§. 66. Of the extent of this word All things.
For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.
THe Apostle having largely and faithfully cited the very words of a Divine testi∣mony to confirm the excellency of Christ, he proceedeth to declare the mean∣ing thereof, in such particulars as most concerned the party intended.
The first particle a FOR, implieth an explanation of that which goeth before: as if he had said, David there speaketh of Christ, FOR this is the meaning of his words.
Herein lieth the force of the Apostles argument, David saith All things are put under the feet of the man of whom he speaketh.
But all things are put under the feet of none but of Jesus:
Therefore none but Jesus can be the man of whom David speaketh.
If any creature at all be exempted from that generall, All things, Christ is not ab∣solutely supream.
To shew that the force of the argument lieth in this generall, All things, the Apostle resumes the word of the Psalmist, thus, In that he put all in subjection un∣der him.
In this repetition, in stead of under his feet, this indefinite phrase is used, under him: which is in effect as much as the former. For they who are absolutely put under one, are put under his feet. A mans feet are part of himself. The for∣mer is the more emphaticall: but it was sufficient once to expresse that emphasis.
It cannot be denied but that this generall All, hath in sundry places restraints or limitations.
- 1. It restrains to all kindes and sorts of things as in this phrase, All things conti∣nue as they were from the beginning of the creation, 2 Pet. 3. 4. Many millions of par∣ticulars