Christianismus redivivus Christndom both un-christ'ned and new-christ'ned, or, that good old way of dipping and in-churching of men and women after faith and repentance professed, commonly (but not properly) called Anabaptism, vindicated ... : in five or six several systems containing a general answer ... : not onely a publick disputation for infant baptism managed by many ministers before thousands of people against this author ... : but also Mr. Baxters Scripture proofs are proved Scriptureless ... / by Samuel Fisher ...

About this Item

Title
Christianismus redivivus Christndom both un-christ'ned and new-christ'ned, or, that good old way of dipping and in-churching of men and women after faith and repentance professed, commonly (but not properly) called Anabaptism, vindicated ... : in five or six several systems containing a general answer ... : not onely a publick disputation for infant baptism managed by many ministers before thousands of people against this author ... : but also Mr. Baxters Scripture proofs are proved Scriptureless ... / by Samuel Fisher ...
Author
Fisher, Samuel, 1605-1665.
Publication
London :: Printed by Henry Hills, and are to be sold by Francis Smith at his shop ...,
1655.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Infant baptism.
Baptists -- Apologetic works.
Cite this Item
"Christianismus redivivus Christndom both un-christ'ned and new-christ'ned, or, that good old way of dipping and in-churching of men and women after faith and repentance professed, commonly (but not properly) called Anabaptism, vindicated ... : in five or six several systems containing a general answer ... : not onely a publick disputation for infant baptism managed by many ministers before thousands of people against this author ... : but also Mr. Baxters Scripture proofs are proved Scriptureless ... / by Samuel Fisher ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A39566.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 16, 2024.

Pages

Re-Review.

Here reason demands of you why after baptism you admit not infants to the supper? and good reason too for cui signum et signatum, is a pigg of your own sow, and

I add; cui admissio, et accessio per, et post baptismum, cui incorporatio, ei continuatio, progressio, corporis communio fractione panis, et precibus, Acts 2.42. cui nativitas ei facultas auctrix, nutrix; et quare non nutrimen∣tum?

He that hath the thing signified (as infants of believers appear it seems to have to you, but not to us more then other infants i. e. indeed not at all) must have the sign, he that hath membership must have fellowship in things pertaining to the body, he that is once born growes, and is nourished, yea (to speak in Mr. Blakes phrase) being of the houshold, they must have of the food of the houshold, the stewards of the mysteries of God must be accountable in case they do deny it, why therefore should not infants have the supper?

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.