Chap. 17.
Inference 5. That it is not the dishonour, but the Praise of Christ, his Apostles and the Gospel, that they speak in a plain manner of the Certain, Necessary things, without the Vonity of School-uncertainties, and feigned unprofitable nations.
I Have been my self oft Scandalized at the Fa∣thers of the 4th Carthage Council, who for∣bad Bishops the reading of the Heathens Books; and at some good old unlearned Christian Bishops who spake to the same purpose, and oft reproach Apollinaris, Aetius and other Hereticks for their Secular or gentile Learning, Logick, &c. And I wondered that Julian and they should prohibit the same thing. But one that is so far distant from the action, is not a competent Judge of the reasons of it. Perhaps there were some Christian Authors then, who were sufficient for such literature as was best for the Church: Perhaps they saw that the danger of reading the Heathens Philosophy was like to be greater than the benefit: Both because it was them that they lived among, and were to gather the Churches out of, and if they put an honour upon Logick and Philoso∣phy, they might find it more difficult to draw men from that party which excelled in it, to the belief of the Scriptures which seemed to have so little of it: And they had seen also how a mixture of Platonick notions with Christia∣nity, had not only been the Original of many heresies, but had sadly blemished many great Doctors of the Churches.
Whatever the cause was, it appeareth that in those days it was the deepest insight into the Sacred Scriptures which was reckoned for the most solid Learning; Philosophy was so confounded by Differences, Sects, Uncertainties, and Falshoods, that made it the more despicable, by how much