the Rainbow, for a sign that there never should have been
another Flood. So that if God had said to Noah, I do
assure thee there shall never be a second Deluge, and
for a sign of this, Behold I set the Sun in the Firmament:
This would have done as well, he says, as the Rainbow.
That is, in my judgment, it would have done nothing
at all, more than the bare promise. And if it had
done no more than the bare promise, it was superflu∣ous.
Therefore if the Rainbow was no more than
the Sun would have been, it was a superfluous sign.
They to whom these two signs are of equal signifi∣cancy
and effect, lye without the reach of all con∣viction,
and I am very willing to indulge them their
own opinions.
But he says, God sometimes has made things to be signs▪
that are common and usual. Thus the fruit of a Tree grow∣ing
in Paradise, was made a sign of man's Immortality. But
how does it appear that this was a common Tree: or
that it was given to Adam as a sign that he should be
Immortal? neither of these appear from Scripture.
Secondly, he says, Shooting with bow and arrows upon the
ground, was made a sign to Joash of his prevailing against
the Syrians. This was only a command to make war
against Syria, and a Prophecy of success; both de∣liver'd
in a Symbolical or Hieroglyphical way. The
command was signified by bidding the King shoot
an arrow, which was the sign of War. And the sign
of Victory or of divine assistance, was the Prophets
strengthening the King's hands to draw the Bow. This
is nothing as to a sign given in Nature, or from the
Natural World, in confirmation of a Divine Promise:
which is the thing we are only to consider.
All the rest of this Chapter is lax discourse without
proof. And as to the significancy of the Rainbow,
upon supposition that it was a New Appearance: And
its insignificancy upon supposition that it was an Old
Appearance, we have spoken so fully in the Theory it
self, that it would be needless here to make any lon∣ger
stay upon this argument.