flee to false ones. This is Petitio principii, a beggerly begging of that
which is to be proved.
1. You must prove that the Scribes and Pharisees were not Pastors
in Office. So we did (say you) at the Disputation, thus: All Priests
were to be of the Tribe of Levi. But the Scribes and Pharisees were not
of the Tribe of Levi: Ergo, they were not Priests, and so by consequence
not men in Office.
A. We desired you to prove your minor, viz. That the Scribes
and Pharisees were not of the Tribe of Levi; which you did, thus:
Paul was a Pharisee, but not of the Tribe of Levi: Ergo no Pharisees
were of the Tribe of Levi.
A. We replyed, that this was but one particular instance, and so
could not make a rule, no more then one Swallow can make a Spring:
besides you were told, A particulari ad universale non valet conse∣quentia;
because one man is blind, ergo all men are blind; because
one Lay-Preacher is a Caviller, ergo all are Cavillers; because one
nayling Preacher is ignorant, ergo all are ignorant, &c. This was your
Bakers Logick, and it savours of the Peel.
But to clear this doubt, I shall give you one place that plainly proves
the Pharisees to be Priests and Levites, Ioh. 2. 19. compared with v. 24.
The Jews sent Priests and Levites from Hierusalem: and who were
they? v. 24. They that were sent, were of the Pharisees▪ So then
you see they were Pharisees, yet of the Tribe of Levi.
2. Giving▪ though not granting, that they were not of the Tribe of
Levi, yet that they were not bare gifted men, but Preachers in Office,
is clear, Mat. 23.
Secondly, They sit in Moses Chayr, (i. e.) had the ordinary Office
of Teaching the people committed to them: they were Doctors of the
Law; and Christ bids the people, Hear them.
3. The Priests were to be of the Tribe of Levi, but the Scribes and
Pharisees were Prophets; and these might be of any Tribe, as Ieremah
was, and other extraordinary Prophets.