Stafford's memoires, or, A brief and impartial account of the birth and quality, imprisonment, tryal, principles, declaration, comportment, devotion, last speech, and final end, of William, late lord viscount Stafford, beheaded upon Tower-hill on Wednesday the 29. of December 1681 hereunto is also annexed a short appendix concerning some passages in Stephen Colleges trial.

About this Item

Title
Stafford's memoires, or, A brief and impartial account of the birth and quality, imprisonment, tryal, principles, declaration, comportment, devotion, last speech, and final end, of William, late lord viscount Stafford, beheaded upon Tower-hill on Wednesday the 29. of December 1681 hereunto is also annexed a short appendix concerning some passages in Stephen Colleges trial.
Author
Corker, James Maurus, 1636-1715.
Publication
[London :: s.n.],
1681.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Stafford, William Howard, -- Viscount, 1614-1680.
Colledge, Stephen, 1635?-1681.
Popish Plot, 1678.
Cite this Item
"Stafford's memoires, or, A brief and impartial account of the birth and quality, imprisonment, tryal, principles, declaration, comportment, devotion, last speech, and final end, of William, late lord viscount Stafford, beheaded upon Tower-hill on Wednesday the 29. of December 1681 hereunto is also annexed a short appendix concerning some passages in Stephen Colleges trial." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A34573.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.

Pages

PARAGRAPH II. Of Spiritual and Temporal Authority.

1. GEneral Councils (which are the Church of God, Representative) have no Commission from Christ to Frame New Matters of Faith, (these being sole Divine Revelations) but only toc explain and ascertain unto us, what antiently was, and is received and retained, as of Faith in the Church, upon ari∣sing Debates and Controversies about them. The Definitions of which, General Coun∣cils, in matters of Faith only, and proposed in such, oblige, under pain of Heresie, all the Faithful, to a Submission of Judgment. But,

2. It is no Article of Faith to believe, That General Councils cannot Err, ei¦ther in matters of Fact or Discipline, alterable by circumstances of time and place; or in matters of Speculation or Civil Policy, depending on meer humane Judgment, or Testimony. Neither of these being Divine Revelationsd deposited in the Ca∣tholick Church; in regard to which alone, she hath thee promised Assistance of the Holy Ghost. Hence it is deduced,

3. If a General Council (much less a Papal Consistory) should undertake to depose a King, and absolve his Subjects from their Allegiance; no Catholick, as Catholick, is bound to submit to such a Decree. Hence also it followeth:

Page 49

4. The Subjects of the King of England lawfully may, without the least breach of any Catholick Principle, Renounce, even upon Oath, the Teaching, Mantain∣ing, or Practising the Doctrine of deposing Kings Excommunicated for Heresie, by any Authority whatsoever, as Repugnant to the fundamental Laws of the Na∣tion, Injurious to Soveraign Power, Destructive to the Peace and Government; and by consequence, in His Majesties Subjects, Impious and Damnable. Yet not pro∣perly Heretical, taking the Word Heretical in that connatural, genuine sense, it is usually understood in the Catholik Church; on account of which, and other Expressions, (no wise appertaining to Loyalty,) it is, that Catholicks of tender Consciences refuse the Oath commonly call▪d the Oath of Allegience.

5. Catholicks believe, That the Bishop of Rome is the Successor of St Peter, d Vicar of Jesns Christ upon Earth, and Head of the whole Catholick Church; which Church is therefore sitly stiled Roman Catholick, being an universal Body e united under one visible Head. Nevertheless,

6. It is no matter of Faith to believe, That the Pope is in himself Infallible, se∣perate from a General Council, even in Expounding the Faith: By consequence Papal Definitions or Decrees, though ex Cathedra, as they term them, (taken exclusively from a General Council, or Ʋniversal Acceptance of the Church) oblige none under Pain of Heresie, to an interior Assent.

7. Nor do Catholicks as Catholicks believe, that the Pope hath any direct, or indirect Authority over the Temporal Power and Jurisdiction of Princes. Hence, if the Pope should pretend to Absolve or Dispence with His Maiesties Subjects from their Allegiance, upon account of Heresie or Schism, such Dispensation would be vain, and null; and all Cathelick Subjects (notwithstanding such Dispensation or Absolution) would be still bound in Conscience to defend their King and Coun∣trey, at the hazard of their Lives and Fortunes, even against the Pope himself, in case he should invade the Nation.

8. And as for Problematical Disputes, or Errors of particular Divines, in this, or any other matter whatsoever, the Catholick Church is no wise responsible for them: Nor, are Catholicks as Catholicks, justly punishable on their Account. But,

9. As for the King Killing Doctrine, or Murder of Princes, Excommunicated for Heresie; It is an Article of Faith in the Catholick Church, and expresly de∣clared in the General Council of Constance, That such Doctrine is Damnable and Heretical, being contrary to the known Laws of God, and Nature.

10. Personal Misdemeanors of what Nature soever, ought not to be Imputed to the Catholick Church, when not Justifyable 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the Tenents of her Faith and Do∣ctrine; For which Reason, though the Stories of the Paris Massacre; the Irish Cruelties; Or Powder-Plot, had been exactly true, (which yet for the most part are Notoriously mis-related) nevertheless Catholicks as Catholicks ought not to Suffer for such Offences, any more then the Eleven Apostles ought to have Suf∣fered for Judas's Treachery.

It is an Article of the Catholick Faith to believe, that no Power on Earth can License Men to Lye, to Forswear, and Perjure themselves, to Massacre their Neighbours, or destroy their Native Countrey, on pretence of promoting the Ca∣tholick Cause, or Religion; Furthermore, all Pardons and Dispensations granted, or pretended to be granted, in order to any such ends or Designs▪ have no other validity or Effect, then to add Sacriledge and Blasphemy to the above-mentioned Crimes.

12. The Doctrine of Equivocation or Mental Reservation, however wrong∣fully Imposed on the Catholick Religion, is notwithstanding, neither taught, nor approved by the Church, as any part of her Belief. On the contrary, Simplicity, and Godly Sincerity, are constantly recommended by her, as truly Christian Vertues, necessary to the Conservation of Justice, Truth, and Com∣mon Society.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.