The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister.

About this Item

Title
The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister.
Author
Cicero, Marcus Tullius.
Publication
London :: Printed for Abel Swalle ...,
1683.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Cite this Item
"The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33161.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 18, 2024.

Pages

SECT. VII. The Assertion oppos'd by an Argument from the Topick of Fortitude.

(g) EVERY Valiant man hath also Assurance, (since Confidence, by a vulgar mistake, is only restrain'd to a bad Sense, although derived from confiding, which is commendable.) Now he that hath Assurance, cannot be in Fear; for to have Assurance, and be in Fear, are implicatory. But he that is liable to Discontent, is also to Fear; for we Fear those things impending and approach∣ing,

Page 159

at whose presence we are Discontented. So it follows, that Fortitude and Discontent are in∣compatible. It is therefore likely, that he who is liable to Discontent, is also liable to Fear, to Faint∣heartedness, and dejection of Spirit; and he that is liable to these, is liable to be a Slave, to confess himself, at some time or other, worsted; and he that can admit of these, will admit of timorousness and Cowardise; but these things are not incident to a valiant man, therefore neither is Discontent. Now none is Wise, but he that is Valiant; there∣fore neither is Discontent incident to a wise man. Furthermore, he that is Valiant, must needs be brave Spirited; and he that is of a brave Spirit, invincible; and he that is invincible, must despise the World, and look upon it, as beneath him; but none can despise that, for which he can be Discontented. From whence necessarily follows, that a Valiant man is never Discontented; but all wise men are Valiant, therefore Discontent is not incident to a Wise man: And even as the Eye being out of order, is not duely dispos'd to the perfor∣mance of its Office; and the other parts, nay the whole Body, when it is out of order, cannot dis∣charge its Office and Duty; so the Mind being out of order, is not in fit case to discharge its Office. Now the Office of the Soul, is to use its Reason aright; and a Wise man's Soul is always so dispos'd, that he useth his Reason after a most right manner, there∣fore it is never disturb'd; but Discontent is a di∣sturbance of the Soul, therefore a Wise man will be always free from it.

(g) Every Valiant man.] Syllogistical Disputation was after the Stoical way, which begins here.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.