Guises kept her in Captivity, requiring him to take up Arms, under the specious pretence of delivering the King and Queen. But that Princess afterwards falling into the power of the Confederates, and being constrain'd to disown the Commission she had given the Prince to take Arms, he sent her Original Letters to those German Princes to whom he had a mind to justifie his Conduct, which she took for so heinous an Affront, that she would never pardon it to him However, to hinder the people from joyning with the Prince, another Edict was publisht in the King's Name, to confirm the Edict of January, which granted an Indemnity for all that was past, and permission for the free publick Exercise of the Reformed Religi∣on every where, but in the City and Suburbs of Paris. But the Prince baf∣fled that Stratagem, by publishing the Copy of a Treaty of Confe∣deracy concluded between the Pope, the King of Spain, and the Gui¦ses, against the Protestants, which he had newly intercepted. Not but that on that, and all other like occasions, there was always a consider∣able number of Protestants that suffer'd themselves to be deceived by those Illusory Edicts; Nay, and that there always was some of them that have been wheedled in to bear Arms too against their Brethren, for the Court-Interest. But yet still the Division was not so great as very much to weaken the Princes Party; who, sometime after the Queen had disowned them, having called a Council of Conscience of six∣ty Ministers, to consult whether it were lawful after that, to continue the War; they came to this Resolution, That since those Arms were at first taken up by Order of that Princess, whilst free, against the E∣nemies of the King, and the State, and the Violaters of Edicts, they were lawfully taken up, and ought not to be laid down (by any Counter-Order proceeding from her) whilst under the force of hers, and their common Enemies.
This War was very cruel in many places, because there were some Commanders on each side, that prosecuted it without any Mercy. For Des Adrets, on the Protestant side, was noted for his Cruelties, and Mon∣luc, on the other, would spare no body; Nay, and Mompensier too, signalised himself not a little by his Inhumanities. However, this difference there was between the Cruelties of the Two Parties, That those of the Catholicks were a continuation of what they had exerci∣sed for near 40 years past, by so many Butcherly Executions; and those of the Protestants were but actions of men made desperate by so long and barbarous a persecution. Which, by the way, deserves to be remarked against the Roman Catholick Historians, who always ex∣cuse, as much as they can, the Excesses of their own people, though never so villainous, but represent the Violences of the Princes Forces much horrider than they were. And indeed the Protestants found no mercy at all; No Faith of Treaties was ever kept with them, and not being content to destroy them by Fights and Massacres, The Catholicks wherever they had power, further employed against them he forms of Justice. But nothing more furiously incensed the Peo∣ple