant
Verse saysbWill. of Malmes∣bury;
who himself more largely com∣mented
upon them in Prose. His four
first Books were publish'd byc Sir
Henry Savil, from a very faulty Manu∣script;
and his Edition was Copy'd
more faultily in that ofdFrancfurt.
In these we have all that could be had
out of the many old Catalogues which
swarm'd in our English Monasteries;
together with what the Author was
able to inform us of his own Know∣ledge,
touching his Cotemporaries.
Henry of Huntingdon'se Letter, to
his Friend Walter, describes the Pre∣lates
of his own Time, which imme∣diately
succeeded to Malmesbury's; and
'tis done with all the heartiness that
becomes a familiar Epistle, and a Free∣dom
inclining to Satyr. Ralph de Di∣ceto
descriptionPage 108
follow'd these with a Catalogue of
his own drawing, from the coming in
of Augustine the Monk, to the begin∣ning
of King John's Reign: But there's
little in it worth the publishing. Joh.
Eversden, a Monk of Bury (who dy'd,
saysaPits, about the Year 1636.)
is said to have written de Episcopis
Anglìae, as well as de Regibus: But
Mr. Wharton could never meet with
any such Treatise. He found, he says,
some of Mr. Joceline's Collections out
of Eversden's Chronicle: So that per∣haps
he's the same Man with that Jo∣hannes
Buriensis, whom we have men∣tion'd
in theb First Part. We are
also told of a like Book by one Nicolas
Montacute, orcManacutius; who
is believed to have been sometime Ma∣ster
of Eaton School, because (for∣sooth)
most of his Works were in the
Library of that College. What good
Things were heretofore in that Li∣brary,
I know not: But, upon ad
late Search, nothing could be found
that bore this Author's Name; save
only a pitiful Treatise (at Lambeth)
de Pontificibus Romanis, not worth the
descriptionPage 109
reading. I fancy somebody's quoting
this under the Title de Pontificibus
(simply) has given occasion to Bale
and Pits, who collected and wrote in
haste, to Naturalize all his Bishops.
Polydore Virgil's Book, ora Scrowl,
of our English Prelates, is boasted of in
our Seminaries beyond Seas: And (his
great Antagonist) John Leland assures
us, he had taken mighty care to collect
their Remains,bEt majori [cura]
propediem in ordinem redigam. He had
many other grand Projects in his Head,
which came to nothing. John Pits
likewise very gravely refers his Readers
(in many parts of his Book de Illustribus
Angliae Scriptoribus) to another of his
own composure de Episcopis: which
we arec credibly inform'd, is only
a poor and silly Abstract of the first
(and worst) Edition of that which falls
next under our Thoughts, and deserves
to be separately consider'd.
Francis Godwine (Son of Tho. Lord
Bishop of Bath and Wells) was most
fortunate in his Commentary, as he
calls it, on this Subject; being himself
descriptionPage 110
advanced to the Episcopal Ordera
for the good Services that (as Queen
Elizabeth thought) he had done the
Church by that Book. It was twice
published inbEnglish; equally full
of the Authors and Printer's Mistakes.
The Faults of the latter Edition (espe∣cially)
were so very gross, that they
put him upon the speedy dispatch of
another in Latine;c which came out
the next Year. The Style of this is
very neat and clean; and he seems to
have taken more Pains in polishing it,
than in gathering together all the Ma∣terials
of his History. He quotes no
Authorities; excepting (belike) that
Posterity should acquiesce in his singly,
without enquiring any further. He is
particularly ungrateful to the Author
of the Antiquitates Britannicae; from
whom he has borrow'd (by the Great)
his Account of the See of Canterbury;
varying only the Phrase, and that
sometimes for the worse. The like
Carriage he is guilty of towards Bale,
Camden, and others: But what is most
especially notorious, is his transcribing
descriptionPage 111
out of Josseline and Mason, what he
pretends to have had immediately from
the Archives and Registraries, from
the Year 1559, to his own Time. He
is also frequently guilty of Chronolo∣gical
Mistakes; a too confident Reli∣ance
on the Authorities of counterfeit
Charters in Ingulfus and others; an
uncertain Calculation of Years, begin∣ning
some at Michaelmas, and others at
Christmas, &c. as his Authors blindly
led him: and lastly, a contenting him∣self
with false and imperfect Cata∣logues
of the Prelates in almost every
Diocess. These are the Failures where
with he stands charg'd bya Mr.
Wharton; who modestly assures us
that a better Progress had been made
in these Matters by himself, within
the compass of Eighteen Months, than
by this Bishop in Twenty Years.
Our Oxford,b Antiquary further
complains, that he Puritanically vilified
Popish Bishops; with a Design there∣by
to advance the Credit of those since
the Reformation: whereby he had
given unlucky Advantages to William
descriptionPage 112
Prynne (the profess'd Enemy of Epis∣copacy)
who made ill use of his Book.
I will not say that either of these Cen∣surers
are mistaken: but I must ob∣serve
to the Reader, that each of them
intended to have furnish'd us with a
View of this part of our Ecclesiastical
History, of his own drawing; and
therefore, like all new Builders, they
must be allow'd to spy more Faults in
the old Fabrick, than others can.
The former has help'd us to a noble
Stock of old Writers upon the Affairs
of a great many of our Sees, from
their Foundation, in his Anglia Sacra:
and the latter has given us almost an
entire History of our Bishops, for the
two last Centuries, in his Athenae Oxo∣nienses.
These are good Materials;
and such as will direct to more of the
same kind; whereof there are good
store in the Bodleian and Cottonian Li∣braries.
We long only for a skilful
Architect, to put them into the Figure
we desire. And (I hear) the Work is
at last put into the Hands of a Per∣son,
who wants none of those Helps
or Qualifications that are necessary to
the Undertaking.
descriptionPage 113
Hitherto we have mention'd only
such as have written the History of
our Prelacy with an honest Intent,
to represent it to the World in its pro∣per
and true Colours: we have others
that have made it their Business to daub
it with false Paint, endeavouring to
give such Pourtraictures of our Bishops,
as might most effectually defame and
prostitute the sacred Order. The first
of these was one Thomas Gibson, a Fa∣natical
Physitian in the beginning of
Queen Elizabeth's Reign; who entitl'd∣one
of his Treatises A History of the
Treasons of the Bishops since the Norman
Conquest. Whether this was ever
Printed mya Author cannot inform
me. The next was Sir John Harring
ton of Kelweston; who, soon after
K. James the First's arrival in Eng∣land,
began to draw together some
malicious Remarks upon the Bishops
of his Time; which he at last finish'd
under the Title ofbA brief view of
the state of the Church of England, as it
stood in Queen Elizabeth's and King
Jame's Reign, to the Year 1608. It
was presented by the Author, in Ma∣nuscript,
descriptionPage 114
to Prince Henry; from whom
the Presbyterian Faction expected great
Alterations in Church-Government.
After the downfal of Episcopacy, it
fell into such Hands as brought it to
the Press; believing it to be a proper
Antidote against the return of the
plaguy Hierarchis. The last of this
Gang was (that eternal Scribler) Will.
Prynne; who rak'd together all the
Dirt that had been thrown at any
of our Bishops, by the most invete∣rate
and implacable of all their Ene∣mies;
and hap'd it into a large
Dunghil-Book inscrib'daThe An∣tipathy
of the English Lordly Prelacy, both
to legal Monarchy and civil Vnity:
Wherein he pretends to give an Hi∣storical
Collection of I know not how
many Hundreds of exercrable Trea∣sons,
Conspiracies, &c. of the British,
English, French, Scotch and Irish Bi∣shops,
against our Kings and King∣dom.
But—'tis time to rid our
Hands of this Filth and Nastiness.
The most ancient Register Books and
Records of our several Dioceses and
descriptionPage 115
Cathedral Churches will less sully our
Fingers.
S. ASAPH. The History of the
Bishops and Deans of this Place was
composed by the late learned and in∣dustrious
Mr. Wharton; whose Book
wasa publish'd soon after his Death;
as a Specimen of what his general
Work (of all the Dioceses in England)
would have been if he had liv'd to
have finish'd it. To this Treatise (as
well as to the other that is prefix'd to
it) there is an Appendix of Authentic
Instruments out of the Register Books,
&c. According to the Method first
taught him by Dr. Burnet. In the
Lives of the Bishops he frequently
quotes the Liber ruber Assavensis, an
old Cartulary of that Church of good
Value.
BANGOR.Godwineb mentions
a Catalogue of the Bishops of this See,
in the Archives of the Church of
Bangor; which I suppose was a very
descriptionPage 116
Empty one, since (upon the two first
Editions of his Book) he had not any
thing to say of this Diocese.
BATH and WELLS. What has
been lately done for this Diocese, is
already taken notice of bya Mr. Tan∣ner;
whose Collections and Refe∣rences
(let it be here observ'd, once
for all) I shall not repeat, but shall
wish the Reader himself to consult
his very useful Book, saving only,
that some of those Authors he barely
quotes (where I am able to do it) shall
be set in the truest Light I can give
them. Let it be here also noted, that
when ever he refers his Readers (as
he does in this place) to one or the
other Volume of Anglia Sacra, they
are there sure to meet with a good
view of such old Writers as have treat∣ed
of the ancient History of this or that
Diocess; or else they have (at least)
a composure of Mr. Wharton's, very
valuable for the Pains that Author
took in adjusting the true Chronolo∣gical
succession of our Bishops. Dr.
Thomas Chandler (sometimeb Warden
descriptionPage 117
of New College in Oxford, and Chan∣cellour
of this Church) wrote a Trea∣tise,
de Laudibus Bathoniae & Welliae;
which, I suppose would afford us some
such Light as the same learn'd Per∣son
has given in those Lives, that have
been gratefully penn'd by him, and
will be taken notice of in another
place. I guess the Historia de tempore
Primaevae inchoationis Sedis Episcopalis
Wellensis, &c. which was made rea∣dy
for the Press by the noble Publi∣shers
a of the Decem Scriptores, is
part of what we have had since from
Mr. Wharton; who also must be
thought to have enrich'd his own Notes
out of theb great Treasure of Col∣lections
which was gather'd and com∣municated
to him by the Reverend
and Learn'd Dr. Matt. Hutton.
BRISTOL. This See, having
only been erected by King Henry the
Eighth, can have no Records of any
great Antiquity: but 'tis hop'd its en∣tire
Story may be had out of such Re∣gisters
as are in the Hands either of
descriptionPage 118
the Bishop or Dean and Chapter of
the Church.
CANTERBVRY, as in Justice
it ought, has had the most and best
learn'd Preservers of its History and
Antiquities of any Diocess in England.
The first of these was Arch-bishop
Deusdedit, or Adeodatus; who isa
said to have recorded the Acts of all his
Predecessors; which was no mighty
Undertaking, since himself was only
the Sixth from Augustine. The eldest
of those Writers, whose Works are
now Extant, is Gotseline the Monk;
who (besides the Life of Augustine,
publish'd by Mr. Wharton) wrote also
those of the Six following Arch-bishops.
These are now in MS. inb Sir Joh.
Cotton's Library: but (being only
Collections out of Bede, with the en∣largement
of a few Romantic Miracles)
they have not hitherto been thought
worth the Printing. About the same
time Osbern was Precentor of Christ-Church;
and (upon thec unhappy
Fire, which destroy'd most of their
descriptionPage 119
Records, A. D. 1070.) took a deal of
Pains in recovering the Histories of the
Arch-bishops; several of whose Lives
were written by him, besides those
we have in Print. Gervasius Dorober∣nensis
(that is, Monk of Canterbury)
has left three good Treatises on this
Subject; which bear the following
Titles;a 1. Tractatus de Combustione
& Reparatione Dorobernensis Ecclesiae.
2. Imaginationes de Discordiis inter Mo∣nachos
Cantuarienses & Archiepiscopum
Baldewinum. 3. Vitae Dorobernen∣sium
Archiepiscoporum. R. de Diceto's
History of these Primates was disco∣ver'd
in the Norfolk Library, after
some others (amongst whom he should
have been rank'd) were publish'd:
And 'twould not have been any great
loss if we had still wanted it; being
b very short, and mostly stuff'd with
Matters foreign to the Purpose. Mr.
Pitsc sends us to the Library at
Bennet College to enquire after a Ma∣nuscript
Copy of Arch-bishop Lang∣ton's
Annals of his Predecessors: But
he that runs on his Errand, will find
himself mistaken. There are, indeed,
descriptionPage 120
in that Library some Collections out
of the last mention'd Author's Histo∣ry
of our Kings, which relate chief∣ly
to the Affairs of this See; the tran∣scriber
whereof had some thoughts of
Copying out St. Langton's History of
Richard the First, and so prefaced his
Work with the Title of Annales Ste∣phani
Archiepiscopi: But he soon quits
that Subject, and so imposes upon a
careless Catalogue-monger. The next,
in Order of time, was Tho. Spott, Spot∣tey
or Sprott, a Benedictine Monk of
Canterbury in the Year 1274.a
whose Book has been vainly enquired
after by some of our most Industrious
Antiquaries, and (particularly) byb
one whom hardly any thing on this
Subject could escape. The Truth is,
Mr. Somner seems to think 'twas ra∣ther
a Chronicle of the City of Canter∣bury
than of the Arch-bishops; and,
if W. Thorn (who was a Monk of
the same House, in the Year 1380.)
either Epitomiz'd orc Enlarged it,
it may probably prove only the same
descriptionPage 121
with his History of thea Abbots of
St. Augustines. St. Birchington's Per∣formance,
is largely accounted for by
his lateb Publisher; who has assur'd
us that nothing that either this Wri∣ter,
or any of the former can afford
us has been omitted by the diligent Au∣thor
of thecAntiquitates Britannicae.
Archbishop Parker was generally reput∣ed
the Author of this admired Book; till
d Mr. Selden transferr'd the Honour
of it to (His Grace's Chaplain) Mr.
Josseline, who has since enjoy'd it. I
confess, I am far from being of AB.
eBramhal's Opinion, That the con∣clusion
of the Preface proves the Acrh∣bishop
himself to have been the Au∣thor
of that Book: But it does fairly
intimate that the Composer of it
(whoever he was) did desire the World
should believe that most of his Mate∣rials
were handed to him by that
Learn'd Metropolitan; who was al∣so,
he saies, the Directer and Overseer
of the whole Work. In the same
descriptionPage 122
place the Hannow Edition is blam'd
for omitting Parker's own Life; which
perhaps was no fault in those that
had the care of it. There were only
a few Copies of the First Edition (such
as were design'd fora public Libraries,
and the accomodation of a few choise
Friends) that had the 29 Pages, which
make up that Life: so that 'twas not
to be expected that the Foreign Pub∣lishers
should Print it otherwise than
as 'twas commonly sold by our Eng∣lish
Booksellers. Mr. Wharton every
where gives this Writer more respect
than any other he's pleased to cite:
and yet heb observes a great many
of his mistakes; and, I do not doubt
but any skilful Antiquarie will easily
take notice of many and many more.
So imperfect will always be the
most compleat Works of any single
Manc!
descriptionPage 123
CARLILE. This remote and
small Diocese has been heretofore so
much expos'd to the continual Incur∣sions
of the Scots, (before the King∣doms
were happily united in King
James the First) that there are not
many of it's ancient Records any
where now to be had: The only
pieces of Antiquity, in the Bishops
possession, are two Register Books of
four successive Prelates; Halton, Rosse,
Kirkby and Welton: and these will
furnish us with little more than the
History of one Century. The Records
of the Dean and Chapter go not much
higher than their new Denomination
given them by Henry the Eighth; and
are very broken and imperfect since
that Epoche. Out of these, and what
other helps could be had from some
Neighbouring and Distant Libraries,
Dr. Hugh Todd (Prebendary of this
Church) has made a Volume of Col∣lections
which is lately placed in the
Dean and Chapter's Library, under
the Title of,aAn History of the Dio∣cese
of Carlile; containing an Account of
descriptionPage 124
the Parishes, Abbies, Nunneries, Chur∣ches,
Monuments, Epitaphs, Coats of
Arms, Founders, Benefactors, &c. with a
perfect Catalogue of the Bishops, Priors,
Deans, Chancellours, Arch-deacons, Preben∣daries;
and of all Rectors and Vicars
of the several Parishes in the said Diocese.
My worthy Brother hopes that the Ad∣ditions
which will hereafter be made
to this Work, will (at last) make it
answer its Title; and I heartily wish I
could do so too: But (to me) the
prospect is so discouraging, that I know
not which way to look for such Helps
as would be necessary for the compleat∣ing
of so full and ample an Account of
our Church and Diocess. Our Suffer∣ings
in the days of Rapine and Re∣bellion,
equal'd or exceeded those of
any other Cathedral of England; and
(after our Chapter-House and Trea∣sury
had been turn'd into a Magazine
for the Garrison, and our very Char∣ter
sold to make a Taylor's Measures)
it can hardly be expected that so many
of our Records will ever be retriev'd
as are requisite to finish out such a Hi∣story.
descriptionPage 125
CHESTER, being another of
King Henry the Eighth's Foundations,
cannot have any great stock of Records.
Some notice may possibly be taken of
its most early Times by Mr. Vrmston;
who wrote ana Account of the State
of Religion in Lancashire (part of this
Diocess) in the beginning of King James
the First's Reign.
CHICHESTER. Most of the
antient Records of this Church, were
squander'd and lost, upon the City's
being taken and plunder'd by Sir Wil∣liam
Waller in our late Civil Wars;
and, after the Restauration, they never
recover'd more than three Books be∣longing
to the Chapter, and a Regi∣ster
or two of the Bishops. These do
not reach above 230 Years backwards:
so that, the prime Antiquities of this
See (before the Episcopal Throne was
removed from Selsey to this Place, and
for some Ages afterwards) are either
wholly lost, or in such private Hands,
as have hitherto very injuriously de∣tain'd
descriptionPage 126
them from their right Owners.
'Till a Restitution is made, we must
content our selves with such poor Frag∣ments
as Bede, Malmesbury and others,
will afford us of the first Foundation
of the Diocess by our Nothern Saint
Wilfrid; who (with his Successors, in
the same Order that Godwine has given
them) stands yet pictur'd on the back∣side
of the Quire. Here are the chief
Remains of their History, as far as
they are now to be had within the
Verge of their own Cathedral: to
which if more shall be added, by such
Foreigners as are Masters of their dis∣persed
Records; 'twill be a very grate∣full
(as well as just) service to the pre∣sent
Members of that Church.
St. DAVID'S. We have already
noted the Disputes there are about Ab∣bot
Dinoth's Remonstrance against the
pretensions of Augustine the Monk;
and we are told that he did not only
leave behind him his thoughts of that
Matter in the foremention'd Protesta∣tion;
but that he also wrote another
Treatise, entitl'd, DefensorinmaJu∣risdictionis
descriptionPage 127
Sedis Menevensis. Bishop
Godwine quotes a Catalogue of the Bi∣shops
of St. David's, not taken notice
of either by Gyraldus or the Annales
Menevenses; which hea says is in
the Archives of that Church. There's
also an Anonymous Manuscript in the
Library atbMagdalen College in Ox∣ford
which treats de Gestis & Ritibus
Cler' Cambrensis; and may probably
afford some discoveries of the ancient
State of this Diocess.
DVRHAM. The first Collecter
of the History and Antiquities of this
Ancient and Noble Church, was Tur∣got;
who wasc Prior, Arch-deacon
and Vicar General, of that Diocess.
He was afterwards Bishop of St. Da∣vid's:
But, upon the death of Queen
Margaret, return'd to Durham; where
he dy'd, A. D. 1115. and lyes bury'd
in the Chapter-House. His Book bears
the Title,dDe Exordio & progressu
Ecclesiae Dunelmensis; that is, from K.
Oswald's Time to the Year 1097. This
descriptionPage 128
was transcrib'd byaSim. Dunelm.
mention'd in the former part of this
Work; who also continu'd it to the
Yearb 1129. from whence it has
been drawn downwards by Jeoffery de
Coldingham, R. de Greystanes, &c. There
are still some latent Manuscript Histories
of this Church; which (if discover'd)
would undoubtedly supply a great
many defects in those that are already
publish'd. Prior Laurence (who dy'd
in the Year 1154.) wrote a Treatise in
Meeter,cDe Civitate & Episcopatu
Dunelmensi. There are several MS.
Tracts of that Author's Composure,
in the Libraries at Lambeth, Durham
and elsewhere; and yet we cannot
hitherto learn where this is to be had.
Tho. Rudburn, in the very heart of his
dHistoria Major, has a large History
of the Bishops of this See, from the
first Foundation at Lindisfarn, to the
Year 1083. which tho' mostly taken
out of Turgot and Simeon, has some re∣markable
passages never yet Printed.
John Wessington (who dy'd Prior of
descriptionPage 129
Durham, A. D. 1446.) wrote a Book,
aDe Juribus & Possessionibus Ecclesiae
Dunelmensis; wherein, amongst other
choice Matters, 'tis prov'd that the
Priors of that Church were always in∣vested
with the Dignity and Privi∣ledges
of Abbots. Sir H. Spelmanb
quotes some Synodical (or rather Con∣sistorial)
Constitutions made by Bi∣shop
Lewis in the Year 1319. which
certainly must be very learn'd ones, if
they answer the AccountcGod∣wine
gives of that Prelate. The Cot∣ton
Library is hardly better stock'd
with the Records of any Cathedral
Church in England, than that of Dur∣ham;
whereof the chief is a larged
Catalogue of their Benefactors, from
King Edwine down to the Reign of
King Henry VIII. The beginning of
the Book is in an old Saxon Character,
as ancient as the time of K. Aethelstane;
in whose Possession 'tis very probable
(from his Name in the Title Page,
supposed to be written with his own
e Hand) it sometime was. There
descriptionPage 130
is also aa Miscellany Collection of
a great many curious Particulars rela∣ting
to St. Cuthbert, and his Successors
in that See; theb Contests of the
Prior and Convent with their own
Bishops and the Archbishops of York,
about the Visitatorial Power; an entire
c History of that Church, from its
Foundation at Lindistarn (through all
its changes of Fortune and Place) as
low as the death of Bishop Hugh,
A. D. 1194. with many otherd re∣markable
Fragments of its History.
There's also in the Bishops Library at
Durham, a MS. Collection of the An∣tiquities
of this Church, transcribed by
the Directions of Bishop Cosin; where∣in
there's a different Account of some
Particulars from what we have in the
Rites and Monuments, published bye
Mr. Davies. Nor is this last mention'd
Piece such an ignorant and pitiful Le∣gend,
as a veryf worthy Person has
represented it; since there's no where
extant so full and exact an Account of
the State of this Cathedral, at the sup∣pression
descriptionPage 131
of Monasteries. The Author
seems to have been an Eye-witness of
all that pass'd at that time; and his
Descriptions of such Matters as are
still remaining, appear to be so nicely
true, that we have great Reason to
credit him in the rest. Besides these,
there are now in the Possession of the
Dean and Chapter, a great many Au∣thentick
Records, Original Charters,
Endowments, &c. which will enable
one to furnish out a much more com∣pleat
History of this Church, than has
yet appear'd: And I hope the Ingeni∣ous
and Learn'd Dr. Iohn Smith, now
Prebendary of that Cathedral, will
think the Undertaking most proper for
himself.
ELY. That History of the Church
of Ely which was partly publish'd by
Sir William Dugdale, and wholly by
Mr. Wharton, is not the Work of Tho∣mas
and Richard, whose Names it car∣ries;
but an Abstract, by a nameless
Author, out of their much larger Vo∣lumes,
which still remain ina Ma∣nuscript.
descriptionPage 132
Some parts of the former
have been printed, out of other Co∣pies,
by L. D' Achery and Dr. Gale; if
those Learn'd Gentlemen be not mi∣staken
(as I suspect they are) in their
Conjectures. Dr. Bradya quotes a
Survey of all the Mannors belonging
to this Bishoprick, taken in the Year,
1248. but does not direct us where to
find it. That S. Birchington (or Brick∣ington,
as he calls him) wrote a Cata∣logue
of the Bishops of Ely,b Mr.
Pits is very positive: But how he fell
into that Mistake (wherein he is fol∣low'd
by Vossius) has been discover'd
by a latec Writer, of much better
Credit. He probably conjectures that,
staging over the Margin of one of
our Learn'd Church-Historians, he
met with this Quotation,dSteph.
Birch. Catal. Episc. Eliens. and thence
presently concluded, that Stephen must
be the Author of the Catalogue there
cited: Whereas the Historian referr'd
his Readers to two several Manu∣scripts
(Birchington's History of the
descriptionPage 133
Archbishops of Canterbury, and an ano∣••ymous
Catalogue of the Bishops of
Ely) for the proof of what he had
there advanced.
EXETER. There is in Bodley's
Library an old Latin Mass-Book in
Saxon Characters; in the end whereof
we have many Particulars of the Life
of Bishop Leofric (who gave the Book
to his Cathedral) as his settling the
Episcopal See at Exeter, A. D. 1050.
&c. It gives us also a Catalogue of
the Reliques that Church was possess'd
of at the time when this Book was
written. John Grandeson (who dy'd
Bishop of this See, A. D. 1369.) is
a said to have written Martyrologium
Exoniense: for a Manuscript whereof
we are advised to consult the Library
at Bennet College. John Hooker (or
Vowel, Chamberlain of Exeter, where
he dy'd, A. D. 1601.) wrote a lean
Catalogue of the Bishops of that See;
first publish'd by him in Quarto, and
afterwards inserted intobRalph
Holinshead's Chronicle. It begins with
Eadulph, whom he unaccountably calls
descriptionPage 134
Werstant, and ends at Bishop Woolton;
who was consecrated in the Year, 1579.
There's no want of Materials for the
composure of a much fuller History:
Since the Registers of a good many of
the Bishops (Stapleton, Brantingham,
Stafford, &c.) are cited bya Mr. Whar∣ton;
and many more pointed at by
Mr. Ta••••er.
GLOCESTER, being a Diocess
of Henry VIIIth's Erection, cannot have
any Records, relating to the See it self,
more authentick than that which ac∣quaints
us with theb Erection of
St. Peter's Church into a Cathedral:
But there are many Venerable Re∣mains
of Ecclesiastical History, which
are to be had in the Register-books of
those Religious Houses and Parochial
Churches which were then brought
within that Jurisdiction. Out of these
Dr. R. Parsons (the present worthy
Chancellor of that Diocess) has colle∣cted
two MS. Volumes; which are
also digested into so good a Method,
that they well deserve the Title of a
descriptionPage 135
Compleat History. The first of these
he stiles Memoirs of the ancient Abbey
and present Cathedral of Gloucester:
wherein he gives an Account of the
Foundation of the Great Abbey of
St. Peter's in this City, and the Suc∣cession
of its Abbots, down to the Dis∣solution;
with the History and Suc∣cession
of the Bishops, Deans, Chan∣cellors,
Archdeacons and Prebendaries,
ever since the dismembering of it from
the See of Worcester. This Work was
happily undertaken at the Request of
the late Mr. Wharton; who design'd
to have oblig'd the Publick with it,
in some future Volume of his Anglia
Sacra. We are not in despair of see∣ing
the good Services that were in∣tended
our Church by that Learn'd
Person, fully finish'd and brought to
Perfection by some other able Hand:
So that, 'tis to be hop'd, we shall not
long want the Benefit of such successful
Labours. His other Volume bears the
Inscription of A Parochial Visitation of
the Diocess of Gloucester; wherein the
Matters treated on are chiefly Ecclesi∣astical,
tho' some Affairs of a Civil
Nature are also intermix'd. The Ob∣servations
that occur in this are partly
descriptionPage 136
owing to the Author's own View and
Enquiries, made in the several Pa∣rishes;
and partly to such Helps as
could be had out of the Registry at
Worcester, and his own at Glou∣cester.
HEREFORD. That there were
anciently several good old Register-books
belonging to this Cathedral, is
beyond dispute. Sir H. Spelmana
quotes one of 'em; and we have heard
of several others, besides that of Bishop
bBooth. The Library and Ar∣chives
here fell under the like Misfor∣tunes,
during the Ravage of our late
Days of Usurpation, with those of
other Cathedral Churches: being made
a very improper Prey to a Fanatical
and Illiterate Army of Rebellious
Blockheads. Amongst these Silas Tay∣lor
was an Officer of a more than or∣dinary
Fancy and Respect for Books
and Learning; and, having gotten
part of thec Bishop's Palace into
his Possession, thought it was also
convenient to seize as many of the
descriptionPage 137
Churches Evidences and Records, as
he could possibly get into his Clutches.
With these (and many of the like kind
from the Church at Worcester) he
troop'd off, upon the happy return of
our old English Government; and near
Twenty Years afterwards, dy'd
with some of 'em in his Possession at
Harwich. His Books and Papers, to∣gether
with the other few Moveables
he left behind him, fell into the Hands
of his Creditors; from whom (if any
care was taken to preserve them) it
will now be a very difficult Matter to
retrieve them.
LANDAFF.Bishop Godwinea assures us, that all he says of the
Archbishops and Bishops of this See,
down as far as the Year 1110. was
taken out of an old Manuscript-Regi∣ster
of that Church; which seem'd to
him to have been penn'd about that
Time. This, he tells us, was most
particular in the Account of the Acts
and Miracles of St. Teliau, the second
Bishop of that Diocess; and therefore
I take it to be the very same with that
descriptionPage 138
which is, now in Sir John Cotton's Li∣brary,
and (for that very Reason)
bears there the Title ofaTeilo.
From 〈◊〉〈◊〉b Sir Henry Spelman
had the whole Account he gives us of
the several Synodical Decrees of divers
Bishops in that Church: As Mr.
Wharton had also those good Pieces
which he afterwardsc publish'd, as
being overlook'd both by Godwine and
Spelman. There's yet another Book,
in the samed Library, that affords a
History or Chronicle of this Church;
which seems to have escap'd the notice
of both these diligent Antiquaries. It
commences at Brute, and ends A. D.
1370.
LINCOLN. There's a meagre
Catalogue of the Bishops of this Dio∣cess
in the Cottoniane Library;
which brings down the Succession of
them from Birinus to John Longland,
who was Consecrated, A. D. 1521.
'Tis much the List of these Prelates
should be so compleat; when our
descriptionPage 139
a Historians are at a loss for the very
Place where a good many of them
〈◊〉〈◊〉 Some Letters (from Pope Mar∣tin
and his Cardinals) about the
Struggle that happen'd upon the Ad∣vancement
of Rich. Fleming to this See,
may beb had; but in the main, we
are very deficient in all the parts of
its History, and shall hardly recover
any great Matters more than its own
Registries will supply us with. What
those are I know not.
LITCHFIELD. In the peru∣sal
of the History of this Diocess, one
great mistake (which has been una∣nimously
swallow'd by all ourc
Church-Historians) is to be observ'd
to our Reader: And that is, we are
told that (upon the subdivision of the
Kingdom of Mercia into three Dio∣ceses,
about the Year 740.) there was
a Bishop placed at Leicester. We do
indeed meet with onedTotta, who
is said to have been Episcopus Legece∣striae,
about that Time: But Leger∣cestria
descriptionPage 140
is the old name of Leicester, as
Legecestria is of Chester. It was there∣fore
(in Truth) at West-Chester that
the New Diocess was erected, and not
at Leicester; which is too near to Litch∣field,
were there no other Argument
against it. With these Cautions we
are to peruse the two valuable MSS.
ina Sir John Cotton's Library; which
have (in a great measure) been Printed
in the Anglia Sacra and are very pro∣bably
b ascrib'd to Tho. Chesterton and
Will. Whitlock, two Canons of this
Church. Of the former of these there
are several ancient Copies; and 'tis
that venerable Book which is quoted
by many of our late Writers under
the Name of Chronicon Lichfeldense.
These are the chief Registers of the
old Records of the Church of Lich∣field,
that are now Extant: Unless per∣haps
their Cartulary orcBlack-Book,
and thed Description of their Close
(or College) be still to be met with.
The little that was to be sav'd out of
the Ruins, into which this Cathedral
descriptionPage 141
fell in our late Days of Confusion, was
pick'd up by (one of the great Preser∣vers
of our English Antiquities) Elias
Ashmole Esq late Garter King at Arms;
and is now, amongst many other of
his precious Remains, in hisaMu∣saeum
at Oxford. This excellent Per∣son
had a Design to have honour'd
the Place of his Nativity, with the
writing a History and Description of
its ancient and present State; and had
collected a good number of choice Ma∣terials
for that Purpose.
LONDON. I do not much la∣ment
BishopbGodwine's Misfortune,
that his best diligence could not re∣cover
a right Catalogue of the British
Arc-bishops of this City. Whatever
became of Theanus and Theonus (the
Alpha and Omega of those Sixteen Me∣tropolitans)
I should be mightily pleas∣ed
to hear that its History is entire
since Mellitus's time; or even that we
had every thing mention'd in that
List of Records, Registers and other
Books belonging to this Cathedral,
descriptionPage 142
which wasa deliver'd by Dean Cole
to his Successor Dr. May, in the Year
1559. What or where the Annales
Londinenses are, Mr. Wharton (who
b quotes them) does not tell us:
nor whether they treat only of the
Affairs of this Diocess, or (what I ra∣ther
Suspect) present us with such a
short History and Chronicle of the
Kingdom in general, as almost every
one of our Monasteries afforded. 'Tis
enough that he has left behind him
an elaboratec History of the Bishops
and Deans of this See, of his own
composure; wherein (following the
Method to which he had confin'd
himself in his two larger Volumes)
he brings their Story down to the
Year 1540. To this Treatise (as well
as that of St. Asaph, which is joyn'd
with it) is annex'd an Appendix of
Authentic Instruments; and he has
further let us know that (of the Pre∣lates
before the Reformation) we have
the Registers of Gravesend, Sudbury,
Courtney, Braybrook, Walden, Clifford,
Gilbert, Kemp, Grey, Savage, Warham,
descriptionPage 143
Barnes, Fitz-James, Tonstal, Stokesley
and Bonner. The Sepulchral Monu∣mnts
of St. Paul's Church were first
drawn out and publish'd by (Mr. Cam∣den's
grateful Scholar)aHugh Holland
the Poet: But this was only a mean
and dull Performance in comparison of
that more absolute one of Sir Will.
Dugdale, in hisb History of that
Cathedral from its first Foundation;
extracted out of Lieger Books and
other Manuscripts, and beautified
with sundry Prospects of the Church,
and the Figures of the Tombs. The
greatest part of the Cartularies and
Records, refer'd to in this Book,
were happily communicated to the
Author by onec Mr. Reading; who
thereby encouraged his Zealous En∣gaging
in the Work, at a very pro∣per
and seasonable Juncture. For,
soon after he had taken Copies of the
Inscriptions, a great many of the Mo∣numents
were defaced, and the Church
it self turn'd into a common Stable
by the Rebel Army; as it was (with∣in
ten Years after that) into a heap
descriptionPage 144
of Rubbish by the dreadful Fire of
London.
NORWICH. There are not ma∣ny
Histories of this Diocess. All that
Mr. Whartona could pick up was
out of a couple of General Histories
of England, written by Bartholomew
de Cotton, and another (anonymous)
Monk of that Church. He quotes in∣deed
a short Chronicle of Norwich in
the same Library, whence he had
the former of these; But the late Pub∣lisher
of the Catalogue of those Manu∣scripts
is mistaken if there be any
such Book, in theb Place referr'd
to. There is indeed, inc another
Class, a piece which bears the Title
of Festa synodalia Norwicensis Dioeceseos;
which begins with St. Foelix the Bur∣gundian,
their first Bishop. The old∣est
Register-Book which I have yet
heard of in this See, is that of Bishop
dBateman; the Magnanimous Foun∣der
of Trinity Hall in Cambridge. A
short Account of the Bishops and
Deans of this Church (by Tho. Searle,
descriptionPage 145
A. D. 1659.) is among the MSS. of
the present worthy Bishop of the
Diocess.
OXFORD is of so late an Ere∣ction,
that it cannot want an absolute
and entire History of all its Prelates,
since its Foundation by Henry the
Eighth: And we havea already
observ'd, that its Parochial Antiquities
(preceeding that Time) are happily
preserv'd by an Ingenious and Learn'd
Person, who has spar'd no Pains in
Collecting (out of a vast number of
Neighbouring Records and Evidences)
whatever was worth the Treasuring
up, and transmitting to Posterity.
Anth. Wood Collected the Sepulchral
and Fenestral Inscriptions of the seve∣ral
Parishes in the County of Oxford;
which are now amongst those many
Papers he left to the University.
PETERBVRGH, was one of
the most Rich and Flourishing Mona∣steries
in this Kingdom; and was
turn'd into one of the poorest Bishop∣ricks
by Henry the Eighth. The most
descriptionPage 146
of those many excellent Histories that
concern this Place, in its Pristine State,
have been noted bya Mr. Tanner;
tho' some few have escap'd his great
Diligence. He has taken no notice of
two old Registers, given by my Lord
Hatton to thebCottonian Library;
nor of some ancientc Grants and Do∣nations
to that Monastery. He has al∣so
omitted Hugh White, Abbot of Pe∣terburgh:
who in Leland's Character
is,dRerum Petroburgi gestarum lu∣culentus
plane Scriptor. To these there's
little to be added, since the Founda∣tion
of the Episcopal See, of any great
value; saving what has been carefully
preserv'd ine St. Gunton's History,
which will be this Churchesfever∣lasting
Monument. Some Inscriptions
are said, indeed, to have been defaced
before the Survey taken by this Au∣thor:
but those, weg are told were
also to be had amongst the Manu∣scripts
of Franc. Thynne, who Collect∣ed
them in the Year 1592. 'Twas
happy that Sir William Dugdale and
descriptionPage 147
Mr. Gunton drew up their Collections
at so seasonable and lucky a time as
the Year 1641. For (within two
years after that) in April, 1643. this
Cathedral was most miserably abused
by Cromwell's Regiment; who, among
other shameless outrages,abroke in∣to
the Chapter-House, ransack'd the Re∣cords,
broke the Seals, tore the Writings,
and left the floor cover'd over with torn
Papers, Parchments and Seals.
ROCHESTER. The most ve∣nerable
Monument of Antiquity that
belongs to this Church, is the Textus
Roffensis; which may justly challenge
a Respect more than ordinary. It was
written by Bishop Ernulf, who dy'd
in the Year 1124. And (besides the
Affairs of this Cathedral, which are ac∣counted
for byb Mr. Wharton) furni∣shes
us with the Laws of four Kentish
Kings, (Ethelbert, Hlothere, Eadred and
Withred) omitted by Lambard; together
with the Saxon Form of Oaths of Fealty
and Wager of Law; the old Form of
c cursing by Bell, Book and Candle; of
descriptionPage 148
a Ordale, &c. I suppose this Book
was wisely committed to the care of
Sir Roger Twisden, during the confu∣sions
of our late Civil Wars: For in
his Custody I find it often referr'd to
by Sir William Dugdale, in ab Work
which he Compos'd during those
Troubles. Hadenham and Dene's Histo∣ries
have been pickt, and their choicest
Flowers are preserv'd in the Anglia Sacra:
And thecChronicon Claustri Roffensis
is the same with the Textus.
SALISBVRY. Somewhat of
the History of the ancient Bishops of
Sherburn may be had among L. Noel's
d Collections; and the defects of
those (down to the Year 1357.) may
be supply'd from the Chronicle of the
Church of Sarum. This Chronicle be∣gins
at the Creation; and has some
e special Remarks touching the Af∣fairs
of our ancient British Church,
wherein it seems to be singular. The
Registers also of several of their Bi∣shops
descriptionPage 149
(asaMortival, Wivil, Wal∣tham,
Medford, Aiscough and Beau∣champ)
are still extant.
WINCHESTER. There can
hardly be any more said of this An∣cient
and Famous See than what we
have frombTho. Rudburn and other
Authors, lately publish'd out of Sir
John Cotton's inexhaustible Treasury:
Unless, for the more modern Times,
we had that Continuation of the
Bishops, which was made bycJohn
Trussel; who brought their History
as low as the Sufferings of Bishop Curl
(and his Order) in the beginning of
our English Anarchy.
WORCESTER. As this Church
was one of the most flourishing in the
whole Island, under the Government
of our Saxon Kings; so it had the
fortune to preserve its Charters and
other Instruments (relating to those
Times) much better than its Neigh∣bours.
In the Year 1643. Sir William
Dugdale drew a Catalogue of no less
descriptionPage 150
than 92 such original Donations, none
whereof fell lower than the Reign of
Henry the First. To these there have
been fifteen more (now in the Archives
of that Church, and not mentioned in
the Monasticon) added bya Dr. Hickes;
who also believes that among Mr. Lam∣bard's
MSS. (now in the Archives at
Canterbury) there are several Saxon
Grants belonging to the Church of
Worcester. After these we are to have
recourse to the Anonymous Compilers
of the Annals of this Cathedral, and
the continuation of them by their
learn'd Publisher; who (by the way)
b tells us thatcHemming's Book
has much more in it, than either he
or Sir W. Dugdale have given them∣selves
the trouble of transcribing. John
Rosse (the Renown'd Hermit of Guy's
Cliff) is said to have written a Trea∣tise,
de Episcopis Wigorniae; which I
should not much have believed upon
the single Credit of my firstd Au∣thor,
had I not seen the Book it self
quoted by (our late industrious Natu∣ralist)
descriptionPage 151
DoctoraPlott. Some part of
Mr. Abingdon's Collection of the An∣tiquities
of Worcestershire (mention'd
in the former part of this Historical
Library) is also reported to bear the
Title of,bA History of the Bishops
of Worcester: which I cannot but once
more heartily wish were committed
to the Inspection and Care of the
Learn'd Dr. Hopkins, Prebendary of
that Church; who (wec know) is
throughly versed in the Antiquities of
his own Cathedral, as well as in those
of the English Church in General. I
am well assured there are some failures
in it, which he is abundantly able to
Correct. 'Twould do a deal of right
to the worthy Author's Memory, to
have the Style (which in most Anti∣quaries,
is usually a little too Austere)
new polish'd; and to have some de∣fects
supply'd, out of such Libraries
and Ancient Monuments as did not
fall in his way.
YORK. The first Historian of the
Affairs of this Metropolitical See, was
descriptionPage 152
Albinus, Alcuinus or Alcwinus; whose
Poem (de Pontificibus & Sanctis Ecclesiae
Eboracensis) was first discover'd by
Mr. Mabillon, and publish'd bya
Dr. Gale. He begins his Story with
such an Account of the Ancient State
of that City, and the first appearances
of Christianity among the Northern
Saxons, as Bede furnish'd him with;
and concludes with the Death of (his
Patron) AB. Eanbald the first. The
next (if indeed he deserve the Name)
was Simeon Dunelmensis; whose Epi∣stle
(to Hugh Dean of York, about the
Succession of these Arch-bishops, to
the Year 1136.) is in several of ourb
Libraries. After these came T. Stubbs
(or Stobaeus, as some are pleas'd to
write his Name) a Dominican Friar,
and Dr. in Divinity about the Year
1373. whose Chronica Pontificum are
publish'd amongst our Decem Scriptores.
He is highly magnified by Gesner, Bale
and Vossius; and he deserves some part
of the Applause: But he had merited
much more, if he had copy'd (or
stoln) less from Richard of Hexham.
descriptionPage 153
Arch-bishop Vshera quotes a MS.
History of our York Primates written
about the Year 1460. which I cannot
observe to be the same with any of
those in thebCottonian Library.
However, here we have a largec
Register of all the Affairs of St. Pe∣ter's
in York; from the Reign of King
Henry the First, to that of Edward the
First: to which is annex'd a Catalogue
of the Prebendaries of that Church,
and their several Corpses. Here is
likewise another remarkabled Regi∣ster
of the Acts of the Chapter, du∣ring
the vacancy of both the Arch-bi∣shoprick
and Deanery; Commencing
the 6th of January, A. D. 1396. To
which is subjoyn'd a Third (of the
Dean and Chapter, as Guardians of
the Spiritualties) upon the Death of
Arch-bishop Rotheram, A. D. 1500.
In other hands we have the Registers
ofeGreenfeld, Melton, Thoresby, Scroop,fBowet, Rotheram, and some other
Arch-bishops; as also thegDoomesday
descriptionPage 154
and White-Book of St. Peter's, with
many more Records, in the possession
of the present Arch-bishop, or his
Chancellour, and the Dean and Chap∣ter.
Out of all (or most) of these very
Voluminous Collections have been late∣ly
taken bya Dr. Matthew Hutton (de∣scended
from an Arch-bishop of this
Province, of both his Names) and Mr.
Torr, a great Favourer of these Stu∣dies;
by whose Beneficial Labours, we
hope, the History and Antiquities of
this Church will effectually be pre∣serv'd:
But whoever he be that at∣tempts
the whole History of the Dio∣cess,
ought to know, that he may have
store of choice Materials amongst Mr.
Dodsworth's Manuscripts at Oxford.
Historia de Episcopis et Decanis Londinensibus; necnon de Episcopis et Decanis Assavensibus, a prima utriusq sedis Fundatione ad. An. 1540. 8vo. Lond. 1695.
For the Controversy betwixt the Chap∣ter of Canterbury and the Arch-deacon, about the Right of Jurisdiction Sede Vacante, see Bibl. Cott. Nero, c. 9. Galba, E. 4. Vitellius, A. 2. 8. D. 7. E. 4.