Page 77
I did not think of explaning my sense of the use of the Caecum until I had had the Leisure and opportunty of purposely examining the I••testines of most kind of Animals. But because I am much mistaken by the person, who, as you tell me, is desirous to be anonimous to me, him I mean who raised the scruples you sent me, upon the Second Paragraph, which says, the use of the Intestinum Caecum to be subservient to that of the Colon, and Rectum; manifest in such Animals where Nature in∣tends a certain, and determinate Figure to the Excrements. I shall be forced to tell you, what I presume may prove, as neer the truth, as any one of the many con∣jectures extant in Authors, about the unknown use of this part. I understand by determinate figure. First, the Excrements divided into many small parts of a like shape, such as Sheep, Deer, Conies, Rats, Mice, Horses Catterpillers, Some Snailes &c. doe void. Secondly, in a greater Latitude, I oppose figured Excrements to Liquid, as C. Celsus in some place doth; Thus the dung of Pigeons, and Geese, of Men, Dogs, Cats, &c. may be said to be figured. Now the Caecum, in my opinion, is subservient in some measure to the figuration of both, but most manifestly in the first kind. My meaning is that pro∣bably the use of the Caecum is to keep the Excrements, that passe into its cavitie (and I believe all, or most part of them do in sound Animals) so long, until they are sufficiently drained, baked, hardned, or of a due consi∣stence, (as clay is temperd for the mould) to receive the Figure to be given from the Colon and rectum. This use I say of the Caecum, seems to me to be much more manifest in such Animals, as have figured Excrements of the first kind. In Ratts for example, (whose Excre∣ments