An answer to the reasons for continuing the Palace-Court

About this Item

Title
An answer to the reasons for continuing the Palace-Court
Publication
[London :: s.n.,
1700]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Courts -- England -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"An answer to the reasons for continuing the Palace-Court." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A25617.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 16, 2024.

Pages

Page [unnumbered]

An Answer to the REASONS for con∣tinuing the Palace-Court.

IT's pretended, That the Palace-Court was erected Seventy Years since, which is notoriously false, it being Erected by Letters-Pattents from King Charles II. under the Great Seal, October the 4th. Anno Regni sui 16. And tho' it was of that Antiquity, yet if it be now found to be a Grievance, that can be no reason for its continuance.

The Retale Trade being chiefly used among the meaner fort of People, and Trade being uncapable of being carried on without some Credit, if there were not sufficient means pro∣vided, at small Charges, and in a little time, to enforce Payment, the Retale Trade would sink, and the meaner sort of People would perish for want of Credit. It cannot be deny'd, but that the Erecting a Court of Law (to try small Causes by Juries, for the ease of the Sub∣ject) is extreamly useful, in case there had been a defect of Justice for want of such Courts, but in Westminster, White-Chapel, Stepney, St. Katharines, Clinke, Southwark, and almost in all places within the limits of the Palace-Court, there are such Courts of Record; so that unless it be for the lucre and benefit of the Steward-Council, and Attornies of the Palace-Court, there is no ne∣cessity or reason for that Court to interfere with the other Courts, and encroach upon the Limits and Jurisdictions of the several Lords of them. And it's to be noted, That Marshal-Court Bayliffs enter all private Liberties to make their Arrests, which the Sheriffs Officers don't do, tho' to execute the Process of a superiour Court, unless they will subject themselves to the Action of the Bayliff of the private Liberty.

Besides the several Courts above-mention'd, within their Limits and Jurisdictions have (by prescription time out of mind) try'd Causes of three or four Pound Value, as well as the Palace-Court, therefore no need for that Court.

It is for the ease of the Subject to have Justice administer'd near their own Habitations, but the Palace-Court compels Persons out of Middlesex, Essex, Surry, and Kent, within twelve Miles, to be try'd at that Court held in Southwark, which, without doubt, is a great Violence and Oppression to the Subject, to be forc'd from one County to another to receive Justice by Process of any inferiour Court.

'Tis suggested, That if the Palace-Court be suppress'd, that another of the same Nature must be erected, which is meerly begging the Question; for there is no need of that, or any other such like Court, the defect being supply'd by the aforesaid Inferiour Courts and Juris∣dictions.

'Tis said, That the Mayor's and Sheriff's Courts in London are Inferiour Courts, and have been found useful; but if those Courts had Jurisdiction twelve Miles round Guild-Hall, they would no doubt, instead of being useful (as now they must be confess'd to be) be a great Grievance and Oppression to the People.

The Palace-Court pretends to discharge all Prisoners where the Debt and Damages are under Forty Shillings: This course has been in use, it may be a little before the sitting of this Par∣liament, as if they foresaw, that their oppressive Court should receive its downfal from the Wisdom and Justice of this Parliament.

It is pretended, That the Council and Attornies of that Court have bought their Places for Life, and consequently have a Freehold in them; and therefore it would be an unjust thing to take away any Man's Freehold. If this should be allow'd as a sufficient Objection, then no Act of Parliament could ever be made; for no Act that ever was made, or ever will be made, but must be to the prejudice and disadvantage of a few private Persons; so that this can be no reason to continue the Palace-Court.

It seems they are willing to submit to a regulation, knowing that nothing but a total sub∣version of this new erected Palace-Court can in the least affect them; for a regulation of their Proceedings will be little or no ease to the Subject, their vast Jurisdiction extending twelve Miles round the Palace, making a Circle above seventy Miles in compass, being the Grievance complain'd of, which all the Towns and Villages about London can testifie; and by the reason that they obtain'd the Letters-Pattents, for the encrease of their Jurisdiction, as to the Persons, so they may obtain Letters-Pattents to enlarge their Jurisdiction as to place; and consequently gain Power to Arrest seventy Miles round the Palace, and then there would be little left for either inferiour or superiour Court to do.

It cannot be deny'd, but that the Court of Marshalsea is a very ancient Court, and very useful for trying all Causes arising between any of the King's-Houshold; but it is plain, that that Court was very early for enlarging its Jurisdiction, and did direct Process against all Persons within the Verge, whether of the Houshold of the King or not; to obviate which encroachment, it was Enacted by the Parliament, that the Parties Arrested should have li∣berty to averr, that they were not of the Houshold at the time of the Suit commenc'd; by which Act their Invention to encrease their Jurisdiction was subverted; and it is to be observ'd, that every Act made concerning the Marshalsea either restrains or explains their Jurisdiction, but no Act enlarges it. And since it was thought so necessary formerly to keep that Court within its due Limits and Jurisdiction, why it should be thought convenient at present, that this new erected Palace-Court should be favour'd with such ample Authority, is a thing very difficult to imagine.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.