thereunto, unless it be done also in a New Testament Spirit.
Truely, Sir, what you say is very right, That a New Testament Spirit, i. e. Charity is a necessary qualification to denominate any action to be truly good. For, Though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and have not Charity, saith St. Paul, it pro∣fiteth me nothing. But this comes not home at all to the case. For the Question between us is not, Whether any action can be good now without Cha∣rity? But, Whether Charity, or a good end, can make any action (how foul and lawless soever) to be good? Bonum, say the Schoolmen, fit ex Inte∣gris; Malum è quolibet defectu. To make a thing evil, it is sufficient that it fail in any one cir∣cumstance; but it must be perfect, and complete throughout to make it good. And therefore, though to be done without Charity, or a New Testament Spirit, be enough indeed to make any action evil: it will by no means follow from hence, That whereever Charity is, the action must streight be good, supposing it to fail yet in some other parti∣cular. For then all actions will be alike. Treason, Perjury, Lying, and the rest, in an equal degree of vertue, and capacity to good, as Alms, and Prayers, and Martyrdom. As neither of them good, if not done in Charity: So by that they may all be sub∣lim'd into necessary acts of Piety, and Religion. Whereas these things are so intrinsecally evil, and ex natura Rei, that they can never be otherwise. Lying (for example) being so contrary to the na∣ture, and essence of God, who is Truth it self, that He can no more lye, than not be God. God cannot lye. And what He cannot doe himself, no Spirit