THe Character of a Popish Successor were an excellent Piece in the kinde, if it had not too much Sublimate in it; For I have heard of some people, that, with only holding their Noses over it, but one quarter of an hour, have run stark mad upon't: And when This Fume has once taken the Brain, there's nothing in the world, but the Powder of Experience, (the Remembrance of things past) to set a man Right again. The Truth of it is, the Au∣thour has made the Figure of his Successour too Frightful, and enor∣mous; Sawcer-ey'd and Cloven ••ooted; and when he has painted the Monster as black on the One side, as Ink and Words can make him; he finishes his Master-Piece with a Paradox, on the Other; (Fol. 4.) by the Supposal of a most Excellent Person, and yet ma∣king him the greater Devil for his Virtues.
His Fortitude (he says) makes him only the more Daring in the Cause of Rome; his Justice makes it a Point of Conscience to deliver us up to the Pope; his Temperance, in the Government of his Passions, makes him the more close and steady; and his Prudence crowns the Work, by the assistance it gives him in the Menage of his Policies and Conduct: And so he goes on. Wbat booss it (says he) in a Popish Heir, to say, he's the Truest Friend, the Greatest of Hero, s, the best of Masters, the Justest Judge, or the Honestest of Men? All meer treacherous Quicksands for a people to repose the least glimpse of Safety in, or build the least hopes upon.
This is fairly push'd, I must confess, but 'tis only a cast of his Rhetorique: For every body knows, that all Christian Princes thus Qualify'd, and under Articles of Treaty and Agreement, keep touch, even with Infidels; nay, and Infidels with Christians.
Before I go any further, let me recommend to the Reader, one Remarque, as a thing worthy of his Attention: He cuts all the way upon the Successor, as presupposing him to be a Papist, and conse∣quently `Dangerous, and Insufferable, by reason of That Perswasion. And very magisterialy he gives us his own bare word for the dangers of that Perswasion. Why does he not rather tell us in express and particular Terms, These and These are the Principles of the Church of Rome? and then make his Inference, from those Principles to