put for both, doth prove that they are necessary and fundamental Parts of it. Withal, how appears it, that one of them alone is oft put for both? All the Proof that he tenders for it is in the Words imme∣diately following: For (says he) St. Mark, chap. 6. 12. mentions nothing but their preaching Repentance, as St. Luke in the parallel Place, chap. 9. 6. men∣tions nothing but their evangelizing or preaching the good News of the Kingdom of the Messiah. Thus Mr. Lock. But how will he hence make good this Inference, Therefore, of these two, Believing and Repenting, one alone is oft put for both? There is no mention of believing in either Place: St. Luke says, that the Apostles preach'd the Gospel; St. Mark says, that they preach'd, that Men should repent; of believing here is not a Word. But from both Texts we may gather that this, That Jesus is the Messiah, was not the only Article which the Apostles preach'd: For in St. Mark 6. 12. they preach'd, that Men should repent, or that they should have their Sins remitted upon their Repentance, as St. Pe∣ter afterward preach'd, Repent, and be baptiz'd for the Remission of Sins, Acts 2. 38. and, as our Savi∣our says, St. Luke 24. 47. that Repentance and Re∣mission of Sins should be preach'd; so that it is clear, that the Apostles preach'd this Article of Remission of Sins upon our repenting. And then, in St. Luke 9. 6. they preach'd the Gospel, which comprehends more than that one Article, That Jesus is the Mes∣siah, as the good News, that a Saviour was born in∣to the World, &c.
Mr. Lock, in Reasonab. of Christianity, p. 201. having said, that sometimes turning about is put alone to signifie Repentance, cites St. Matth. 13. 15. and St. Luke 22. 32. where the Word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, and why that should be rendred to turn about, rather than to convert or turn, I am to be taught.