[That Supreme Magistrates are inferiour to the whole,
though about every individual,] it evidently appears, in
that it plainly signifies little lesse than a contradiction:
For, what is it but every individual in any number what∣soever,
that makes up the whole? Or if it be meant not
of every, but of any one, severally taken, it signifies no∣thing;
unlesse it be, That the Supreme Magistrate is su∣periour
only to Thomas, and William, and James and John,
to wit, severally, but not joyntly: And, if this were true,
it would indeed be a brave encouragement to any power∣ful
party that should oppose the Publick Weale, and seek
the subversion of the Fundamental Laws, Customes, and
Constitution of the whole Civil Body of the Kingdome.
And how soon such a Party, well armed, will call them∣selves
the Whole, experience enough hath taught all men
to know: And then all the rest of the whole Nation is at
their mercy, and that without remedy: For the Supreme
Magistrate hath no authority over them as they are a
combined pack of Rebels conjoyned in a close conspiracy,
whatsoever authority He may have over every individual,
in severalty from the rest, now call'd the whole. Who sees
not that this Doctrine is meerly Anabaptistical, striking
at the root of all Magistracy properly so called? For what∣soever
power can be pretended or imagined to be in the
whole people, (which is indeed the whole,) it is no such
thing as Magistracy. And if there be any such power that
can justly nullifie or check all Magistracie, the most rigid
Anabaptists will require no more, to warrant any enter∣prize
for the utter subversion of it. But, that there should
indeed be any power in a Nation, (beside the natural vi∣gour
that is in them,) but only the Civil power of Magi∣stracy,
is a meer Chimaera. All the individuals, and every
one put together (the Magistrate excepted) are but pri∣vate
persons, endur'd with no more civil authority than any