XIV. THESIS.
That Protestant Divines of other Reform'd Churches, have held it most equall to be directed by the judgements of Anci∣ents for proof of a practice Apostolical.
WE plead no other equity in this cause,a then what Cal∣vin held necessary against Anabaptisticall Revelati∣ons, arguing negatively in this manner, These lyes (saith he) are easily confuted, because many were then living who had been conversant with the Disciples of the Apostles. So he concerning Doctrines. How much more convincent must this Argument be when our Question shall be of the practice of the Church in the dayes of the Apostles? even as is daily done by all Christian Churches, for p••oof of the practice of baptizing of Infants, against the same Anabaptisticall Faction; yea, why not also for the like Originall practice of Episcopacy, even by the confession of Protestant Divines of excellent judgement: b Beza must not be neglected, telling us, that he ought not to neglect the Ordinance of a higher degree of a Bishop above a Presbyter, because this was an ancient custome in the famous Church of Alexandria. So he. This is well, but he hath not quite told out his tale, which he doth elsewhere out of the words ofc Hierome, saying namely, that in Alexandria, from Mark the Evangelist, one was elected by the Presbytery,