Division or Dichotomie, because the Channel through which I am to pass is so narrow and so dangerously beset with Rocks and shelves on the right hand and on the left; as there is no possibility for two to go on brest, nor any room for Steerage, but only Towage. One passage in my Disquisition must draw another after it, by one and the same direct Line.
For first, if I should chance to say any thing which either Directly, or by way of Consequence might probably inferre this Affirmative Conclusion, [That God doth at any time punish the children for the fathers sins, or later ge∣nerations for the Iniquities of former;] This were to contradict that Funda∣mental Truth which the Lord himself hath so often protested by Oath, Ezek. 18. 1, 2, &c. And the word of the Lord came unto me again, saying: What mean ye that ye use this Proverb concerning the Land of Israel, saying; the Fa∣thers have eaten sour grapes, and the Childrens teeth are set on edge? As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this Proverb in Isra∣el. Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the Father, so also the soul of the Son is mine; the soul that sinneth it shall die. And again, verse the last; I have no pleasure in the death of him that dyeth, saith the Lord God: wherefore turn your selves and live ye.
Now to contradict any Branch of these or the like Protestations or Promi∣ses, would be to make shipwrack of Faith, more dangerous then to rush with full sail upon a Rock of Adamant.
On the other hand, if I should affirm any thing, either directly, or indirect∣ly, which might inferre any part of this Negative [That God doth not visit the sins of the Fathers upon the Children, or of former Generations upon later:] This were to strike upon a shelf no less dangerous then to dash against the for∣mer Rock; directly to contradict Gods solemn Declaration (in the second Commandement) of His Proceedings in this Case, which are no less just and equal, then the former Promise, Ezekiel the 18. By this you see the only safe way for passage through the straits proposed must be to find out the middle Line, or Mean, whether Medium Abnegationis, or Participationis; or in one word, The difference betwixt this Negative [God doth not punish the Children for the Fathers sins] and the other Affirmative [God visiteth the sins of the Fathers upon the Children, even unto the third and fourth Generation, &c.]
2. But in the very first setting forth, or entry into this narrow Passage, some here present perhaps have already discovered a shelf or sand, to wit, that the passage fore-cited, out of the second Commandement, doth better reach or fit the Case concerning Josiah his death, and the calamity of his people, then the present difficultie or Problem now in handling. For Josiah was but the third in succession from Manasseh, and dyed within fewer years, then a Generation in ordinary Construction imports, after his wicked Grand-father. But if the blood of Zachariah the son of Jehoiada, or other Prophets slain in that Age, or the Age after him, were required of this present Generation; God doth visit the sins of Fore-fathers upon the Children, after more then three or four, after more then five times five Generations, according to St. Matthew's account in the Genealogie of our Lord and Saviour. Yet this seeming Diffi∣culty (to use the Mariners Dialect) is rather an Over-fall then a shelf, or at the worst but such a shelf or sand as cannot hinder our passage if we sound it by the Line or Plummet of the Sanctuary, or number our Fathoms by the scale of sacred Dialect in like Cases. For when it is said in the Second Comman∣dement, that God doth visit the sins of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Him: This is, Numerus certus pro¦incerto aut indefinito: an expression or speech equivalent to that of the Pro∣phet