Religio laici written in a letter to John Dryden, Esq.
About this Item
Title
Religio laici written in a letter to John Dryden, Esq.
Author
Blount, Charles, 1654-1693.
Publication
London :: Printed for R. Bentley and S. Magnes ...,
1683.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Cite this Item
"Religio laici written in a letter to John Dryden, Esq." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A28445.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 3, 2024.
Pages
descriptionPage 18
A Dialogue concerning Revela∣tions.
Therefore in the first place, I
should demand in a Rational and
Judicial way, how I could be as∣sured,
that the Priests had re∣ceived
a Revelation, and what
was the time, place, and man∣ner
thereof? In Answer to which,
I conceive the Priests would tell
me; That Laicks ought not fur∣ther
to enquire into such Myste∣ries
than becomes them; that if
this their Revelation were not
accepted as an unquestionable and
necessary Truth, there could be no
cause thereof, but an obdurate
heart, and want of Divine Grace
in me; that if the Sacerdotal
word might not be taken concern∣ing
the Truth of the said Reve∣lation,
descriptionPage 19
there was no other way to
inform me thereof: It being Gods
manner to speak to his beloved
Servants, and not to such gross
Sinners as I was; and to be
brief, that if I did not give en∣tire
credit to this Revelation of
theirs, it was for want of Faith:
And therefore, that no better
counsel could be given me, than
to pray that all obstructions
might be taken away, and in∣stead
of my heart of stone, that
I might receive an heart of flesh,
such as may be capable of this
heavenly Illumination. Final∣ly,
They would reply nothing con∣cerning
the time or manner of
their Revelation, but only in ge∣neral
say, that the Place was
God's holy Temple, where none
could be partakers of the Word
of God, but such only as were
descriptionPage 20
his near Servants, and did or∣dinarily
take their rest and sleep
therein.
Now to this I should Answer,
That if I might not know the
time and manner, when and how
this their Revelation was made,
I would yet gladly be informed,
what Language was used betwixt
them, and whether the words
were of God's immediate inven∣tion,
or that there were only cer∣tain
Notes and Characters in
use betwixt them, whereby they
understood one another? Or o∣therwise,
if they had not a par∣ticular
Language betwixt them,
which was intelligible; whether
God spake the ordinary Lan∣guage
of that Country, and in
what Tone; whether the same
were lowder than Thunder, or
only the ordinary heighth, or
descriptionPage 21
whether lower yet, by some close
or secret expression, somewhat
less than a whisper? To which
I believe the Priests would Re∣ply,
That if a King or Princi∣pal
Magistrate did send me a
Message or Command by some
one of his known Officers, I
would not then presume to make
all these Questions, they being
not only uncivil, but also imper∣tinent
and derogatory to the Su∣preme
Authority, and there∣fore
that they who were known
Ministers of God, did, without gi∣ving
further account, require Obe∣ence
from me in his Name. But
notwithstanding all this, I should
again take the boldness to ask
them, (supposing they heard such
words) how yet they could know
that God spake them, and whe∣ther
they were so familiar with
descriptionPage 22
the person of that God, as to
know him by his Voice, and di∣stinguish
him from all others?
How they could assure themselves
firmly, that it was no inferiour
Spirit that gave them this Reve∣lation,
there being Spirits of both
sorts, both good and bad, which
use to deliver Oracles and Reve∣lations,
according to the Doctrine
of the Manichees, who founded
their Opinions upon that sentence,
viz. that the Devil is the God of
this world. But again, suppo∣sing
it was a good Spirit that
spoke, whether Camillus, or his
Boy who waited on him in the
Temple, did hear or understand
the Voice as well as himself?
Here I know the Priests Answer
would be, That neither himself,
nor any else could come to the
knowledge of God's Will, but
descriptionPage 23
by their means and conveyance:
And for the rest would again re∣quire
my Obedience, on peril of
my being condemn'd as an Infidel;
thinking by these words at least
to overawe me.
But this would be so far from
terrifying me, that it would but
put into my head more Scruples,
concerning the Truth of their
Revelation? when pursuing my
way, I should gladly demand of
him, how yet I could be assured,
that in the repeating of this their
Oracle or Revelation, they had
omitted no part thereof through
forgetfulness; or added any thing
to it by a Paraphrase, or Ex∣plication;
And briefly, whether
nothing were interweaved or
changed therein?
The Priests would here assu∣redly
reply, That it was but a
descriptionPage 24
prophane part in me to doubt any
thing were either added to, or ta∣ken
from the Divine Revelation,
much less any thing mixed or in∣terwoven
with it: and that the
same God, who gave them this
Revelation, did and would pre∣serve
it entire in their memory;
for further proof whereof, they
were ready to set it down, and
sign it under their Hands and
Seals, that so it might be trans∣mitted
to Posterity, as an Au∣thentick
Record: To which also,
the Amanuenses or Coppiers of
it might repair to correct all
that should be depraved, either
by their carelesness, or wilful
perversion of the Sense thereof,
that so their Errors might af∣terwards
be rectified, attested and
subscribed by sufficient Witnes∣ses,
as agreeing with the Origi∣nal;
descriptionPage 25
there being no other Means
so good to ascertain us Laicks,
that nothing therein was counter∣feit,
&c. Which Method (I con∣fess)
if it had been used in all
Ages and Countries where Re¦velations
are said to have been
made in private to Priests, would
have been much approved; since
Copies of Copies, through many
Descents, may be subject to many
Corruptions, especially among
those who would draw all things
to their own Interest; which
might as well have become these
latter Times, as the former; since
our Modern Priests (for the most
part) turn Religion into Faction,
striving to render all others of
different Perswasions (though in
the least matters) odious. Which
Bitterness of Spirit we find not
evidently remarked among the
descriptionPage 26
Heathen Priests; so that how
Ignorant and False soever they
were, yet are they not recorded
to have been Incendiaries, and
Persecutors of one another even
unto Death, for Religion and
Conscience sake: No, they had
no such hellish Contrivances as
the Parisian and Hibernian Mas∣sacres;
no such Instruments of the
Devil, as Ravilliac, Clement, and
the Priest that poyson'd our Eng∣lish
Monarch in the Eucharist;
no such Traiterous Conspiracies
as the Powder-plot: Nor did
they use to convert one another
to their Opinions by Fire and Fa∣got,
and Rosting Kings alive,
as the Spaniards did in the In∣dies.
He that compares but the
Behaviour of those of the Religi∣ous
among the Heathens, with the
Carriage of our Popish Bishops
descriptionPage 27
here in England before the Refor∣mation,
as related by our own
Christian Writers, would take the
Heathen Priests for much the
better Christians of the two.
So that, notwithstanding all
this, I should not give the Priests
over so, but at least tell them, I
could have wished they had pro∣ceeded
more clearly with me; since
the more they debased my Vnder∣standing
in Divine Mysteries,
the more was I obliged to stand to
my Common Reason, until they
had made all things manifest or
intelligible to me, without going
about to convince me of Infideli∣ty,
because I believed not more
than I understood: or when a
further Belief were required, I
hoped they would not charge me to
believe it any otherwise than as a
thing possible, or at most but like∣ly,
descriptionPage 28
since this was all I could do,
when God had given me no suffi∣cient
Revelation for the confirm∣ing
of theirs. And to affirm it a
good Plea in the Court of Hea∣ven,
to say, That a Man began at
the Faith that was taught in his
Native Country; Who might not
then excuse himself for adhering
to the grossest Superstition that
can be imagined in any Age or
Country whatever, where no less
Esteem and Veneration was given
publickly to their Sacerdotal Col∣lege,
than is now paid to the pre∣sent
Church of Rome in Italy
and Spain. Finally, therefore, I
should ask them, How any Priest
could assure and satisfie my Con∣science,
that the Revelation made
to him did so concern me, that I
must embrace it as an undoubted
Axiom, or Truth? To which (I
descriptionPage 29
am confident) they would answer,
as formerly, That they had dis∣charged
their Duty in delivering
Gods Word, and that I ought to
take heed lest I be severely pu∣nished
for want of Faith, and so
leave me, after having with much
gravity expressed their sorrow
for my incorrigible stubborn
Heart, &c.
But, notwithstanding all this,
I do not yet deny, but that Re∣velations
may be made to Men
either sleeping or waking; but
where, I suppose, (as we find in
Holy Writ) earnest Prayers have
been made before-hand, and
some publick and miraculous Con∣firmation
of the thing revealed
hath followed. However, un∣less
the thing in it self be right
good and honest, I should not con∣ceive
it was God that spake, but
descriptionPage 30
some Evil Spirit that would de∣ceive
me; it having pleased
God so to implant the Love of
Goodness and Truth in the Soul,
that he hath made them a part
of Common Reason, and conspi∣cuous
by their own Light; from
which therefore if we recede,
we shall find our selves cast not
onely into much Errour and
Darkness, but even in the Court
of our own Consciences criminal
and condemned: For which
Cause also I believe God is so
sparing in making publick Re∣lations,
because if Men did
wholly trust to them, it might
be a means of making them
neglect their proper Duties. It
would be (as the Learned Grego∣ry
in his Posthuma observes) a
Stumbling-block to the Gentiles,
when they found it read in Osea,
descriptionPage 31
that God commanded a Prophet
to commit Adultery: and in Exo∣dus,
that he taught his own Peo∣ple
how to cozen the Egyptians:
How could they believe (saith he)
that there was no God like the
God of the Hebrews, when they
should find in the Scriptures,
that even this God had also a
Right-hand and a Son? Or that
if he had been so much better
than those of the Heathen, was
it likely that Aaron his own High
Priest, would have preferred their
Apis or Egyptian Calf before
him? But the Reason of all this
is, because to unenlightned Na∣ture
these Passages might seem
inconsistent with the Attributes
of the Deus Optimus Maximus;
and for that (as our aforesaid
Learned Author well notes)
all ways of Religion would seem
descriptionPage 32
strange, but that we are taught
betimes to fear: and till we re∣ceive
a Spirit of Judgment to
discern the Right way, every Way
is thought to be Wrong, but that
which we are brought up in. And
thus much for Publick Revelati∣ons.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.