The proceedings in the House of Commons, touching the impeachment of Edward, late Earl of Clarendon, Lord High-Chancellour of England, Anno 1667 with the many debates and speeches in the House, the impeachment exhibited against him, his petition in answer thereto : as also the several weighty arguments concerning the nature of treason, bribery, &c. by Serj. Maynard, Sir Ed. S., Sir T.L., Mr. Vaughan, Sir Rob. Howard, Mr. Hambden [sic], and other members of that Parliament : together with the articles of high-treason exhibited against the said Earl, by the Earl of Bristol in the House of Lords on the 10th of July, 1663 : with the opinion of all the learned judges therein.
About this Item
Title
The proceedings in the House of Commons, touching the impeachment of Edward, late Earl of Clarendon, Lord High-Chancellour of England, Anno 1667 with the many debates and speeches in the House, the impeachment exhibited against him, his petition in answer thereto : as also the several weighty arguments concerning the nature of treason, bribery, &c. by Serj. Maynard, Sir Ed. S., Sir T.L., Mr. Vaughan, Sir Rob. Howard, Mr. Hambden [sic], and other members of that Parliament : together with the articles of high-treason exhibited against the said Earl, by the Earl of Bristol in the House of Lords on the 10th of July, 1663 : with the opinion of all the learned judges therein.
Author
England and Wales. Parliament. House of Commons.
Publication
[London :: s.n.],
1700.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Clarendon, Edward Hyde, -- Earl of, 1609-1674.
Trials (Treason) -- England.
Great Britain -- History -- Charles II, 1660-1685.
Cite this Item
"The proceedings in the House of Commons, touching the impeachment of Edward, late Earl of Clarendon, Lord High-Chancellour of England, Anno 1667 with the many debates and speeches in the House, the impeachment exhibited against him, his petition in answer thereto : as also the several weighty arguments concerning the nature of treason, bribery, &c. by Serj. Maynard, Sir Ed. S., Sir T.L., Mr. Vaughan, Sir Rob. Howard, Mr. Hambden [sic], and other members of that Parliament : together with the articles of high-treason exhibited against the said Earl, by the Earl of Bristol in the House of Lords on the 10th of July, 1663 : with the opinion of all the learned judges therein." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A38261.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 3, 2024.
Pages
December, 16.
The said Reasons from the Lord being
Reported and Considered, and it being
Moved that the House would declare them∣selve
unsatisfied with them.
Sir Tho. Cliff.
I am against passing a Vote
at present upon the Lords Reasons, but
read the Bill sent down from thence,
and Summons him by it to appear by a
Day.
Mr. Trev.
Some are against the Bill, be∣cause
it goes too far, Condemning before
Hearing, others would have it to go far∣ther.
Summons is in Order to Hearing,
Tryal, and Judgment; of those he hath
made himself incapable by Flight, and hath
in his Paper told you, That he will nei∣ther
be heard, nor tryed by you: Tho' you
expected to have him secured by a gene∣ral
Accusation, yet you never expected
Judgment upon it. Then it is said, This
Banishment falls short of Treason, but we are
not to pass Sentence for Crimes but as a
Council propound to the King what is ne∣cessary
in this Case: Then consider whether
descriptionPage 126
this Bill will Answer our Ends, and if it
doth, delay will make it worse; I think
we should make it reach them. What if
he hath Life in other Parts, his Family
Untainted, and his Children alive, and en∣joy
his Estate?
Sir Rob. Carr.
You have Ordered to con∣sider
the Reasons from the Lords, there∣fore
do it.
Mr. Hen. Covent.
The Motion to read the
Bill is not against your Order, because
part of the Reasons given by the Lords
is, That you have a Bill, and till you have
read the Bill, you cannot lay by the Reasons.
The Earl of Clarendon is fled, you have a
tye upon him in having his Innocent Re∣lations,
and by Proceeding farther, you
make him desperate, you are now in an
even way with the Lords; therefore read
the Bill.
Mr. Swins.
You may go upon the Rea∣sons,
and yet not reject the Bill; for when
you sent to the Lords about a Proclama∣tion,
and went not upon the Bill, it was,
because what the Bill drives at is the
highest Punishment next to Death. There∣fore
Consider what weight is in the Rea∣sons;
One of them seeming to put you
upon the Bill, they put you thereupon on a
Legislative Way; they will neither Secure
descriptionPage 127
nor Summon him, but will Condemn him
Unheard. They cannot Secure him upon
a Charge of Treason, nor yet Summon
him, but they can Condemn him; and this
they put you upon, which is against Ho∣nour
and Justice, especially to do it up
on Reason of State. The Legislative Power
of Parliaments is great, it hath no bound
but the Integrity and Justice of Parlia∣ments.
If Reason of State be a Motive
of Parliament to Banish one Man, so it
may be for many. If you go in this Le∣gislative
way, you bring upon your selves
all the Dishonour of the Business, but the
Lords will have some excuse, which you
cannot, for they look'd upon the Charge
so flight, as not to Imprison him; the
party is gone, because he was not Secu∣red,
apprehending (he saith) fear of the
Multitude, not of his Tryal, so that the
Lords not giving Credit to your Charge
against him, he says, he flies not from justice.
Now, if upon this Bill you shall Banish
him, it would be said you could not make
good the Charge; and therefore laid this
Sentence upon him.
The President is also dangerous, if ha∣ving
gone so far in a Judicial Way, you
should now go in a Legislative. If upon
Reason of State Lords may be Banished,
it may be by dozens: As you proceed
Justly, so you will be Justified.
descriptionPage 128
Nor is the Danger greater if the Lords
go by Proclamation, and he be put into
Custody when he comes, if he can practice
any Thing, will not he be less capable
when under the Proclamation, than when
this Bill is Passed, which Condemns him
without Hearing, and I am not for any
Punishment till Heard. In Cromwells Case,
who Moved in Hen. VIII. time, to Attaint
a Lord Unheard, the Judges declared they
might, and it would stand, afterward the
said Cromwell was Attainted and Condem∣ned
Unheard, and such Councel usually
falls upon those that Councell'd it.
Sir Rob. How.
The Earl of Clarendon saith,
That he doth not withdraw from your Iu∣stice,
but fear of Tumults; but that Reason
any Man may give for his flying, if it
will be an excuse; but he might have se∣cured
himself from Tumults by rendring
himself, and his Innocency upon his Tryal
would have cleared him. This at last may
come to a free Conference, then you may
be left to go along with the King; the
House riseth and doth nothing, and then
the World will see that this Business will
assure the King of France, That he hath
a Man with him so Great, as to hin∣der
us from doing any Thing against
him: Therefore as you ought to do
something against him, see whether it
may not be done by the Bill by resuming
descriptionPage 129
his Lands, &c, if he come not in by a
Day.
An Exception may be against this way,
Namely, That there is no Attainder, but
if there had been such a Bill, the Thing
which should sway me should be the Duke
of York's Marriage: So, that if you
Commit this Bill, you may add all Severi∣ties,
except that of Attainder, and if he
come by a Day, then all to be void. If
you go by Proclamation, the Lords may
not Concur and you loose your Ends. By
this Bill all favour that he can expect is
shewed, and this way will be the best
Confutation of the Lords Reasons; there∣fore
Commit the Bill.
Mr, Secretary Morr.
I am for Committing
the Bill, tho' it be condemning Unheard;
because he could not but conclude it would
be so. Et volenti non fit Injuria.
Sir Ric. Temp.
You have proceeded against
this Earl in all ordinary ways, and have
been baffled by the Lords. In Edward the
Third's Reign, Adam de Berry fled, and a
Proclamation went against him, and the
Commons neither did, nor ever were bound
to deliver their Articles till the Party
appeared, and in that Case they delivered
not their Articles till the last Day, when
descriptionPage 130
he not appearing was Convicted. When
you would go by Attainder, they tell you,
Deliver special Matter, and we will Summon
him; when you ask a Proclamation, they tell
you, Deliver special Matter: If you declare
the Matter to the Court, it is upon Re∣cord,
and all may know it. You have tryed
all ways Legal and Regular, and they will
do you Justice in neither. Now what can
you do? except you and the Lords combine
in Justice together, he must escape, and
if you can be made to differ, he goes away
in a Smoak. If you go to the King for a
Proclamation, you must return to the Lords
for Justice. I am sorry the Ivey hath been
so near the Oak, that you cannot touch it,
without touching that. There remains a
Bill before you, and in that you are upon
equal Terms with the Lords; therefore
give him a Day to be Heard, and if he
come, let him, but then his Penalties are
too low for his Crimes; therefore read
the Bill, go higher, degrade him of Ho∣nours,
Forfeit his Lands, and whether you
will go so far, I leave with you.
Mr. Soll. Gene.
It is not possible to agree
with the Lords in their Reasons, but the
Reason must be because the Bill is good.
But if any Man thinks it is good upon the
Lords Reasons he is mistaken; and there∣fore
my Advice is to proceed upon the
descriptionPage 131
Bill, tho' not upon the Reasons from the
Lords. Some think the Punishment in the
Bill too little for the Crime, others too
much, because not Summon'd; so that it
must fall out, That a Person Impeached
by the House of Commons must see the House
rise without any marks of displeasure up∣on
him: Can any Man be Heard, who will
not be Heard? Why should not you pro∣ceed
in such a way against him, as whose
very Flight amounts to a Confession? And
have you not burnt his Paper for refie∣cting
upon the House? and can you think he
will appear who is departed in despair of
the Court? and now you are contending to
give him time.
Then consider the Thing in it self. Sup∣pose
the King had a mind to Attaint him,
the King can do it without your help, for
he may be Outlawed for High-Treason; for
tho' that be Reversable at Common-Law,
if he be beyond Sea, yet by two express
Acts of Parliament it is otherwise, but
the King cannot Banish him without your
Concurrence: Suppose him Fled and At∣tainted,
so that the Question is not upon
his Life, but his Estate, suppose your Ju∣stice
satisfied in that, is it not past all
manner of Consideration that the King can∣not
upon Application restore it? So, that
all you lookt for by Attainder, is done
descriptionPage 132
by this Bill of Banishment, for his Life is
saved by Flight, as would his Estate by
Compassion; but there is something in this
Bill, which, without it, you can never get,
that is, you put him under your Displea∣sure,
which, the King cannot Pardon; and
and will you have it thought abroad, that
the Earl of Clarendon, fled as he is, hath
been something too hard for the Two
Houses?
Sir Tho. Litt.
If there be a necessity of
differing with the Lords, and I thought
the difference would produce such Effects,
I should not speak, but they only tell
you 'tis unnecessary and ineffectnal. You
have Impeached, and are now told if you
proceed, it will make difference; but I
fear another greater Danger than this dif∣ference.
The World will say you were
willing he should fly, because you could
not prove by flying he hath Forfeited his
Estate; if the King give it him again it is
his Mercy; but do you Justice: Therefore
press for a Proclamation, for the Bill is
inconsistent with your Honour.
Mr. Vaugh.
I have listned with much at∣tention
to this Discourse, and understand
it as little now as at the beginning, the
Discourse being nothing adequate to that
end. You have Reasons from the Lords
descriptionPage 133
why They agree not with you, and if you
agree with the Reasons, the Summ is to
read the Bill; but if you agree not, you
must desire a Conference, and if they Con∣cur,
you may have a Proclamation, if not
(as I think they will not) you are where
you were: We suppose him not to be in
England, and if so, what is the Procla∣mation
more than the King's Writ? it
reacheth no Man out of the Kingdom. Its
true, in some Cases, if the Persons are
gone out of the Land they are Summon'd,
and if they come not, their Lands are Sei∣zed,
but it is not by Proclamation, which
signifies nothing if the Party be gone.
Then go on, suppose the Lords Joyn
in desiring a Proclamation, the end of
which is Appearing and Apprehending,
possibly you gain one part, that if he be
apprehended, they do Imprison him upon
a general Impeachment; but if they agree
not, what benefit have you by it? None:
But if he appears, to what is it? there is
no Charge, if apprehended, to Answer the
general Charge.
Then the Third way is, if the Lords
agree not, that you should go to the King,
and there is a more dangerous Rock in
that, than in any thing; for we never heard
of a Commitment per ipsum Dominum Regem,
descriptionPage 134
but per mandatum Domini Regis, because
against the King lies no Damages: What
then must you do? many think it injustice
to proceed, if he be not called by Pro∣clamation.
But it is plain, if you proceed
upon this Bill, you go not upon your Im∣peachment,
but because he is fled from the
Justice of the Land, wherewith you have
Charged him in burning his Paper; and it
imports little, that he saith he is Innocent;
for why then doth he fly? Shall we abate
him of what he ought to suffer for his
saying so? He is fled from the Justice of
the Parliament, and therefore is proceeded
with, and for what others say, you ought
not to regard popular Reasons, but to pur∣sue
your own; it is enough for you to
hear some Proofs made: When was it
known in any Court, that Proofs should
be taken only on one side? So that you
cannot acquit your own Justice, nor bring
him any ways to Answer, he being gone,
nor can you have any effect of the Pro∣clamation,
tho' the Lords join in it: There∣fore
unless you will have nothing done
after all this, (for he may not be Guilty of
all Charged, who yet hath made himself
Guilty of what is Charged by flying) Read
the Bill.
descriptionPage 135
At last the Question was put, whe∣ther
the Bill should be Read and Com∣mitted.
109 for it.
55 against it.
164
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.