A treatise of the nature of a minister in all its offices to which is annexed an answer to Doctor Forbes concerning the necessity of bishops to ordain, which is an answer to a question, proposed in these late unhappy times, to the author, What is a minister?

About this Item

Title
A treatise of the nature of a minister in all its offices to which is annexed an answer to Doctor Forbes concerning the necessity of bishops to ordain, which is an answer to a question, proposed in these late unhappy times, to the author, What is a minister?
Author
Lucy, William, 1594-1677.
Publication
London :: Printed by Thomas Ratcliffe for the author, and are to be sold by Edward Man ...,
1670.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Hooker, Thomas, 1586-1647. -- Survey of the summe of church-discipline.
Forbes, John, 1593-1648. -- Irenicum.
Church of England -- Clergy.
Clergy -- Office.
Cite this Item
"A treatise of the nature of a minister in all its offices to which is annexed an answer to Doctor Forbes concerning the necessity of bishops to ordain, which is an answer to a question, proposed in these late unhappy times, to the author, What is a minister?." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A49441.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 3, 2024.

Pages

Page [unnumbered]

To the Reader.

Reader,

THere are some things which I thought fit to acquaint you with; first, with my self who am here stiled a Bishop, and so may be mistrusted to speak, as a man bi∣assed in the cause, writing for my self, and our Order; but although I am one, yet when this was writ, I was none: but a Presbyter only, and never thought to be a Bishop, or to see one in England, nor could; unless I could have foreseen such a miraculous deliverance, as it pleased God to give the King; for which his Name ought always to be magnified; so that the writer, should not prejudice the Cause, being then impartial.

The next thing is concerning my medling with Mr. Thomas Hooker of New England in this controversy, which I cannot call to mind by what reason: But this I remember, that there was a Clergy-man of mine acquaintance, who warping that way, highly commended that Author, and had some Conference with

Page [unnumbered]

me about his Book, and it was much honour∣ed by a friend of mine in London, who oc∣casioned my buying of it, an ingenious man he was, with a very Logical and Methodical Head; but so overcome with his own opinions; that even opposite expressions appear to him, as if they were for him, as will appear in per∣using the Treatise.

My way of writing was to follow my bu∣sinesses, as they lay before me; not consining my self to any others Method, who had treated of such things; Many times you may find me writing the same things, which twenty be∣fore me have done, Aliter non sit Avitaliber it must needs be so; but sometimes again you may be rewarded with such notions, as are not ordinary; without which, a Book is but repetition, but in all you shall find mine own manner of expressions, which may possibly meet with some, understanding more agreeing∣ly, than others have done; and so may be profitable to the quieting of different judg∣ments, the greatest and most Noble work of any mans industry; and if I have done it, but in part, I am atisfied and God should be glori∣fied, which is all the endeavour of your Bro∣ther in Christ Jesus.

WILLIAM St. DAVID'S.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.