The antiquities of Warwickshire illustrated from records, leiger-books, manuscripts, charters, evidences, tombes, and armes : beautified with maps, prospects and portraictures / by William Dugdale.

About this Item

Title
The antiquities of Warwickshire illustrated from records, leiger-books, manuscripts, charters, evidences, tombes, and armes : beautified with maps, prospects and portraictures / by William Dugdale.
Author
Dugdale, William, Sir, 1605-1686.
Publication
London :: Printed by Thomas Warren,
1656.
Rights/Permissions

This text has been selected for inclusion in the EEBO-TCP: Navigations collection, funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Cite this Item
"The antiquities of Warwickshire illustrated from records, leiger-books, manuscripts, charters, evidences, tombes, and armes : beautified with maps, prospects and portraictures / by William Dugdale." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A36791.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 19, 2024.

Pages

Langley.

THat this was originally a member of Sutton (in which parish it lyes) I incline to believe for in 37 H. 3. which is the first mention that ever saw of it, Walter de Bereford did (inter alia) grant a to Walter his son L. acres of land lying in Lonkeleye, Blackmore and Brockhurst, all which are said to be within the territory of Sutton: So that hence I conclude, that the same Walter, or his ancestors, first had it from one of the antient Earls of Warwick; adding thereto, that by a multitude of b Inquisitions it appeareth to have been of their Fee. But all the farther mention that I find of this Walter, is in the Shiriffs Accompt c of 23 H. 3. and that in 36 H. 3. he brought an Assise d of No∣vell disseisin against Nich. L'ile for certain Com∣mon of pasture in Moxhull. To whom succeeded Walter his son and heir; and to him Osbert de Bereford, who in 2 E. 1. was constituted Shiriff e of this Countie and Leicestershire; as also the next year ensuing, a Commissioner f for levying a Fif∣teenth; and in 8 E. 1. Shiriff g again of these Counties: And to him William his brother; for he and his descendants went away with this Lang∣ley, and certain lands in Wishaw, Sutton, Curdworth, Minworth, Midleton, and Wiggin∣shill in this Countie; as also Stapleford in Leice∣stershire.

Which Will. was in 16 E. 1. a h Kt. and being learned in the Laws, in 2 E. 2. had the Chief-Ju∣sticeship of the Common Pleas conferred i upon him. But about three years after such his advance∣ment to that eminent place, there was an high Complaint k made against him to the King, by Iohn de Someri (a great Baron in these parts) for words of defamation; viz. that he did so domineere in Staffordshire, that no man could enjoy the benefit of Law or reason. taking upon him more autho∣ritie than a King; as also that it was no abiding for any thereabouts, unlesse they did bribe him in con∣tributing largely towards the building of his Castle (at Dudley) And moreover that the said Iohn did use to beset mens Houses in that Countrey, threat∣ning to murther them, except they gave him what he would demand. Whereupon the King issued a Commission l to Alan la Zouche and Will. Trussell, to enquire thereof; and in case the words were proved, then to find out whether the before specified Iohn were really guilty of those misde∣meanours, and to certifie the truth therein.

How he answered this businesse, appears not; but

Page 672

in 8 E. 2. I find m that he was one of the Justices of Assize in this County; so likewise n in 13 E. 2. As also a Benefactor to the Canons of Kenil∣worth, by granting o to them Lx. acres of land and two acres of meadow, lying in Radford-Simelie; and that he departed p this world in 20 E. 2. lea∣ving Edmund his son and heir 28 years of age, who did his homage the same year, and had livery q of his lands. Which Edmund in 1 E. 3. obtained License r from the King, to fortifie his Mannour House here at Langley, with a wall of lime and stone, and to embattle it. In that Record the K. calls him dilectus Clericus noster, yet was he then a Knight; for in a Release s bearing date at Chau∣cumbe the same year, whereby Henry de Bereford Parson of the Church of Corson, gave up unto him all his right in this Mannour, as also in Wi∣shaw, he is so stiled; the sealing whereof was some∣what observabe. In cuus ri testimonium (saith the Parson) Sigillum meum apposui; Et quia Si∣gillum meum plurimis est incognitum, Sigillum Ro∣geri Hillari nepotis mei apponi procuravi. Where∣unto were witnesses Sir Gilbert de Elsefield, Sir Sim. de Bereford, Sir Miles de Beauchamp, Sir Iames de Audley, and Sir Iohn de Broughton, Kts. Rog. Hillari, Iohn Dimock and others. Which instance, as it shews of what regard Seals were antiently, so doth it give me an oportunitie to say something as to the original use of them in this Realm, and of the great esteem, wherein they have continued ever since.

That K. Edw. the Confessor, was the first here in England, that ever put Seal to his Charters, is ve∣ry evident; and that he did so in imitation of the Normans, amongst whom he had been educated, is not to be doubted; but till after the Conquest, we have no testimony that they were used here by a∣ny Subject, as Ingulphus t manifesteth.—Nam Chirographorū confectionem Anglicanam (saith he) quae antea, us{que} ad Edv. Regis tempora fidelium prae∣sentium subscriptionibus, cum Crucibus aureis, aliis{que} sacris signaculis firma fuerunt, Normanni condem∣nantes, Chirographa Cartas vocabant, & Charta∣rum firmitatem cum cerea impressione, per unius cujus{que} speciale Sigillum, sub instillatione trium vel quatuor testium astantium conficere constituebant. Conferebantur enim prim ò multa praedia nudo ver∣bo abs{que} scripto vel Charta; tantùm cum Domini Gla∣dio, vel Galea, vel Cornu, vel Cratera, & plurima te∣nementa cum Calcari, cum Srigili, cum Arcu, & nonnulli cum Sagitta; Sed haec initio Regni sui (speaking of Will. the Conq.) posterioribus annis immutatus est iste modus.

But that this use of Sealing was of greater anti∣quity, with the French, I shall exhibite the testi∣mony of a learned person, from whom I have abstracted what follows. Karolus de gratia Rex Francorum &c. Notum sit omnibus &c. qualiter vir illustris Rogerus Comes fidelis noster &c. Mo∣nasterium &c. in loco nuncupato Karrofum &c. in pago Pictavense construxit &c. Et ut haec praesens auctoritas nostris & futuris temporibus inviolata perducare valeat, manus nostrae signaculis eam de∣crevimus roborari, & de Annulo nostro jussimus Sigillari (circa An. D. DClxix.)

In w nomine domini Dei &c. Hludovicus divina ordinante clementia Imperator Augustus, Notum sit &c. Haec verò authoritas, ut nostris futuris{que} temporibus melius credatur &c. manu propria subscripsimus, & de Annulo nostro subter jussimus Sigillari. Dat. &c. An. D. DCCCxiiii.

But I return to England. That our Kings, and all great persons, antiently used their own pictures in the impressions of their Seales, is very evident; Militarie men allways on Horsback, and in the same kind of Armour that they wore, which in the elder times was Male, for the most part, with a Shield on the left Arme and in the right hand a na∣ked Sword: upon which Shields 'tis rare before K. Ric. 1. time, to see any distinct charge, at least such as became hereditary; but after that, it was held a great honour for those whose Ancestors had served in the Holy Warrs, to retain in the same Badges and Marks, which they there bore; so that then they did not only continue them upon their Shields, but to be the better known, had the like depicted upon surcoats of silke, behind and before, which they wore over their Male, as in those ex∣cellent observations x made upon Vpton by that learned gentleman, and my singular Friend Edw. Bisshe Esq is made most evident; and as is farther testified by Iohn Rous yTempore Regis Ioh. (saith he) erant in Sigillis Dominorum, tunicae su∣per loricis, non autem ante: erant autem tunicae longae ad talos. But after this, ere long, divers bore their Armes on fair, large, and deep Shields, in their Seales; and some on the reverse, where the picture on Horsback was on the other side; of which the same Author saith zCirciter annum MCCxviii, Domini, qui in Sigillis more solito habe∣bant Equites armatos cum gladiis, nunc in dorso si∣gillorum Arma sua posuerunt de novo in Scutis. Howbeit, in Edw. 1. days and after, most men be∣gan to leave of their pictures on Horsback in their Seals; which custome by degrees declining, was utterly given over in Edw. 3. time; So that our Historian observes—Post a captionem Johannis Regis Franciae (an. sc. 1356) Domini at{que} Generosi, relictis imaginibus Equitum in Sigillis, posuerant Arma sua in parvis Scutis.

Now in what reverend esteem this practise of Sealing hath antiently been, may be observed from these testimonies. sc. Of a Charter made by K. H. 1. unto the Abby of Evesham, touching the Hun∣dred of Blackherst, and divers Liberties, it appea∣reth, that being exhibited to K. H. 3. and through rude handlng, the Seal cloven in sunder, that the validity thereof might not be lessened, the K. forth∣with caused it to be confirmed (3 Maii 25 H. 3.) with this b clause—Ne igitur praefata Carta, oc∣casione fissurae praedictae, processu temporis ab aliquo possit haberi vitiosa, hac praesenti Charta nostra dux∣imus testificandum, quod praedictum Sigillum sanum & integrum recepimus: Statuentes per hanc Car∣tam nostram, & pro nobis & haeredibus nostris fir∣miter percipientes, quod praedicta Cartae avi praefati Henrici avi nostri, nichilominus esse idem robur, & omnem eandem efficaciam habeat imperpetuum, quod haberet si Sigillum integrum esset & indivi∣sum, sicut fuit quando praefatus Abbas eam nobis liberavit.

And for counterfaiting another man's Seal ob∣serve what punishment was antiently used.c Rex Vice comiti Oxon: Mandamus tibi quod Anketil∣lum Manvers, qui captus fuit pro falsina Sigilli Ro∣berti de Veteri ponte, abjurare facias terram nostram; & ipsum postea sine dilatione mittas ad mare, per a∣liquos de tuis, qui videant quod exeat à terra nostra &c. T. Rege apud Clipston 27 Martii. Nay so tender was every man in those times, of his Seal, that in case he accidentally had lost it, care was ta∣ken to publish the same, least another might make

Page 673

use of it to his detriment, as is manifest in the case of Benedict de Hagham in 54 H. 3. Where the Record runs thus, Memorandum quod publicè clamatum est in Banco, quod Sigillum Benedicti de Hagham, cum uno capite in medio sub nomine suo, in quacun{que} manu fuerit, de caetero nullum robur op∣tineat. And not much unlike to this is that of Henry de Perpount, a person of great quality, in 8 E. 1. Memorandum quod Henricus de Perpount die Lune in crast. Octab. beati Mich. venit in Cancellaria apud Lincolniam, & publicè dixit quod Sigillum amisit, & protestabatur, quod si aliquod instrumentum cum Sigillo illo post tempus illud in∣veniretur consignatum, illud nullius esse valoris vel momenti. As also, that in 7 E. 2. Iohannes E. recognovit in Cancellaria Regis se amisisse Sigillum suum, & petit quod dicto Sigillo deinceps non habea∣tur fides.

Nay by a Pleading in 9 H. 3. I find, that CC. marks damages was recovered against Henry de Grendon, and Will. de Grendon by Sir Raph de Crop∣hull Knight, for forcibly breaking a Seal from a Deed. And in 13 E. 3. when by misfortune a Deed, then shewed in the Chancerie, was severed from the Seal, in the presence of the Lord Chance∣lour, and other noble persons, command was not only given, for the affixing it again thereto, but an Exemplification made thereof under the great Seal of England, with a recitall of the premises. Nor is that publication made by Iohn de Greseley of Drakelow in Com. Derb. 18 R. 2. upon the losse of his Seal, lesse considerable Notum sit omnibus Christianis, quod ego Ioh. Greseley non habui pote∣statem Sigilli mei per unum annum integrum ulti∣mo praeteritum, jam notifico in bona memoria & sa∣na mente; & Scripta Sigillo meo contradico & de∣nego in omnibus à tempore praedicto us{que} in diem re∣staurationis Sigilli praedicti. In cujus rei testimo∣nium Sigillum Decanatus de Repindon apposui. Testibus domino Thoma Stafford milite, Ioh. Ar∣derne, Ioh Corsoun de Ketleston, & Rog. de Mont∣gomeri. Dat. apud Drakelow xviii R. 2.

And here we see, that as Henry de Bereford pro∣cured his nephew Roger Hillari, to affix his Seal to that Instrument before mentioned, in regard it was more known (which hath occasioned this di∣gression) so doth Iohn de Gresely now cause the Seal of the Deanry of Repindon to be put to his Deed. A multitude of Examples in the like kind I could produce; some of the Seals of Bishops, some of Deans and Chapters, some of Corporations, and some of sundry eminent persons, whose Seals were most notable, but for brevities sake I forbear; concluding my discourse of this matter with that which is very observable; viz. that King Iohn, whilst he was Earl of Moreton, to his grant of the Church of Hope in Derbyshire made unto the Ca∣nons of Lichfield, affixed his gold Ring, with a Turky stone in it, to the silk string whereunto the Seal was put, with this expression knon so∣lum Sigilli mi impressione, sed proprii Annuli ap∣positione roboravi. But further concerning Seales I refer my Reader to the learned Selden's Titles of Honour, Part 2. Cap. 5. Sect. 37.

And so returning to Sir Edmund de Bereford, I find, that in 9 E. 3. his Seal l of Armes was Crusu∣le fichè and three flowre de lices, the colour sable and the field Arg. which coat hath a good affinity with Hillaries before mentioned; that differing from this in nothing but a border, as the Seal m al∣so sheweth. In 25 E. 3. this Sir Edmund, ha∣ving by his Testament n, made at Brightwell in Oxfordshire, bequeathed his body to sepulture in the Priory of Chaucumbe, betwixt the steps and the Altar, in the midst of the floor, if with conve∣niency it might be: and to his poor Tenants of Chaulgrave in Oxfordshire; Shotswell, Derset, Wishaw, Wiginhill, Maney, Sutton, Bike∣mershe, and Thorpe, all in this County, given li∣berall Legacies, died o in 28 E. 3. leaving Iohn his son, possest of most of his lands, by vertue of a spe∣cial p entail in 22 E. 3. For it seems he was q ille∣gitimate.

  • Gualt. de Bereford 37 H. 3. - Margria domina de Apelby.
    • Walt. de Bereford.
      • Osbertus de Bereford 2 E. 1.
      • Will. de Bereford miles 16 E 1.
        • Iohanna ux. Gilb. de Elsfield.
          • D. Gilb. de Elsfield 25 E. 3.
            • Guliel. de Elsfield obiit 21 R. 2.
              • Anna filia & cohaeres. - .....
                • Iohanna - Ioh. Hore de Childer∣ley 8 H. 4.
                  • Gilbertus Hore ar. 16 H. 6.
                    • Thomas Hore obiit 20 H. 6.
                      • Gilb. Hore obiit infra aetat.
                      • Ioh. Hore.
                        • Rowl. fil. Henr. Pudsey de Barford & Bolton in Com. Ebor. filii & haer. Ioh. Pudsey mil. - Editha consangu & haeres Gilb. Hore, aet. 40 an. 7 H. 8. - Thomas Fulthorp de Castro Bernar∣di 19 H. 7.
                          • Will. Pudsey.
                            • Robertus Pudsey. - Alianora filia Hug. Harman de Morehall.
                              • Georgius Pudsey ar. - Margareta filia Will. Gibbons.
                                • Georgius Pudsey an. 1640. - Matilda filia Humfr. Cotton de Bothe, ux. r.
                                • Ric. Pudsey obiit sine prole.
                                • Mich. Pudsey.
                                  • Georgius Pudsey.
              • Iuliana uxor Thomae de Loundres.
        • Margar. ux. Jac. de Audle.
        • Agnes ux. Ioh. Ma∣travers.
        • Edm. de Bereford obiit 28 E. 1.
          • Ioh de Bere∣ford, nothus. - Alianora filia Ric. Comitis, Arundeliae
          • Baldw. de Bere∣ford miles, frater & haeres defunctus sine prole 1 H. 6.
        • Joh. de Bereford 6 E. 2.
      • Rob. de Bereford.

Page 674

Which Iohn wedded r Alianore daughter to Ric. Earl of Arundell, and after that, another wife; but dying s in Gascoin 30 E. 3. left Baldwin his brother and heir xxiiii years of age. This Baldwin was a Knight t in 36 E. 3. and in 1 R. 2. constituted by Thomas de Holland (half brother to the K.) chief Guardian u of all the Forests on this side Trent, his Lievtenant in that Office. In 4 R. 2. he had Free warren w granted to him in all his demesn lands and Woods of Brightwell, Chalgrave, Newnham, and Rufford in Com. Oxon. Stene and Fernyng∣ho in Com. Northampt. Bykmersh, Shotswell and Wyshaw in this County, with Sutton and Meysham in Derbyshire: And in the same year was made Keeper x of the King's Park at Eltham, for life; with a Fee of iii d. per diem, to be recei∣ved out of the Rents of that Mannour. He was a speciall favourite and a powerfull man with K. Ric. 2. For besides the discharge y of an C li. due by him for the Wardship and Marriage of Iohn the son and heir of Iohn de Odingsells, he is noted z to be one of those, who had the Character of an evill Counceller, given him by that tumultuous Parlia∣ment, held in 11 R. 2. and thereupon, with the Lord Zouch, and divers other great men, expelled the Court.

But the affection born towards him by the King, was not without great cause, I presume; For he had been servant to his Father the Black Prince, retained a by Covenant for life, as well in Peace as Warr, having an Annuity of xl li. per an. granted unto him out of the Lordship of Coventre; which the said King not only confirmed, after his Father's decease, whilst h was Prince of Wales, but again in b the first year of his reign.

This Sir Baldwin had a Bear for his Crest c, in regard it alluded so near to his name (a course very frequent in those times:) And having no issue, he setled a great part of his estate, by Fine d, upon Iohn Hore and Ioane his wife; which Ioane was grand∣child e by a coheir, to Will. de Ellesfield, and he grandchild of Gilb. de Ellesfield, by Ioane f eldest sister to Sir Edmund de Bereford before spoken of, as the Dscent doth shew. This Iohn being g of Childerley in Cambridgshire, and likewise Gilbert his h his son, resied wholy there: After which ere long, viz. about the beginning of H. . time, their male line extinguished, and this Lord∣ship with other lands came to the Pudseys: For Edith cosyn and heir to the last Gilbert Hore, residing at her Mannour of Ellesfield near Oxford, having a speciall liking to Rowland Pud∣sey, a younger son to Henry Pudsey of Barford and Bolton in Yorkshire, then a Student in that Uni∣versity, and a Genleman much accomplisht, took him for her husband, the posterity of which Row∣and and Edith, have ever since enjoy'd it.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.