Tractatus duo singulares de Exami∣ne Sagarum, &c. Two Singular Treatises of the Tryal of Witches cast upon cold Water, in which, the Be∣ginning of this Tryal, its nature and truth is curiously sought into, and di∣vers Questions out of the Writings of Divines, Physicians, and Philoso∣phers, are most Learnedly and Plea∣santly resolved. At Francfort and Lipsia, at the Costs of Henry Greut∣zius, 1686, in 4to.
THE first of the two Treatises that is given us here, was made by one of the Magistrates of Bonn in the Country of Cologne, to justifie the Practice of some Judges of Germany, who for a long time make use of the proof of Water, when they have a mind to try if a Woman is a Witch. All her Cloaths are taken off, her right Hand is tied to her left Foot, and the left Hand with the right Foot; then she is cast into Water, and if she doth not sink under water she is believed guilty, and is burned. Great Wits which examine but by halves what they deny, are not in∣cumbred with this Objection, they say, that they are all Chimeras, and that there must be no belief given to such Stories: but those that penetrate into things with an extream exactness before they affirm or deny them, are incomparably more irre∣solute upon a fact so strange as this; on the one hand they have difficulty to compre∣hend why this proof availeth 'not but in certain places, and why if it be certain, all the Tribunals of the World do not make use of it when they have occasion. Besides, their knowing that the proof of a hot Iron, that of boyling Water, and some others made use of in times past in divers places to discover where the unjustice or justice of an accusation subsists, and that they have been condemned by the Church, be∣cause without doubt they perceived there was illusion in all this, and that Knaveries were intermixed, which often times did op∣press Innocence, and justified Criminals. However it is, our Author pretends that this Tryal of Witches is lawful. His name is Rickius, and speaks very bad Latine. Perhaps he was a better Citizen than a Wit.
He at first proposeth to himself a great number of Objections which usually are made against the practice he maintaineth, and which are for the most part weakness it self. The best of all is, that God must not be tempted, and that this is to tempt him, to commit the decision of a Process to a most Signal Miracle of his Providence. But this Objection would not be conside∣rable, if we were assured that the proof whereof we speak hath never fail'd; for we should have reason to believe in that case, God hath established the immersion of People Confederate with the Devil, as an occasional cause of the discovery of this Plot, in engaging himself to hinder the natural effect of heaviness. An Experience constantly reiterated would be a revelation significative enough of this Institution of God, so that without tempting him we might have recourse to it when it would be necessary. There are an hundred ex∣amples in Scripture which shew that God hath not disapproved that Signs should be required of him and Prodigies, to be well assured of a matter, and we must hold as undoubtful, that the Church would never have condemned the proofs of Hot iron, if they had not strong Reasons of doubting that they were a good Warrant of Justice or Unjustice. The Objection that is founded upon the Supposition that it is the Devil who holds Witches Suspended upon the Surface of the Water, is miserable, for it is against all the light of a good Reason, that the Devil should employ his Forces to be∣tray Creatures which are the most devoted unto him, and to make Judges Triumph over his Subjects who have a Design to send them into the fire. It is, say they, because God forceth there Proud Spirits to Act against their proper interest: But be∣sides that, they say this without forming a distinct Idea of the manner wherewith these Spirits may be forced to produce cer∣tain Actions; Who seeth but a constraint of this nature ought not to hinder Magistrates to verifie by the Experience of Water if a Woman be a Witch, seeing that whether God Acteth therein by his immediate Ver∣tue, or forces the Devils to work this Pro∣digie, it is still his wise and admirable Providence which would make use of this means to teach Judges what they know not? These Two Objections, which are the best of all, being ruined, it seems that the only means to refute this practice is to make the foundation of these Proofs sus∣picious of falshood; but as the Author strives only against those that agree with him in the fact, there is nothing to be fear∣ed on that side.