They denyed that the Apostles were to have any successours in their Office,
affirming but two standing Officers, in the Church; Presbyterians, Deacons.
They cited Philippians I. I. I Tim. 3. 8. for the proof thereof; where there
is no mention of Bishops as distinct from Presbyters, but of the two Orders only,
of Bishops or Presbyters, and Deacons.
6. As for the succeeding ages to the Apostles, seeing Scripture reacheth
not unto them, they can but beget a humane Faith, which is uncertain and
fallible; Besides, such the darkness of those Times, in respect of Church-History
that little certainty can be thence extracted; Yet it appeareth in Clement
himself, that he useth the same word for Bishop and Presbyter; and as for
Ignatius his Epistles, little credit is to be given unto them.
7. Lastly, there is a great difference between Primitive Episcopacy and
the Present Hierarchie, as much enlarged in their Power, and Priviledges
by many Temporal accessions, whereof no shaddow or pretence in Scrip∣ture.
In conclusion, they humbly besought his Majesty, to look rather to the
Original of Bishops, in holy Writ, then to their succession in Humane History.
8. As to the point of Substantials in Church Government, appointed by
Christ, (wherein his Majesty desired satisfaction) the return was short and
generall, that such Substantials were in the Scripture, not descending to any
particulars. Whether out of policy, foreseeing it would Minister matter
of more debate, or obedience to the Parliament, as aliene from the work
they were designed for, who were only to oppose Episcopacy, as qualified in
the Bill presented to his Majesty.
9. Three days after, the King gave in his answer, to this first paper
of the Divines. Wherein he acknowledged, that the word Episcopus, (de∣noting
an Overseer in the generall sense,) agreeth as well to Presbyters, as
Ministers, in which respect they are sometimes in Scripture confounded,
both meeting in the joynt-function of overseeing Gods Flock. But soon after
Common usage, (the best Master of words) appropriated Episcopus to the Eccle∣siastical
Governor, leaving Presbyter to signifie the Ordinary Minister, or Priest,
as in the antient Fathers, and Councils doth plainly appear.
10. As to the Extraordinarie Calling of the Apostles, he confessed their
Vnction extraordinary, consisting in their miraculous gifts, which soon after
ceased when Churches were planted, but he urged their mission to govern and
teach; to be ordinary, necessary, and perpetual in the Church, the Bishops suc∣ceeding
them in the former, the Presbyters in later Function.
11. Their Evasion that Timothy and Titus were Evangelists, and not
Bishops, is clearly refuted by Scultetus, Gerard, and others, yea (as his
Majesty is informed) is rejected, by some rigid Presbyters, as Gillespee, Ro∣therford
&c. Besides, that Timothy and Titus were Bishops, is confirmed by
the consentient Testimony of Antiquity, (S. Hierome himself recording them
made by S. Pauls Ordination) as also by a Catalogue of twenty seven Bishops of
Ephesus, lineally succeeding from Timothy, as is avouched by D. Reinolds a∣gainst
Hart.
12. If the Angels mentioned in the Revelations, were not singular per∣sons,
who had a Prelacy over the Church, whether were they the whole Church,
or so many individual Pastors therein, or the whole Colledge of Presbyters, or
singular Presidents of those Colledges; for into so many opinions these few
are divided amongst themselves, who herein divide themselves from the
ancient Interpretation of the Church Government.
13. Concerning Ages succeeding the Apostles, his Majesty confesseth it
but a humane Faith, which is begotten on humane Testimonies, yet so that in
matter of Fact, it may be infallible, as by the Credit of History we infallibly
know that Aristotle was a Greek Philosopher.
14. The objected obscurity of Church-History, in primitive Times, is a
strong Argument for Episcopacy, which notwithstanding the darkness of