CHAP. XVII.
1. That this Opposition against the Divine Grace of Charity is a most substantial Limb of Antichristianism, and the Character of them without the Holy City. 2. That that repeated Catalogue of abhorred Titles in the Apocalyps is plainly a Synopsis of the main Characters of the Antichristian Polity we describe. 3. The confirmation of the truth of our Idea of Antichristianism therefrom. 4. A summary Re∣presentation of this Idea in the Oppositions and Defeatments of the Privative Ends of the Gospel, as also of those noted Offices of Christ. 5. Of his Divinity and other holy Titles. 6. Of the Divine Life in Root and Branches. 7. A Parable to set out the salvage Injustice and Cruelty of this Antichristian Synagogue. 8. The Apodosis of the Parable. 9. That we have set out the Idea of the most real and essen∣tial Antichristianism that can be; with an Answer to what may be ob∣jected to the contrary. 10. That it is that very Antichristianism that is foretold in the Prophets, the clearing whereof necessitates us to an inspection into them before we make any punctual Application of our Idea to the Apostasy of the Church.
1. THat this last Limb therefore of our Description, comprised in such things as are notoriously opposite to that Heavenly Vertue of Charity, is a very substantial Limb of Antichristianism, I think it is im∣possible for any one to doubt: And therefore it is no wonder that the chief Character thereof which is writ in letters of bloud, I mean that of Bloudy persecution, which I last of all insisted upon, is entred into that black list of Names which are excluded out of the Holy City of God; Without are Dogs, and Sorcerers, and Fornicatours, and Murtherers, and Idolaters, and every one that loves and makes a lie. Which I doubt not but is a Synopsis of the chief Oppositions to the Holy City, or Body of Christ; and therefore what can this other Body be but the very Body of Antichrist?
2. And I look upon that brief comprehension of those detestable Titles as the more considerable and more exactly computed, because the same summe, though not the same words, seems to be reckoned up in two several places; for where the words differ, yet reckoning one thing with another, we shall find the same extent of sense taken in. For 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are of equal extent with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.
For, as I had occasion to note above, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will answer to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, such persons being understood in both as are seducible by false Doctrines and feigned Legends contrary to both the Word of