An abridgment of Mr. Locke's Essay concerning humane [sic] understanding

About this Item

Title
An abridgment of Mr. Locke's Essay concerning humane [sic] understanding
Author
Locke, John, 1632-1704.
Publication
London :: Printed for A. and J. Churchill ..., and Edw. Castle ...,
1696.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Knowledge, Theory of.
Cite this Item
"An abridgment of Mr. Locke's Essay concerning humane [sic] understanding." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A48871.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.

Pages

Page 84

CHAP. XXV. Of Relation.

THere is another Sett of Ideas which the Mind gets from the comparing of one thing with another. When the Mind so considers one thing, that it does as it were bring it to, and set it by another, and carry its view from one to the other, this is Relation or Respect: and the deno∣minations given to things intimating that Respect, are what we call Relatives. And the things so brought together Re∣lated. Thus when I call Cajus, Husband, or Whiter, I intimate some other Person, or Thing in both cases, with which I compare him. Any of our Ideas may be the foundation of Relation.

Where Languages have failed to give correlative Names, there the Relation is not so easily taken notice of: As in Con∣cubine, which is a Relative name, as well as Wife.

The Ideas of Relation may be the same, in those Men who have far different Ideas

Page 85

of the things that are Related. Thus those who have different Ideas, of Man, may agree in that of a Father.

There is no Idea of any kind, which is not capable of an almost infinite num∣ber of Considerations, in reference to other things: and therefore this makes no small part of Men's Words, and Thoughts. Thus one single Man, may at once sustain the Relations of Father, Brother, Son, Husband, Friend, Subject, Gene∣ral, European, Englishman, Islander, Master, Servant, Bigger, Less, &c. to an almost infi∣nite number; he being capable of as ma∣ny Relations, as there can be occasions of comparing him to other things in any manner of Agreement, Disagreement, or Respect whatsoever.

The Ideas of Relations are much clear∣er and more distinct, than of the Things related; because the Knowledge of one Simple Idea, is oftentimes sufficient to give me the notion of a Relation: but to the knowing of any substantial Being, an accurate collection of sundry Ideas is necessary.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.