The sovereigns prerogative and the subjects priviledge discussed betwixt courtiers and patriots in Parliament, the third and fourth yeares of the reign of King Charles : together with the grand mysteries of state then in agitation.

About this Item

Title
The sovereigns prerogative and the subjects priviledge discussed betwixt courtiers and patriots in Parliament, the third and fourth yeares of the reign of King Charles : together with the grand mysteries of state then in agitation.
Author
England and Wales. Parliament.
Publication
London :: Printed for Martha Harrison ...,
1657.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Great Britain -- History -- Charles I, 1625-1649.
Cite this Item
"The sovereigns prerogative and the subjects priviledge discussed betwixt courtiers and patriots in Parliament, the third and fourth yeares of the reign of King Charles : together with the grand mysteries of state then in agitation." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A40689.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 7, 2024.

Pages

Page 231

The answer to the Articles propounded by the Lord General and the rest of the Councel of War.

1. TO the first, we answer that by reason of the shallowness of the water the ships will not be able to come so near as the Pallizados, whereby to make any breach through for the victuallers.

2. To the second, we answer that nothing can be done by our forces here to gain any passage to the Town.

3. To the third, we answer that by reason our forces cannot come so near the Pallizadoes to make any breach, then it is not for the victuallers to venter in with their fire-ships; so no breach being made, the victualler will come into the Enemies hands.

4. To the fourth, we answer that the dishonour will be greater if there be any loss in that case.

5. To the fifth, we answer that in regard of their forces both by Sea and Land that no breach can be made as above said, our opinion is, it will be to no purpose to send any ships in.

We hold it not fitting to bring his Majesties ships, in regard they shall be exposed to shallow water and danger of our Enemies Forts, upon the Land; which will be an hazard and loss of his Majesties ships.

To the seventh, and the conclusion mentioned in your Lordships Articles, we answer, that if we should force the ships that lye without the Pallizado on the ground; It will rather make the Pallizado more strong than any way to gain any passage through. If any man can shew any better reasons than we here alleadge to those Articles, we shall be ready and willing to imbrace it, and will endeavour our selves so far as our lives.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.