spoken of, not onely in respect that Historians cannot affirm those lewd actions for truths, which in point of lust are done in the dark, when doors are shut; but for that such things (though truths) ought not to be touched upon, which for the great scandal which they occasion, ought rather to beburied in oblivion, then divulged; it being the end of all Historians to insert vertue into mens minds, not to instruct vice. Tis said indeed, That Dion was told in milder terms, that History, which ought to be wholly real truths, the very pitch of politick instructions, needed not to be filled with the so often reiteration of those prodigies, with which he had so heaped up his writings, as they did even choak those that read them. And which was the more tedious, for that they had exceeded the bounds of discretion, both in their numbers and qualities: For Apollo his self smiled to see him write of so many showers of blood and stones; he not remembring that he had ever exhaled such Meteors, which were afterwards congealed into blood, or turned into stones. It is said, That Titus Livius, the father of the Roman Histories, blushed not a little at this reprehension which was given to Dion; perhaps, because he found himself guilty of the like errors: But it is certainly affirmed by all, that Lampridius was severely proceeded against; for by order of the whole congregation, his Histories were turned back upon his hands, and he was freely told, That he should go and teach those execrable lusts in the publike Classis, wherewith he had so delighted himself to fill his shameful papers, wherein he had written the lives of Heliogabalus, Cara∣calla, and other lascivious monsters of nature: It is also noised that Ma∣chiavel was reproved for his mad and desperate policy, with which he had so freely filled his Histories, and other writings, as he openly mani∣fested his desire was to draw his Readers into the same ditch of Impiety whereinto himself was shamefully fallen. Tis said, that in the next place the Congregation found fault with Guicchardin, for his having spoken amiss of the Venetian Commonwealth, the which was called by the whole Assembly, the Sanctuary of the Vertuosi, the true seat of perfect liberty, the Bulwark against Barbarians, the Mint of Libraries, the salt of humane wisdom, glory of the Italian Nation; and many do be∣lieve, that Guicchardin in the face of the whole Congregation, did not onely acknowledge, but bewail his error, alledging for his excuse, that meer envy to see the State of Venice grow daily more glorious in her eternal liberties, whilst the Florentines, by their domestick factions, lost their freedom, had made him so foully prevaricate; but that the Fame of Venice, the glory of that excellent councel, whereby she did (as a rare and onely example) daily increase both in State and reputation, was arrived at that height of splendor, as was not to be obscured by the pen of whatsoever passionate writer. It is also said, That Ialiano Goselini. Secretary to the Senat of Millan was sent for by the Censors; who told him, that certainly he thought he spoke to drunken men, when in the life wihich he writ of Don Ferrante Gonsaga, where he makes mention of the Apostolick sea, he did not stick to say, That her greatness was Cae∣sars particular care; and whilst Goseleni was about to defend what he had said, he was bid to go make Ballads, invented for flattery, it be∣ing the business of History to write real truths. And because Girola•…•…o Conestaggio, Conestaggio, Gentleman of Genua, had taken his History of Portugal out of the Delfick Library, which had been there many years before,